Volume 3, Issue 1 (3-2018)                   IJREE 2018, 3(1): 11-18 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


English Language Department, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Sciences, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Abstract:   (573 Views)
Given the burgeoning interest in the use of technology and electronic tools for educational purposes among students, this study set out with the purpose of investigating medical students’ perception of using e-learning tools and applications in an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) program at an Iranian medical university. The study also aimed to discover the extent to which the students prefer to use paper dictionaries, offline mobile dictionaries, computer-based dictionaries, and Internet-based dictionaries. To do so, an electronically-mediated course plan was designed and implemented for eight weeks. The course plan required the students to use different types of resources, including electronic learning tools. Then, a questionnaire eliciting the students’ perception of the significance of using electronic learning tools in the program and asking the students the extent to which they used different resources (paper dictionaries, offline mobile dictionaries, computer-based dictionaries and software and Internet-based applications and tools) was developed and used. The results showed that the majority of the students perceived that employing electronic tools and applications for educational purposes in the program was highly significant. It was also discovered that the students gave a high priority to offline mobile dictionaries; Internet-based applications, paper dictionaries, and computer-based dictionaries were other resources they used in the program in order of priority. The study carries practical implications for teachers and educational policymakers, especially in the developing countries where problems with the Internet linger on.
 
 
Full-Text [PDF 314 kb]   (111 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Amiri, M. (2000). A study on the English language programs at B.A. level at Tehran universities. Master's thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
2. Atai, M. R., & Mohamadzadeh, A. (2007). A needs analysis of graduate ESAP students of Humanities: A triangulated perspective. Proceeding of the sixth international AELFE conference; Teaching and Learning ESP; Learning the boundaries. IFCAL, LISBOA.
3. Bastos, H. P. P., & Machado, G. P. F. (2016). Dictionaries on Smartphones: Learners' assessment of features and potential of dictionary apps as pedagogical tools. In Rocha Á., Correia A., Adeli H., Reis L., Mendonça Teixeira M.(eds), New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 445). Springer, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-31307-8_15]
4. Bataineh, A. M. (2014). The effect of electronic dictionaries and hypermedia annotations on English major students' reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(4), 102-115. doi:10.5296/ijl.v6i4.6025 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i4.6025 [DOI:10.5296/ijl.v6i4.6025]
5. Beatty, B., & Ulasewicz, C. (2006). Faculty perspectives on moving from blackboard to the module learning management system. Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 50(4), 36-45.
6. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons. [DOI:10.1002/9781119239086]
7. Collins, J. B. (2016). Changes in electronic dictionary usage patterns in the age of free online dictionaries: Implications for vocabulary acquisition. APU Journal of Language Research, 1, 36-49.
8. Dashtestani, R. (2013). EFL teachers' and students' perspectives on the use of electronic dictionaries for learning English. CALL-EJ, 14(2), 51-65.
9. Esfandiari, R. (2015). An investigation into ESP needs of Iranian students of law. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 7(3), 29-59.
10. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315]
11. Green, H., & Hannon, C. (2007). Their space: Education for a digital generation. London: Demos.
12. Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ, 322(7277), 40-44. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.322.7277.40] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Eslami, Z. R (2010). Teachers' voice vs. students' voice: A needs analysis approach to English for academic purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 3-11. [DOI:10.5539/elt.v3n1p3]
14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p3 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v3n1p3]
15. Hamdi, C. (2015). The effects of electronic dictionary use on reading comprehension and vocabulary retention of EFL learners. Paper presented at Bejaia University International Conference (BUIC2015), Constantine University, Algeria.
16. Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
17. Kennedy, G., Krause, K. L., Gray, K., Judd, T., Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2006). Questioning the net generation: A collaborative project in Australian higher education. In L. Markauskaite P. Goodyear & P. Reimann (Eds.), Who's learning? Whose technology? Proceedings ascilite. Sydney, 413-417.
18. Khanjani, A. (2005). A needs analysis of the ESAP programs for science students of Guilan University. Unpublished master's thesis. Kharazmi University, Tehran.
19. Khoramshahi, E. (2015). A needs analysis study on the curriculum of simultaneous interpretation major in applied-scientific comprehensive university (MA Thesis). Islamic Azad University, Saveh-Science and Research Branch. Saveh, Iran.
20. Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives–the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Etr & D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6]
21. Kobayashi, C. (2007). Comparing electronic and printed dictionaries: Their effects on lexical processing strategy use, word retention, and reading comprehension. In K. Bradford-Watts (Ed.), JALT 2006 conference proceedings (pp. 657-671). Tokyo: JALT.
22. Koyama, T., & Takeuchi, O. (2007). Does look-up frequency help reading comprehension of EFL learners? Two empirical studies of electronic dictionaries. CALICO Journal, 25(1), 110-125.
23. Lahti, M., Hätönen, H., Välimäki, M. (2014). Impact of eLearning on nurses' and student nurses' knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of nursing studies, 51(1), 136-49. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.017] [PMID]
24. Loucky, J. P. (2005). Combining the benefits of electronic and online dictionaries with CALL websites to produce effective and enjoyable vocabulary and language learning lessons. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 389-416. [DOI:10.1080/09588220500442764]
25. Mahmodi, M. (2017). The analysis of the factors affecting the acceptance of E-learning in higher education. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci, 8(1), 1-9. doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.11158. [DOI:10.5812/ijvlms.11158]
26. Malekan, F., & Hajimohammadi, R. (2017). The relationship between Iranian ESP learners' translation ability and resilience in reading comprehension. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 5(2), 47-52. [DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.47]
27. Omidinia, S., Masrom, M., & Selamat, H. (2011). Review of e-learning and ICT infrastructure in developing countries (Case study of Iran). American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 120-125. [DOI:10.3844/ajebasp.2011.120.125]
28. Osaki, S., Ochiai, N., Iso, T., & Aizawa, K. (2003). Electronic dictionary vs. printed dictionary: Accessing the appropriate meaning, reading comprehension, and retention. Paper presented at 3rd ASIALEX conference, Tokyo, Japan.
29. Nesi, H. (1998). Dictionaries on computer: How different markets have created different products. Paper presented at the Symposium on Language Learning and Computers held at Chemnitz University of Technology in February 1998.
30. Paechter, M., & Maire, M. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292-297. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004]
31. Power, T. (2014). Educational technology topic guide. HEART: Health and education advice and resource team. London: The Health & Education Advice & Resource Team (HEART).
32. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6, [DOI:10.1108/10748120110424816]
33. Raab, R. T., Ellis, W. W., & Abdon, B. R. (2002). Multispectral partnerships in e-learning: a potential force for improved human capital development in the Asia Pacific. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3), 217-229.
34. Salaway, G., Caruso, J. B., & Nelson, M. R. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Center for Applied Research. [PMID]
35. Sarsa, J., & Escudero, T. (2016). A roadmap to cope with common problems in E-Learning research designs. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 14(5), 336-349.
36. Shahini, G. H. (1988). A needs assessment for EFL courses at Shiraz University (M.A. thesis). Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
37. Shahini, G. M., & Riazi, A. M. (2001). A needs assessment for English language courses at Shiraz University. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 147-155.
38. Squire, K., & Dikkers, S. (2012). Amplifications of learning: Use of mobile media devices among youth. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18(4), 445-464. [DOI:10.1177/1354856511429646]
39. The International Telecommunication :union:. (2015). ICT facts & figures: the world in 2015. International Telecommunication :union:: Geneva.
40. Trifonova, A., & Ronchetti, M. (2003). Where is mobile learning going? In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2003--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1794-1801). Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
41. Wende, M. C. (2003). Globalisation and access to higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(2), 193-206. [DOI:10.1177/1028315303007002006]
42. Yaghoubi, J., Mohammadi, M. I., Iravani, H., Attaran, M., & Gheidi, A. (2008). Virtual students' perceptions of e-learning in Iran. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology–TOJET, 7(3), 89-95.