Volume 4, Issue 1 (3-2019)                   IJREE 2019, 4(1): 69-79 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

School of Arts and Humanities, Ibn Tofail University, Kénitra, Morocco
Abstract:   (447 Views)
Digital technology has recently become a ubiquitous feature of the modern era posing problems to higher education institutions. Digitization of the academic life has brought forth the claims that there is an evident disparity between the digital naturals and digital immigrants and that the myth of the former is “undemystifiable”. The claim that the new digitized generation has its own distinguished learning preferences, skills of learning and beliefs about how learning in such an era should make higher education authorities revisit their curricula and “reshuffle the academic cards” so that the digital immigrants could catch up with the fast-running pace of the digitized train and provide the digital natives with what they need for a successful academic life. The overall aim of the present work therefore is to investigate the extent to which the so-called digital natives really have control of the use of educational technology either as part of their self-directed learning practices or as part of a formal tertiary level teaching, the type of technologies they prefer to use, whether they possess the required digital skills that are important for their future careers, and how vital the digital skills are in boosting their employability. In line with the major findings of the present study, it could be concluded that the media change under the created discourse of “moral panic” has unveiled the singularity of this generation and has forced academic authorities to reconsider learning, teaching as well as both skills and employability of a such a generation for the betterment of a healthy academic higher education system. 
Full-Text [PDF 495 kb]   (94 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |

1. Ajhoun, R., & Daoudi, N. (2018). Morocco. In A. S. Weber & S. Hamlaoui (Eds.), E-learning in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region (263-283). Cham: Springer.
2. Alam, F. (2014). Using technology tools to innovate assessment, reporting, and teaching practices in engineering education. Hershey, PA: Engineering Science Reference. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-4666-5011-4]
3. Athreya, B. H., & Mouza, C. (2016). Thinking skills for the digital generation: The development of thinking and learning in the age of information. Basingstoke, England: Springer.
4. Bennett, S. J., Maton, K. A., & Kervin, L. K. (2008). The digital natives debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793
5. Black, K. (2001). Business statistics: Contemporary decision making. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
6. Blink, R. J. (2015). Leading learning for digital natives: Combining data and technology in the classroom. London, England: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315754710]
7. Commission Spéciale Éducation Formation. (1999). Charte Nationale d'Éducation et de Formation. Royaume du Maroc. http://www.uh2c.ac.ma/uh2c/loi/charte_fr.pdf
8. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2010). Ubiquitous learning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
9. Glenn S. L. (2013). Digital participatory culture and German language pedagogy. In J. L. Plews and B. Schmenk (Eds.), Traditions and transitions: curricula for German studies (265-314). Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
10. Keengwe, J., & Byamukama, R. (2018). Handbook of research on promoting higher-order skills and global competencies in life and work. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
11. Khosrow-Pour, M. (2002). Issues and trends of information technology management in contemporary organizations: 2002 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, Seattle, Washington, USA, May 19-22, 2002. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Pub.
12. Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., & Roy, L. (2018). Information literacy in the workplace: 5th European Conference, ECIL 2017, Saint Malo, France, September 18-21, 2017, Revised Selected Papers. Basingstoke, England: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9]
13. Livingstone, S. M., Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children. Bristol, England: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgvds.24 [DOI:10.2307/j.ctt9qgvds.6]
14. McNaughton, A. K. (2007). Instructional management profiles: The relationship between teaching styles, grade level preferences, and related factors. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3348979).
15. Munro, B. H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
16. Pinheiro, M. (2016). Handbook of research on engaging digital natives in higher education settings. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-0039-1]
17. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. [DOI:10.1108/10748120110424816]
18. Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6. [DOI:10.1108/10748120110424843]
19. Rutherford, S. M., & Standley, H. J. (2016). Social space or pedagogical powerhouse: Do digital natives appreciate the potential of web 2.0 technologies for learning. In M. Pinheiro & D. Simoes. (Eds.), Handbook of research on engaging digital natives in higher education settings (72-97). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
20. Smith, J. A. (2008). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage.
21. Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D. G., & Isaias, P. (2016). Competencies in teaching, learning and educational leadership in the digital age: Papers from CELDA 2014. Basingstoke, England: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-30295-9]
22. Stommel, M., & Willis, C. (2004). Clinical research: Concepts and principles for advanced practice nurses. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [PMCID]
23. Thomas, M. (2011). Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology, and the new literacies. New York, NY: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203818848]
24. Thomas, M. (2012). Design, implementation, and evaluation of virtual learning environments. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-4666-1770-4]
25. Treat, T. (2011). Technology management: New directions for community colleges, Number 154. John Wiley and Sons.
26. Walker, J. T. (1999). Statistics in criminal justice: Analysis and interpretation. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
27. Westera, W. (2013). The digital turn: How the internet transforms our existence. Bloomongton, IN, USA: AuthorHouse. [PMCID]
28. Young, P., & Akerstrom, M. (2016). Meet the digital naturals. In W. T. Coombs, J. Falheimer, M. Heide and P. Young (Eds.), Strategic communication, social media and democracy: The challenge of the digital naturals (1-10). New York, NY: Routledge.