Volume 4, Issue 1 (3-2019)                   IJREE 2019, 4(1): 37-46 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Fasa Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran
Abstract:   (361 Views)
This study investigates the effects of gender, teaching experience, and brain dominance on English teachers’ teaching styles. In doing so, 68 English teachers (males and females) were selected from several language institutes in Shiraz, Iran. Considering the degree of teaching experience, the participants were categorized into three groups, namely novices, the moderately experienced, and professionals. Two instruments, including Hemispheric Dominance Test and Teaching Style Questionnaire were used to collect data. Using statistical package for the social science (SPSS) 20, the collected data were analyzed. The results of independent samples t-test revealed that male and female teachers differed significantly in terms of teaching styles, as far as the sub-component “formality” was concerned. Furthermore, the results of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test indicated that teaching styles in the three groups of teachers significantly differed. However, the analysis of MANOVA regarding the difference between brain dominance and teaching styles did not reveal any significant difference. Some related issues were also discussed.
 
Full-Text [PDF 448 kb]   (94 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |

References
1. Akbari, E., & Karimnia, A. (2017). Learning style preferences in male and female professional translators. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 10(20), 1-16.
2. Albaili, M. A. (1996). Inferred hemispheric style and problem-solving performance. Perceptual and motor skills, 83(2), 427-434. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.427 [DOI:10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.427] [PMID]
3. Aliakbari, M., & Soltani, N. (2009). Variation of learning styles among Iranian EFL learners: Effects of culture, language background and gender. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. Centre for Enhancing English Learning and Teaching: Hong Kong. Retrieved from www.paaljapan.org/conference2011/mate/CFP_16thPAAL.pdf
4. Badjanova, J., Pipere, A., & Ilisko, D. (2017). Gender identity of students and teachers: Implications for a sustainable future. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(2), 138-153. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2017-0019 [DOI:10.1515/jtes-2017-0019]
5. Baleghizadeh, S., & Shakouri, M. (2014). The effect of gender and teaching experience on Iranian ESP instructors' teaching styles. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 979-989. http://jehdnet.com/journals/jehd/Vol_3_No_2_June_2014/59.pdf
6. Baradaran, A. (2016). The Relationship between teaching styles and autonomy among Iranian female EFL teachers, teaching at advanced levels. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 223. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/57538 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v9n3p223]
7. Brew, C. R. (2002). Kolb's learning style instrument: Sensitive to gender. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 373-390. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0013164402062002011 [DOI:10.1177/0013164402062002011]
8. Davis, E. C., Nur, H., & Ruru, S. A. A. (1994). Helping teachers and students understand learning styles. English Teaching Forum, 32(3), 12-38.
9. Evans, C. (2004). Exploring the relationship between cognitive style and teaching style. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 509-530. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144341042000228870 [DOI:10.1080/0144341042000228870]
10. Faruji, L. F. (2012). Teachers' teaching styles at English language institutes in Iran. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2(1), 364-373. http://ijsse.com/sites/default/files/issues/2012/volume%202%20issue%201%20Jan%202012/paper%2028/paper-28.pdf
11. Felder, R. M., & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1) 21-31. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00767.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00767.x]
12. Fischer, D., Aubrecht, E. L., Bruck, M., Ditges, L., Gathen, L., Jahns, M., & Wellmann, C. (2015). UN global action programme and education for sustainable development: A critical appraisal of the evidence base. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6(1), 5-20. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2015-0001 [DOI:10.1515/dcse-2015-0001]
13. Fives, H. (2010). Examining the factor structure of the teachers' sense of efficacy scale. Experimental Education, 78(1), 118-134. https://www.montclair.edu/profilepages/media/1391/user/Fives&Buehl_2010_JXE.pdf
14. Frank, M. I. (1984). A child's brain: The impact of advanced research on cognitive and social behaviors (Vol. 16, No. 1-2). NY: Psychology Press.
15. Gedzune, G. (2015). Awakening pre-service teachers to children's social exclusion in the classroom. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6(1), 95-109. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/dcse/6/1/article-p95.xml
16. Gorrell, J., & Dharmadasa, K. H. (1994). Perceived efficacy of pre-service and in-service Sri Lankan teachers. International Education, 24(1), 23.
17. Grady, M. P. (1984). Teaching and brain research: Guidelines for the classroom. London: Longman.
18. Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhance learning by understanding learning and teaching style. College Teaching, 48, 1-12. https://www.amazon.com/Teaching-Style-Practical-Enhancing-Understanding/dp/0964507110
19. Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational Leadership, 62(3), 21-26. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ725955
20. Halpern, D. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. NY: Psychology Press. [DOI:10.4324/9780203816530]
21. Heimlich, J. E., & Norland, E. (1994). Developing teaching style in adult education. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass, Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104.
22. James, A. (2007). Teaching the male brain: How boys think, feel, and learn in school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23. Kane, N., & Kane, M. (1979). Comparison of right & left hemisphere functions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23(1), 157-67. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ206439 [DOI:10.1177/001698627902300126]
24. Karimnia, A. (2003). The effect of speaker's and listener's gender on listening comprehension. Indian Journal of applied linguistics, 29(1), 99-107. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ662938
25. Karimnia. A., & Afshari. S. (2014). The effect of translators' learning style on translation quality of expressive texts. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(1), 42-49.
26. Kazlauskiene, A., Gaucaite, R., & Juodaityte, A. (2011). Informing society about preschool education and educational support in the context of sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 2(1), 32-45. https://content.sciendo.com/abstract/journals/dcse/2/1/article-p32.xml [DOI:10.2478/v10230-011-0002-6]
27. Keri, G. (2002). Degrees of congruence between instructor and student styles regarding student satisfaction. Radical Pedagogy, 4(1), 42–50.
28. Kotaman, H. (2010). Turkish early childhood educators' sense of teacher efficacy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), 603-616. https://www.redalyc.org/html/2931/293122002008/
29. Nouraey, P., & Karimnia, A. (2016). The impact of rhythm and gender on spelling output of Iranian EFL learners: A cross-sectional study. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(2), 53-63. http://jhss-khazar.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/R302.19.2016.revised_3-1.pdf
30. Ojure, L., & Sherman, T. (2001). Learning styles. Education Week American Education's Newspaper of Record, November Issue.
31. Rahimi, M., & Asadollahi, F. (2012). Teaching styles of Iranian EFL teachers: Do gender, age, and experience make a difference? International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(2), 157-164. doi:10.5539/ijel.v2n2p157 [DOI:10.5539/ijel.v2n2p157]
32. Saleh, A. (2001). Brain hemisphericity and academic majors: A correlation study. College Student Journal, 35(2), 193. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-77399626/brain-hemisphericity-and-academic-majors-a-correlation
33. Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1997). Efficacy and experience: Perceptions of efficacy among pre-service and practicing teachers. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(4), 214-221. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ553068
34. Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns: A classroom teacher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35. Tavakoli, M., & Karimnia, A. (2017). Dominant and gender-specific tendencies in the use of discourse markers: Insights from EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 7(2), 1-9. http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/11603 [DOI:10.5430/wjel.v7n2p1]
36. Torrance, E. P. (1982). Hemisphericity and creative functioning. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 15(3), 29–37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ262568
37. Vitale, B. M. (1982). Unicorns are real: A right-brained approach to learning. Rolling Hills Estates, CA: Jalmar Press.
38. Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migrant education. Adelaide, South Australia: National Curriculum Research Council.
39. Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers' sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 181. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0232/6129b6bbddbe9034ee701fc65fde89be698c.pdf [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181]