1. Amiryousefi, M., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Definitions, issues, and its implications for English teachers. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 159-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p159 [
DOI:10.5539/elt.v3n4p159]
2. Atai, M. R., & Sadr, L. (2008). A cross-cultural study of hedging devices in discussion section of applied linguistics research articles. Teaching English Language (Teaching English Language and Literature Society of Iran), 2(7), 1-22. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=162198
3. Beauvais, P. J. (1989). A speech act theory of metadiscourse. Written communication, 6(1), 11-30. [
DOI:10.1177/0741088389006001002]
4. Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse. J. Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 279-296. [
DOI:10.1177/0741088389006001002]
5. Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113. [
DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003]
6. Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825. [
DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004]
7. Ebadi, S., Rawdhan, A. S., & Marjal, B. E. (2015). A comparative study of the use of metadiscourse markers in Persian and English academic papers. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(4), 28-41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276028305_A_Comparative_Study_of_the_Use_of_Metadicourse_Markers_in_Persian_and_English_Academic_Papers
8. Falahati, R. (2006). The use of hedging across different disciplines and rhetorical sections of research articles. Proceedings of the 22nd North West Linguistics Conference (NWLC22), Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, 1, 99-112.
9. Ghahari, S. H., & Zarghami, M. (2007). Schizophrenia .Tehran: Qhatre Publication.
10. Ghahremani Mina, K., & Biria, R. (2017). Exploring interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers in discussion sections of social and medical science articles. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(4), 11-29. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-71-en.html [
DOI:10.29252/ijree.2.4.11]
11. Gholami, J., & Ilghami, R. (2016). Metadiscourse markers in biological research articles and journal impact factor: Non-native writers vs. native writers. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 44(4), 349-360. doi:10.1002/bmb.20961 [
DOI:10.1002/bmb.20961]
12. Gholami, M., Tajalli, G., & Shokrpour, N. (2014). An investigation of metadiscourse markers in English medical texts and their Persian translation based on Hyland's model. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 1-41. http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/An-Investigation-Of-Metadiscourse-Markers-In-English-Medical-Texts-And-Their-Persian-Translation-Based-On-Hylands-Model2.pdf
13. Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of pragmatics, 43(11), 2795-2809. [
DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007]
14. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles (Vol. 54). John Benjamins Publishing. doi: [
DOI:10.1075/pbns.54]
15. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 479-480. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00593_9.x [
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00593_9.x]
16. Intaraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M. S. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 253-272. [
DOI:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90012-8]
17. Jiang, H., & Bian, N. (2008). Use of metadiscourse in allocating SLA learners' attention. Sino-US English Teaching, 5(11). doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2008.11.001
18. Jomaa, N. J., & Alia, M. M. (2019). Functional analyses of metadiscourse markers in L2 students' academic writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10(1), 361-381. [
DOI:10.24093/awej/vol10no1.30]
19. Karimi, K., Maleki, M., & Farnia, M. (2017). Metadiscourse markers in the abstract sections of Persian and English law articles. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 5(18), 69-83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316167809_Metadiscourse_Markers_in_the_Abstract_Sections_of_Persian_and_English_Law_Articles
20. Khedri, M., Heng, C. S., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 319-331. [
DOI:10.1177/1461445613480588]
21. Kim, C. H., & Suh, H. W. (2014). Epistemic rhetorical stance: Hedges and boosters in L1 and L2 students' English writings. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 22(2), 61-93. doi: 10.24303/lakdoi.2014.22.2.61 [
DOI:10.24303/lakdoi.2014.22.2.61]
22. Kuhi, D., & Mojood, M. (2014). Metadiscourse in Newspaper Genre: A Cross-linguistic Study of English and Persian Editorials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1046-1055. [
DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.515]
23. Marandi, S. (2003). Metadiscourse in Persian/English master's theses. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 23-24. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=5105
24. Moghadam, F. D. (2017). Persuasion in journalism: A study of metadiscourse in texts by native speakers of English and Iranian EFL Wwriters. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(6), 428-434. doi:10.17507/tpls.0706.11 [
DOI:10.17507/tpls.0706.11]
25. Metzl, J. (2011). The protest psychosis: How schizophrenia became a black disease. New York: Beacon Press.
26. Oldham, J., & Bone, S. (1994). Paranoia. Madison: International Universities Press.
27. Peyvastegar, M. (2012). Paranoia. Tehran: Avaye Noor Publication.
28. Pooresfahani, A. F., Khajavy, G. H., & Vahidnia, F. (2012). A contrastive study of metadiscourse elements in research articles written by Iranian applied linguistics and engineering writers in English. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 88-96. [
DOI:10.5430/elr.v1n1p88]
29. Samaie, M., Khosravian, F., & Boghayeri, M. (2014). The frequency and types of hedges in research article Introductions by Persian and English native authors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1678-1685. [
DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.593]
30. Tavakoli, M., Amirian, Z., & Moslemi, F. (2012). Analysis of interactional metadiscourse markers across applied linguistics disciplines: Focusing on EFL learners' perception. Iranian EFL Journal, 8(5), 99-113.
31. Toumi, N. (2009). A model for the investigation of reflexive metadiscourse in research articles. Language Studies Working Papers, 1, 64-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285473524_A_model_for_investigation_of_reflexive_metadiscourse_in_research_articles_University_of_Reading
32. Yang, H. (2006). A comparative study of scientific hedging by Chinese writers and English writers. Language Education papers, 3(3), 58-62.
33. Yazdani, S., Sharifi, S., & Elyassi, M. (2014). Interactional metadiscourse in English and Persian news articles about 9/11. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 428. [
DOI:10.4304/tpls.4.2.428-434]
34. Vande Kopple, W. J. (1997). Refining and Applying Views of Metadiscourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (48th, Phoenix, AZ, March 12-15, 1997), 1-19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED411539.pdf
35. Vande, K. W. (1984). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93. doi: 10.2307/357609 https://www.jstor.org/stable/357609 [
DOI:10.2307/357609]
36. Williams, J. (1980). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Boston: Scott Foresman. The University of Chicago Press, 1-208.
37. Zarei, G. R., & Mansoori, S. (2007). Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 3(2), 24-40. http://research.iaun.ac.ir/pd/mansouri/pdfs/PaperM_9454.pdf
38. Zarei, G. R., & Mansoori, S. (2011). A contrastive study on metadiscourse elements used in humanities vs. non humanities across Persian and English. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 42-50. doi: 10.5539/elt v4n1p42 [
DOI:10.5539/elt.v4n1p42]