Volume 2, Issue 1 (3-2017)                   IJREE 2017, 2(1): 42-48 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Haghighi M, Rahimy R. The Effect of L2 Minimal Pairs Practice on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Pronunciation Accuracy. IJREE. 2017; 2 (1)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-32-en.html
Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon-Iran
Abstract:   (3328 Views)

The aim of the current study was to investigate whether L2 minimal pairs practice would have an effect on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ pronunciation accuracy. For this purpose, 30 Iranian intermediate EFL learners at Simin institute participated in the experiment of the study. The selection of subjects was done from among 150 EFL learners at intermediate level. In order to make subjects homogenized an SPT was used, then they divided into two groups of 15 who were assigned to experimental and control group randomly. A pre-test of pronunciation accuracy was administered to both groups, then the experimental group received 5 sessions of teaching L2 pronunciation as well as minimal pairs practice (MPP) while the control group  received a placebo, in other words, teaching L2 pronunciation via the existing method. After the treatment again the same test was administered as posttest to both groups of the study. The data obtained from the tests were analyzed via independent samples T-test between the posttest scores of experimental and control group to see whether there is a difference between performance of the groups and the paired-sample T-tests was used between the pretest and the posttest of each group to show the progress. The results revealed that Iranian EFL learners in the experimental group performed better and received higher score in pronunciation test after 5 session of treatment.   

Full-Text [PDF 449 kb]   (1404 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Bowen, C. (2012). Minimal Pair Therapies. Retrieved April 30, 2016 from http://www.speech-language therapy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=79:mp&catid=11
2. Goh, C. C. (2000). A Cognitive Perspective on Language Learners' Listening Comprehension Problems. System 28(1), 55-75. [DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3]
3. Isaacs, T. (2009). Integrating Form and Meaning in L2 Pronunciation Instruction. Retrieved September 5, 2015 from http://www.teslcanadajournal.ca/index.php/tesl/article/view/1034 [DOI:10.18806/tesl.v27i1.1034]
4. Keshavarz, M. H. (2006). A Practical Course of English Phonetics and Phonology. SAMT publication, Tehran.
5. Kutszik, L. (2005).Minimal Pair Card Game for Improving Pronunciation and Listening. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XI, No. 9, September 2005. Retrieved on September 9, 2015 from http://iteslj.org/
6. Ladefoged, P. (2010). A Course in Phonetics. Tehran: Jungle Publication. [PMCID]
7. Nilsen, D. L. F., & Nilsen, A. P. (1993). Pronunciation Contrast in English. Regents Publishing Company, INC. [PMCID]
8. Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2012). A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners' English Pronunciation Learning and the Strategies for Instruction. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 119-128. Retrieved September 23, 2015 from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_3_February_2012/17.pdf
9. Randall, M. (2007). Memory, Psychology, and Second Language Learning. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia. [DOI:10.1075/lllt.19]
10. Van den Doel, R. (2007). International Intelligibility in EFL. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 28-38.
11. Yates, L. (2002). Setting Goals for Teaching Pronunciation. AMEP fact sheet, Adult Migrant English Program Research Centre.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb