Volume 3, Issue 1 (3-2018)                   IJREE 2018, 3(1): 1-10 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi Selangor
Abstract:   (651 Views)
The English literature component has been around in the Malaysian Education system since 2000. However, literature as a subject has always been learned more for transactional purposes rather than for its aesthetic value. Basically, a regurgitation of knowledge from years of learning, poured out in one major examination. In this research, the researcher applies a teaching method, called the literature circle in a classroom to study how it could be an effective way to learning literature beyond the classroom and for completing exam papers. Accompanying the literature circle activity is the writing of personal responses to gauge the students’ understanding and views on the literature component being studied. This paper discusses the findings of the study that investigates the effect of literature circle in the students’ personal responses and also to examine the students’ perception towards literature circle. The findings of this study, obtained via qualitative and quantitative instruments, comprising of observations, interviews, personal responses, and questionnaires, provide insights for educators and other researchers into another dimension of the teaching and learning of literature component.
 
Full-Text [PDF 549 kb]   (100 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Anon. (2014). 6 Methods of data collection and analysis. www.open.edu/openlearncreate/mod/resource/view.php?id=52658 [13 December 2016].
2. Bedee, S. (2010). The impact of literature circles on reading motivation and comprehension for students in a second grade classroom. Master Thesis, Bowling Green State University.
3. Carter, R., & Long, M. (1991). Teaching literature. London: Longman.
4. Curriculum Planning & Development Divison Ministry of Education. (2013). Literature in English Teaching Syllabus 2013 Lower and UpperSecondary.
5. Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs and reading groups. Markham, ONT: Stenhouse Publishers.
6. Govindarajoo, M. V., & Mukundan, J. (2013). Young adult literature in the Malaysian secondary school. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 77-88. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n11p77 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n11p77 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v6n11p77]
7. Hirvela, A. (1996). Reader-response theory and ELT. ELT Journal, 50(2), 127-134. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/elt/50.2.127]
8. Kaur, P., & Mahmor, N. (2014). Examining the role of the English literature component in the Malaysian English curriculum. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134 (September 2012), 119–124. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.229]
9. Malaysian Examinations Council. (2013). Literature in English.
10. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysian Education Blueprint, 2013–2025.
11. Ramlan, N. (2009). Teachers' preferred practices in teaching literature component in Kuching–Samarahan divisions secondary schools. Project Report (B. Sc.), Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. [PMID]
12. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
13. Subramaniam, G., & Vethami, M. E. (2003). Teaching of literature in ESL/EFL contexts. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi.
14. Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research methods in Education: An introduction. London: Pearson.
15. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications. [PMCID]
16. Zaidah, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6.
17. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1–6. http://eprints.utm.my/8221/4/48-case-study-as-a-research method.html_Itemid%3D1328 [15 December 2016].