1. Acat, B., & Dönmez, İ. (2009). To compare student centered education and teacher centered education in primary science and technology lesson in terms of learning environments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1805-1809. [
DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.320]
2. Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Nghia, T., Boud, D., Johnson, L., & Patrick, C. (2019). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 304-316. [
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2019.1639613]
3. Boud, D. (2013). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Routledge. [
DOI:10.4324/9781315041520]
4. Boumediene, H., Berrahal, F. K., & Harji, M. B. (2016). The effectiveness of portfolio assessment on EFL students' writing performance: The case of third year secondary students in Algeria. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(3), 119-127. [
DOI:10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p119]
5. Brown, S., & Glasner, A. (2007). Evaluar en la Universidad. Problemas y nuevos enfoques. Madrid. Narcea S. A. Ediciones.
6. Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367-393). Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks. [
DOI:10.4135/9781452218649.n21]
7. Butler, Y. G., & Lee. J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5-31. doi: 10.1177/0265532209346370 [
DOI:10.1177/0265532209346370]
8. Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Lou, S. J. (2011). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher assessment, student self-assessment and peer assessment in a web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers and Education, 58(1), 303-320. [
DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.005]
9. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93-121. doi: 10.1191/0265532205lt298oa [
DOI:10.1191/0265532205lt298oa]
10. Dhindsa, H., Omar, K., & Waldrip, B. (2007). Upper secondary Bruneian science students' perceptions of assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1261-1280. [
DOI:10.1080/09500690600991149]
11. Dikel, M. R. (2009). A guide to going online for self-assessment tools. https://www.vault.com/blogs/job-search/a-guide-to-going-online-for-self-assessment-tools
12. Esfandiari, R., & Myford, C. M. (2013). Severity differences among self-assessors, peer assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays. Assessing Writing, 18(2), 111-131. [
DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002]
13. Falchikov, N. (2013). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge. [
DOI:10.4324/9780203220993]
14. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-430. [
DOI:10.3102/00346543059004395]
15. Hinett, K. (2002). Improving learning through reflection-Part two. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228596017_Improving_learning_through_reflection-part_two
16. James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
17. Jay, J., & Owen, A. (2016). Providing opportunities for student self-assessment: The impact on the acquisition of psychomotor skills in occupational therapy students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1176-1192. [
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2015.1071317]
18. Javaherbakhsh, M. R. (2010). The impact of self-assessment on Iranian EFL learners' writing skill. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 213- 218. [
DOI:10.5539/elt.v3n2p213]
19. Jones, J. (2010). The role of assessment for learning in the management of primary to secondary transition: Implications for language teachers. Language Learning Journal, 38(2), 175-191. [
DOI:10.1080/09571730902928052]
20. Kearney, S., Perkins, T., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2016). Using self and peer-assessment for summative purposes: Analyzing the relative validity of the AASL (authentic assessment for sustainable learning) model. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 840-853. [
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2015.1039484]
21. Keith, J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645. [
DOI:10.1080/01443410500345172]
22. Khodashenas, M. R., & Rakhshi, F. (2017). The effect of electronic portfolio assessment on the writing performance of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 2(3), 67-71. [
DOI:10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.3.67]
23. Khorami Fard, S., & Derakhshi, Z. (2019). On the role of dynamic assessment on promotion of writing linguistic accuracy among EFL learners: An interventionist model. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 4(2), 14-28. [
DOI:10.29252/ijree.4.2.14]
24. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2019). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-211. [
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679]
26. Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9thed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290. [
DOI:10.1080/13562510600680582]
28. Liu, C. C., Lu, K. H., Wu, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The impact of peer review on creative self-efficacy and learning performance in Web 2.0 learning activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 286-297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.286
29. Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer, and teacher assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75-100. [
DOI:10.1177/0265532208097337]
30. Meihami, H., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2016). An emic perspective toward challenges and solutions of self- and peer-assessment in writing courses. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(9), 1-20. doi:10.1186/s40862-016-0014-7 [
DOI:10.1186/s40862-016-0014-7]
31. Mosmery, P., & Barzegar, R. (2015). The effects of using peer, self and teacher-assessment on Iranian EFL learners' writing ability at three levels of task complexity. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(4), 15-27. [
DOI:10.5861/ijrsll.2015.928]
32. Neary, M., Saunders, G., Hagyard, A., & Derricott, D. (2014). Student as producer: Research-engaged teaching: An institutional strategy. New York: Higher Education Academy.
33. Nunan, D. (2003). Second language teaching and learning. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
34. Ozogul, G., & Sullivan, H. (2007). Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self and peer evaluators. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 393-410. [
DOI:10.1007/s11423-007-9052-7]
35. Pourvandi Vangah, F., Jafarpur, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2016). Portfolio assessment and process writing: Its effect on EFL students' L2 writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(3), 224-246. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/307
36. Ramani, S., Konings, K. D., Mann, K. V., Pisarski, E. E., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2018). About politeness, face, and feedback: Exploring resident and faculty perceptions of how institutional feedback culture influences feedback practices. Academic Medicine, 93(9), 1348-1358. [
DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002193]
37. Rezaee, A., Rahimi, S., & Mehrabi, M. (2019). Cultivating grammar knowledge of EFL learners through informed peer-dynamic assessment. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 4(3), 70-83. [
DOI:10.29252/ijree.4.3.70]
38. Schut, S., Driessen, E., van Tartwijk, J., van der Vleuten, C., & Heeneman, S. (2018). Stakes in the eye of the beholder: An international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment. Medical Education, 52(6), 654-663. [
DOI:10.1111/medu.13532]
39. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process and students' reflections. Journal for Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002]
40. Suri, H., & Krishnan, S. (2019). Assessment hurdles in core first year courses in Australian universities: Are we trying to catch out students? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 251-265. [
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2019.1632795]
41. Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgment: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467-481. [
DOI:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3]
42. Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015). The educational alliance as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(5), 609-614. [
DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560]
43. Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasant, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students' future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 1-17. http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol8/iss1/5
44. Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. [
DOI:10.1080/00405840802577569]
45. Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840-854. [
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396]
46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Watling, C., & LaDonna, K. (2019). Where philosophy meets culture: Exploring how coaches conceptualize their roles. Medical Education, 53(5), 467-476. [
DOI:10.1111/medu.13799]
48. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design: Expanded (2nd ed.) Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
49. Wood, W. B. (2009). Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 25, 93-112. [
DOI:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175306]
50. Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247-1262. [
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091]
51. Zare Toofan, Z., Vaseghi, R., & Zare, M. (2019). Iranian EFL learners' perceptions toward paper assessment in mid-term and final exams in an English language institute. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 4(3), 21-41. [
DOI:10.29252/ijree.4.3.21]
52. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-247-en.html
53. Zohrabi, M., Torabi, M.A., & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student-centered learning: English language in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 18-30. [
DOI:10.5539/ells.v2n3p18]