1. Afghari, A. (2007). A sociopragmatic study of apology speech act realization patterns in Persian. Speech Communication, 49(3), 177-185. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2007.01.003 [
DOI:10.1016/j.specom.2007.01.003]
2. Ahmadi, A. (2002). On the relationship between field dependence independence and the use of listening comprehension strategies by Iranian EFL students (case study: female English majors in Shiraz). Unpublished Master's Thesis. Shiraz University, Iran.
3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction, and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347-384. doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.017 [
DOI:10.1515/iprg.2011.017]
5. Bayat, N. (2013). A study on the use of speech acts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 213-221. Retrieved from: www.sciencedirect.com [
DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.057]
6. Bergman, M. L., & Kasper, G. (1993). Perception and performance in native and nonnative apology. In G. Kasper, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 82-107). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Biook, B., & Fathi, M. (2009). The relationship between reading performance and field dependence/independence cognitive styles. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(1), 49-62. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=201535
8. Birjandi, P., & Rezaei, S. (2010). Developing a multiple-choice discourse completion test of interlanguage pragmatics for Iranian EFL learners. ILI Language Teaching Journal (Special Issue: Proceedings of the First Conference on ELT in the Islamic World), 6(1, 2), 43-58.
9. Bosacki, S., Innerd, W., & Towson, S. (1997). Field independence-dependence and self-esteem in preadolescents: Does gender make a difference? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(60), 691-704. [
DOI:10.1023/A:1022396625462]
10. Brown, D. (2007). Principles of language teaching and learning. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.
11. Carroll, F., & Sapon, E. (1988). Sex differences in English language acculturation and learning strategies among Vietnamese adults aged 40 and over in the United States. Sex Roles, 19, 747-758. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00288990]
12. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press: 251p.
13. Davies, K. A., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). Looking back, taking stock, moving forward: Investigating gender in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3), 381-404. doi.org/10.2307/3588346 [
DOI:10.2307/3588346]
14. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Fajen, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC Journal, 30(2), 101-113. doi.org/10.1177/003368829903000206 [
DOI:10.1177/003368829903000206]
16. Fatemi, A. H., Vahedi, V. S., & Seyyedrezaie, S. Z. (2014). The effects of top-down/bottom-up processing and field-dependent/field-independent cognitive style on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(4), 686-693. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.4.686-693 [
DOI:10.4304/tpls.4.4.686-693]
17. Griffin, T., & Franklins, D. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.x [
DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.x]
18. Haji Maibodi. A. (2016). Investigating the effects of individual differences on the speech act of apology in institutional discourse. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 3(2), 71-94. http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_955.html
19. Haji Maibodi, A., Fazilatfar, A. M., & Allami, H. (2016). Exploring subjectivity in verbal reports of Iranian EFL learners in institutional discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(5), 252-263. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.252 [
DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.252]
20. Hansen, J. R., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The relationship of field dependent/independent cognitive styles to foreign language. Language Learning, 31(2), 349-367. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01389.x [
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01389.x]
21. Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2018). Effects of metalinguistic feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian field (in) dependent L2 learners' writing ability. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 141-161. doi:10.22055/rals.2018.13797
22. Hashemian, M., Jafarpour, A., & Adibpour, M. (2015). Exploring relationships between field (In) dependence, multiple intelligences, and L2 reading performance among Iranian L2 learners. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 40-63. doi: 10.22055/rals.2015.11259
23. Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman Group.
24. Holmes, J. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics. (3rd Ed.), (pp.164-168). England, UK: Pearson, Longman Group.
25. Ishihara, N., & Cohen. A. D. (2010). Learners' pragmatics: potential causes of divergence. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 75-96). Harlow: Longman.
26. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). The role of instruction in learning second language pragmatics. Language Learning, 52(1), 237-273. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2002.tb00028.x]
27. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 149-169. doi: [
DOI:10.1017/S0272263100014868]
28. Khalili Sabet, M., & Mohamadi, S. H. (2013). The relationship between field independence/dependence styles and reading comprehension abilities of EFL readers. Unpublished Master dissertation. Iran. [
DOI:10.4304/tpls.3.11.2141-2150]
29. Khodadady, E., Bagheri, N., & Charbgoo, Z. (2016). Primary school students' cognitive styles and their achievement in English as a foreign language. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 851-858. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.04 [
DOI:10.17507/jltr.0705.04]
30. Khodadady, E., & Zeynali, S. (2012). Field-dependence/independence cognitive style and performance on the IELTS listening comprehension. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 622-635. doi:10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2389 [
DOI:10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2389]
31. Kuriscak, L. (2010). The effect of individual-level variables on speech act performance. In A. Martíneze-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 23-39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [
DOI:10.1075/lllt.26.02kur]
32. Luk, S. C. (2002). The relationship between cognitive styles and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 137-147. [
DOI:10.1111/1467-8535.00055]
33. Marinova-Todd, S. H., Bradford, M. D., & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 9-34. doi: 10.2307/3588095 http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0039-8322%28200021%2934%3A1%3C9%3ATMAAAL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M [
DOI:10.2307/3588095]
34. Nilforooshan, N., & Afghari, A. (2007). The effect of field dependence-independence as a source of variation in EFL learners' writing performance. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 1(2), 58-70. http://journaldatabase.info/articles/effect_field_dependence-independence.html
35. Reid, J. M. (2002). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. U.S.A., Brooks Cole Thomson Learning.
36. Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, note taking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 508-517. [
DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.508]
37. Rostampour, M., & Niroomand, S. M. (2014). Field dependence/independence cognitive styles: Are they significant at different levels of vocabulary knowledge? International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2(1), 52-57. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.2n.1p.52 [
DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.2n.1p.52]
38. Sabaté i Dalmau, M., & Curelli Gotor, H. (2007). From "sorry very much" to "I'm ever so sorry": Acquisitional patterns in L2 apologies by Catalan learners of English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), 287-315. doi: 10.1515/IP.2007.014 [
DOI:10.1515/IP.2007.014]
39. Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). Does field independence relate to performance on communicative language tests? Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3), 79-85. doi: 10.26634/jet.3.3.716 [
DOI:10.26634/jet.3.3.716]
40. Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A (2007). Is field dependence or Independence a predicator of EFL reading performance? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 82-108. [
DOI:10.18806/tesl.v24i2.140]
41. Shalbafan, K. (1996). On the role field dependence/field independence in Iranian EFL learners' writing ability. Unpublished master's thesis. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran.
42. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. [
DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2]
43. Taguchi, N. (2013). Individual differences and development of speech act production. Applied Research on English Language, 2(2), 1-16. https://www.sid.ir/En/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=329224
44. Takahashi, S. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 90-120. [
DOI:10.1093/applin/amh040]
45. Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1998). Field dependence-independence cognitive style and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 227-251. [
DOI:10.1007/BF03173091]
46. Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [
DOI:10.1515/9783110885286]
47. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field- dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64. doi: 10.2307/1169967 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1169967 [
DOI:10.2307/1169967]
48. Yaghoubi, R. (1994). The relationship between field-independent/field-dependent cognitive style Persian students and their English language proficiency. Unpublished master's thesis, Allameh Tabatabaii University, Iran.