Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2020)                   IJREE 2020, 5(1): 36-52 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Namaziandost E, Imani A, Sharafi S, Banari R. Exploring the Relationship between Listening Strategies Used by Iranian EFL Senior High School Students and Their Listening Comprehension Problems. IJREE 2020; 5 (1)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-221-en.html
Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
Abstract:   (4541 Views)
The present study explored listening strategy use among a group of Iranian EFL senior high school students (N = 60). More specifically, it aimed to identify 1) the strategies used more often by participants, 2) the relationship between listening strategy use and listening comprehension problems. In this study, listening problems included input, context, listener, process, affect, and task problems while the listening strategies comprised of cognitive, meta-cognitive, and socio-affective strategies. To collect the needed data, a questionnaire was distributed among the participants. After collecting the data and analyzing them through SPSS software, the results revealed that ‘input’ and ‘affect’ were two main listening comprehension problems the learners suffered from. Results also indicated that the main listening strategy used by learners was meta-cognitive strategy. The relationship between listening problems and strategy used among the learners was statistically significant and negative. Outcomes propose that it is crucial for second language teachers to be aware of the different listening problems so as to enable listeners to utilize the appropriate strategies.

Full-Text [PDF 446 kb]   (1186 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

1. Abedi, P., Keshmirshekan, M. H., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The comparative effect of flipped classroom instruction versus traditional instruction on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' English composition writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research,
2. 6(4), 43-56. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/1036
3. Abedi, P., Namaziandost, E., & Akbari, S. (2019). The impact of flipped classroom instruction on Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners' writing skill. English Literature and Language Review, 5(9), 164-172. [DOI:10.32861/ellr.59.164.172]
4. Bidabadi, F., & Yamat, H. (2011). The relationship between listening strategies used by
5. Iranian EFL freshman university students and their listening proficiency levels.
6. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 26-32. doi: 10.5539/elt.v4n1p26 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v4n1p26]
7. Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. In D. J. Mendelsohn, & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 113-131). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press, Inc.
8. Byrnes, H. (1984). The role of listening comprehension: A theoretical base. Foreign Language Annals, 17(4), 317-329. [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb03235.x]
9. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227-249. [DOI:10.2307/3586733]
10. Chen, A. H. (2013). EFL listeners' strategy development and listening problems: A process-based study. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 10(3), 81-101.
11. Chen, K. T. (2010). University EFL learners' awareness of metacognitive listening comprehension strategies in Taiwan. Cross-University International Conference on English Teaching, Taipei, Taiwan.
12. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11. [DOI:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11]
13. Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1992). Student perceptions, problems and strategies in second [DOI:10.1177/003368829202300205]
15. language lecture comprehension. RELC journal, 23(2), 60-80. [DOI:10.1177/003368829202300205]
16. Goh, C. C. M. (1999). How much do learners know about the factors that influence their
17. listening comprehension? Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 17-41. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ee28/87c82a7d39405935bdaabc040f6cfba57efb.pdf
18. Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension [DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3]
19. problems. System, 28(1), 55-75. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3 [DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3]
20. Graham, S., & Santos, D. (2015). Strategies for second language listening: Current scenarios and improved pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. [DOI:10.1057/9781137410528_8]
21. Guo, N., & Wills, R. (2006). An investigation of factors influencing English listening comprehension and possible measures for improvement. Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference Parramatta. https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2005/guo05088.pdf
22. Hamouda, A. (2012). Listening comprehension problems-voices from the classroom. The
23. Language in India, 12(2), 1-49. http://hrmars.com/admin/pics/1882.pdf
24. Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners' perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137-153. [DOI:10.1080/07908310008666595]
25. Hashemifardnia, A., Namaziandost, E., Shafiee, S. (2018). The effect of implementing flipped classrooms on Iranian junior high school students' reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(6), 665-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0806.17 [DOI:10.17507/tpls.0806.17]
26. Holden, W. R. (2004). Facilitating listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. Bulletin of Hokuriku University, 28, 257-266. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d766/2d12f661ed0b96f7e67d6b4b2c8ca30a0e17.pdf
27. Juan, W. X., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2013). English listening comprehension problems of students
28. from China learning English in Malaysia. Language in India, 13(4), 14009-14022. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a824/d5aac5b6f65a12b8c1c3a0e2ef647fb251b7.pdf?_ga=2.63025199.1613839513.1582715230-1722624921.1551015843
29. Karami, S., & Bagheri, M. (2014). Operationalizing teachers' emotional attitudes towards their students, colleagues and workplace: Result from an EFL context. Journal of Language & Literature, 5(1), 140-149. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Opertionalizing-teachers%E2%80%99-emotional-attitudes-their-Karami-Bagheri/250a2d2167e8027fd8c70eade2373cfa4035a9ee
30. Kassem, H. M. (2015). The relationship between listening strategies used by Egyptian EFL college sophomores and their listening comprehension and self-efficacy. English Language Teaching, 8(2), 153-169. doi:10.5539/elt.v8n2p153 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v8n2p153]
31. Lau, K. L. (2016). Strategy use, listening problems, and motivation of high- and low-proficiency Chinese listeners. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 503-514. [DOI:10.1080/00220671.2015.1134421]
32. Littlewood, W. (1998). Communicative activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lotfi, G. (2012). A questionnaire of beliefs on English language listening comprehension
34. problems: Development and validation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(4), 508-515. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fe11/fab693e27751e12be532c9e981c4f609f841.pdf
35. Mendelson, D. J. (1994). Learning to listen. USA: Dominie Press.
36. Mirshekaran, R., Namaziandost, E., & Nazari, M. (2018). The effects of topic interest and l2 proficiency on writing skill among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(6), 1270-1276. http://www.academypublication.com/ojs/index.php/jltr/article/view/jltr090612701276 [DOI:10.17507/jltr.0906.16]
37. Namaziandost, E., & Ahmadi, S. (2019). The assessment of oral proficiency through holistic and analytic techniques of scoring: A comparative study. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 3(2), 70-82. https://www.journalagent.com/alrj/pdfs/ALRJ_3_2_70_82.pdf [DOI:10.14744/alrj.2019.83792]
38. Namaziandost, E., Hafezian, M., & Shafiee, S. (2018). Exploring the association among working memory, anxiety and Iranian EFL learners' listening comprehension. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(20), 1-17. [DOI:10.1186/s40862-018-0061-3]
39. Namaziandost, E., & Nasri, M. (2019a). A meticulous look at Long's (1981) interaction hypothesis: does it have any effect on speaking skill? Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(2), 218-230. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/1023
40. Namaziandost, E., Neisi, L., Kheryadi, & Nasri, M. (2019). Enhancing oral proficiency through cooperative learning among intermediate EFL learners: English learning motivation in focus. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-15. [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2019.1683933]
41. Namaziandost, E., Neisi, L., Mahdavirad, F., & Nasri, M. (2019). The relationship between listening comprehension problems and strategy usage among advance EFL learners. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1-19. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2019.1691338 [DOI:10.1080/23311908.2019.1691338]
42. Namaziandost, E., Saberi Dehkordi, E., & Shafiee, S. (2019). Comparing the effectiveness of input-based and output-based activities on productive knowledge of vocabulary among pre-intermediate EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4(2), 1-14. [DOI:10.1186/s40862-019-0065-7]
43. Namaziandost, E., Sabzevari, A., & Hashemifardnia, A. (2018). The effect of cultural materials on listening comprehension among Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners: In reference to gender. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-27. [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1560601]
44. Namaziandost, E., Shatalebi, V., & Nasri, M. (2019). The impact of cooperative learning on developing speaking ability and motivation toward learning English. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 83-101. [DOI:10.17323/jle.2019.9809]
45. Nasri, M., Namaziandost, E., & Akbari, S. (2019). Impact of pictorial cues on speaking fluency and accuracy among Iranian pre-intermediate EF learners. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 8(3), 99-109. https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijells/2019p99-109.html [DOI:10.18488/journal.23.2019.83.99.109]
46. Nunan, D. (1997). Second language teaching & learning. Massachusetts: Heinel & Heinel Publishers.
47. O' Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437. [DOI:10.1093/applin/10.4.418]
48. Persulessy, G. H. (1988). Listening improvements Exercises for students of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Peterson, P. W. (2001). Skills and strategies for proficient listening. In M. Celce Murcia (Ed.), teaching English as a second or foreign language (p.69-85). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
50. Pourhosein, G. A., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners' English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977-988. doi:10.4304/jltr.2.5.977-988 [DOI:10.4304/jltr.2.5.977-988]
51. Rahimirad, M., & Zare-ee, A. (2015). Metacognitive strategy instruction as a means to improve listening self-efficacy among Iranian undergraduate learners of English. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 117-132. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085296 [DOI:10.12973/iji.2015.819a]
52. Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. London: Penguin books.
53. Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching: Listening (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis, New York.
54. Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x]
55. Serri, F., Boroujeni, A. J., & Hesabi, A. (2012). Cognitive, metacognitive, and social/affective
56. strategies in listening comprehension and their relationships with individual differences. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 843-849. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.4.843-849 [DOI:10.4304/tpls.2.4.843-849]
57. Shahrokhi, M., Malekian, P., & Sayedi, S. B. (2015). Listening comprehension ability and the use of listening strategies by Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(5), 231-241. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/100/pdf100
58. Shakibaei, G., Shahamat, F., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The effect of using authentic texts on Iranian EFL learners' incidental vocabulary learning: The case of English newspaper. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 2(5), 422-432. doi: 10.32996/ijllt.2019.2.5.47
59. Tahmasbi, S., Hashemifardnia, A., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Standard English or world Englishes: Issues of ownership and preference. Journal of Teaching English Language Studies, 7(3), 83-98. http://www.iaujournals.ir/article_665009_bc918242d35f565d74a0b19073056696.pdf
60. Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x]
61. descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387-409. [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x]
62. Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: [DOI:10.4324/9780203843376]
63. Metacognition in action. Routledge, New York.
64. Vogely, A. (1995). Perceived strategy uses during performance on three authentic listening [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05414.x]
65. tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 41-56. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05414.x]
66. Yaseen, S. R., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2016). Listening comprehension problems and strategies among Kurdish EFL learners. The Iranian EFL Journal, 12(4), 6-27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311793729_Listening_Comprehension_Problems_and_Strategies_among_Kurdish_EFL_Learners
67. Ziafar M., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Linguistics, SLA and lexicon as the unit of language. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 2(5), 245-250. http://www.ijllt.org/linguistics-sla-and-lexicon-as-the-unit-of-language/

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb