Volume 6, Issue 3 (9-2021)                   IJREE 2021, 6(3): 69-85 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shabani G, Abbasi dogolsara S. A Comparative Study on the Effects of Multiple-choice vs. Sentence-writing Modes of Test Practice Manipulation on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Collocation Learning. IJREE. 2021; 6 (3)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-556-en.html
Department of English Langiage, Roudsar and Amlash Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudsar, Iran
Abstract:   (366 Views)
Within the realm of lexis, the area of collocation is of prime importance to producing natural-sounding language for anyone learning a foreign language. This study aimed at investigating the effects of two modes of sentence writing versus multiple-choice test practice manipulation on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ lexical collocation learning. For this purpose, to ensure the homogeneity of the participants, Preliminary English Test (PET) was administered to 87 students studying English at two English institutes of Ofoghhaye Nour and Nourmahdi in Roudsar, Guilan, through which 60 students were selected as the target participants. They were intermediate students with the age range between 17 and 23. They were then divided into two equal comparison groups: Sentence-writing Group (SRG) and Multiple-choice Group (MCG). A piloted pretest of lexical collocation was administered to both groups. Then both groups underwent a 7-session treatment. SRG was treated by the virtue of sentence-writing practice for the target collocations, and MCG was instructed through recognition practice, here multiple-choice practice. After the treatment period, the same version of lexical collocation test was administered to both groups as posttest to examine the effectiveness of the treatments. The results of paired-samples and independent samples t-tests indicated that both groups had collocation gains but the effectiveness of multiple-choice test manipulation on learners’ lexical collocation outweighed that of the sentence-writing mode of test practice manipulation. The implications and recommendations were also presented.

 
Full-Text [PDF 758 kb]   (100 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Abdellah, A. S. (2015). The effect of a program based on the lexical approach on developing English majors' use of collocations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 766-777. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0604.08 [DOI:10.17507/jltr.0604.08]
2. Alemi, M., & Tayebi, A. (2011). The influence of incidental and intentional vocabulary acquisition and vocabulary strategy use on learning L2 vocabularies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 81-98. doi:10.4304/jltr.2.1.81-98 [DOI:10.4304/jltr.2.1.81-98]
3. Bahardoust, M., & Moeine, M. (2012). Lexical and grammatical collocations in writing production of EFL learners. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 5(10), 61-86. http://jal.iaut.ac.ir/article_520093.html
4. Bailey, K. M., & Curtis, A. (2015). Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions, and directions (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.
5. Barcroft, J. (2004). Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20(4), 303-334. [DOI:10.1191/0267658304sr233oa]
6. Bazzaz, F., & Samad, A. (2011). The use of verb-noun collocations in writing stories among Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 158-163. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n3p158 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v4n3p158]
7. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, S., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting the lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245-261. [DOI:10.1191/1362168806lr195oa]
8. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory and Cognition, 36(3), 604-616. [DOI:10.3758/MC.36.3.604]
9. Chan, N., & Kennedy, P. E. (2002). Are multiple-choice exams easier for economics students? A comparison of multiple-choice and equivalent constructed-response exam questions. Southern Economic Journal, 68(4), 957-971. [DOI:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2002.tb00469.x]
10. Chen, M. H. (2008). A study of the English collocation competence of college students in Taiwan. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Applied Foreign Languages, National University of Taiwan, Taipea, Taiwan.
11. Currie, M., & Chiramanee, T. (2010). The effect of the multiple-choice item format on the measurement of knowledge of language structure. Language Testing, 27(4), 471-491. [DOI:10.1177/0265532209356790]
12. Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learnersʼ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26(2), 163-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349431 [DOI:10.1177/0267658309349431]
13. Famularo, L. (2007). The effect of response format and test taking strategies on item difficulty: a comparison of stem-equivalent multiple-choice and constructed-response test items. Boston College.
14. Fernández, R. F., Prahlad, S. R. R., Rubtsova, E., & Sabitov, O. (2009). Collocations in the vocabulary English teaching as a foreign language. Acimed, 19(6), 1-5. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/aci/v19n6/aci06609.pdf
15. Fowle, C. (2002). Vocabulary notebooks: Implementation and outcomes. ELT Journal, 56(4), 380-388. [DOI:10.1093/elt/56.4.380]
16. Hasanabadi, S. (2003). A study of the learning of English lexical and grammatical collocations by Iranian EFL learners. Tabriz College of Letter and Humanities Journal, 46(187), 45-59. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=4505
17. Hashemzadeh, M. (2012). The effect of exercise types on EFL learners' vocabulary retention. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1716-1727. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1716-1727 [DOI:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1716-1727]
18. Hastedt, D., & Sibberns, H. (2005). Differences between multiple choice items and constructed response items in the IEA TIMSS surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2), 145-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.05.007 [DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.05.007]
19. Heidarnezhadian, Q., Aliakbari, M., & Mashhadi, J. (2015). The potential impact of using prefabricated patterns (collocation expressions) on improving writing proficiency among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 9(3), 328-334.
20. Hickson, S., Reed, W. R., & Sander, N. (2012). Estimating the effect on grades of using multiple-choice versus constructive response questions: data from the classroom. Educational Assessment, 17(4), 200-213. [DOI:10.1080/10627197.2012.735915]
21. Hsu, J. M. (2007). Lexical collocations and their relation to the online writing of Taiwanese college English majors and non-English majors. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(2), 192-209. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.2339&rep=rep1&type=pdf
22. Hsu, J., & Chiu, C. (2008). Lexical collocations and their relation to speaking proficiency of college EFL learners in Taiwan. The Asian EFL Journal, 10(1), 181-204. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/lexical-collocations-and-their-relation-to-speaking-proficiency-of-college-efl-learners-in-taiwan/
23. Huang, L. (2007). Knowledge of English collocations: An analysis of Taiwanese EFL learners. In: C. Luke & B. Rubrecht (Eds.), Texas papers in foreign language education: Selected Proceedings from the Texas Foreign Language Education Conference (pp. 113-132). Texas: Texas University, Austin.
24. Hulstijn, J. H., (2012). Incidental learning in second language acquisition. In: C. A. Chapelle (Ed.). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-5). Wiley-Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0530]
25. Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23-59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ689121.pdf
26. In'nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2009). A meta-analysis of test format effects on reading and listening test performance: focus on multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Language Testing, 26(2), 219-244. doi:10.1177/0265532208101006 [DOI:10.1177/0265532208101006]
27. Jones, L. (2004). Testing L2 vocabulary recognition and recall using pictorial and written test items. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 122-143. Retrieved August 7, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/74406/
28. Kasraian, A., & Pakfetrat, B. (2017). The effect of visually-mediated collocations on the elementary EFL learners' vocabulary learning. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 6(1), 71-88. http://jslte.iaushiraz.ac.ir/article_532363.html
29. Keshavarz, M. H., & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test performance: a study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 81-92. [DOI:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00134.x]
30. Keyvanfar, A., & Arya, N. (2009). The impact of context pregnancy on vocabulary retention of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language Literature, 1(1), 31-48. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=201533
31. Kilickaya, F. (2019). Assessing L2 vocabulary through multiple-choice, matching, gap-fill, and word formation items. Online Submission, 43(3), 155-166. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED600110 [DOI:10.17951/lsmll.2019.43.3.155-166]
32. Kremmel, B., & Schmitt, N. (2016). Interpreting vocabulary test scores: What do various item formats tell us about learners' ability to employ words? Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(4), 377-392. [DOI:10.1080/15434303.2016.1237516]
33. Kweon, S., & Kim, H. (2008). Beyond raw frequency: Incidental vocabulary acquisition in extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 191-215.
34. Little, J. L., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Angello, G. (2012). Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: Fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1337-1344. doi:10.1177/0956797612443370 [DOI:10.1177/0956797612443370]
35. Liu, O. L., Lee, H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). An investigation of explanation multiple-choice items in science assessment. Educational Assessment, 16(3), 164-184. doi:10.1080/10627197.2011.611702 [DOI:10.1080/10627197.2011.611702]
36. Madrigal-Hopes, D. L., Villavicencio, E., Foote, M. M., & Green, C. (2014). Transforming English language learners' work readiness: Case studies in explicit, work-specific vocabulary instruction. Adult Learning, 25(2), 47-56. [DOI:10.1177/1045159514522432]
37. Mahmoud, A. (2005). Collocation errors made by Arab learners of English. Asian EFL Journal, 5(2), 117-126. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/monthly-editions-new/collocation-errors-made-by-arab-learners-of-english/
38. Masoumi, G. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2020). Impact of test format on vocabulary test performance of EFL learners: the role of gender. Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 1-13. [DOI:10.1186/s40468-020-00099-x]
39. McCarthy, M., O'Keeffe, A., & Walsh, S. (2010). Vocabulary matrix: Understanding, learning, teaching. Hampshire: Heinle, CENGAGE Learning.
40. Millar, N. (2005). The processing demands on non-native-like learner collocations on native speakers. Manuscript. Lancaster University.
41. Mirzaii, M. (2012). Implicit vs. explicit vocabulary learning: which approach serves long-term recall better? 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(2), 1-12. https://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/view/930
42. Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.
43. Pachai, M. V., DiBattista, D., & Kim, J. A. (2015). A systematic assessment of 'none of the above' on multiple choice tests in a first year psychology classroom. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 29-41. doi: [DOI:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.3.2]
44. Pulido, M. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2020). Desirable difficulties while learning collocations in a second language: Conditions that induce L1 interference improve learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 652-667. [DOI:10.1017/S1366728919000622]
45. Rahimi, A. (2005). The role of systematic exposure to lexical collocations in learning English vocabulary by Iranian students. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Shiraz Islamic Azad University.
46. Rashidi, N., & Piran, M. (2011). The effect of extensive and intensive reading on Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary size and depth. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 471-482. doi:10.4304/jltr.2.2.471-482 [DOI:10.4304/jltr.2.2.471-482]
47. Read, J. (2012). Assessing vocabulary. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O'Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 257-264). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
48. Reardon, S. F., Kalogrides, D., Fahle, E. M., Podolsky, A., & Zárate, R. C. (2018). The relationship between test item format and gender achievement gaps on math and ELA tests in fourth and eighth grades. Educational Researcher, 47(5), 284-294. [DOI:10.3102/0013189X18762105]
49. Riahi, I. (2018). Techniques in teaching and testing vocabulary for learners of English in an EFL context. In S. Hidri (Ed.), Revisiting the assessment of second language abilities: From theory to practice (pp. 289-310). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-62884-4_14]
50. Richard, C. J., & Renandya, A. W. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. USA: [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511667190]
51. Cambridge University Press.
52. Salido, M. G., Garcia, M., Villayandre-Llamazares, M., & Ramos, M. A. (2018). A lexical tool for academic writing in Spanish based on expert and novice corpora. Paper presented to the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC).
53. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. [DOI:10.1177/1362168808089921]
54. Shaibah, H., & van der Vleuten, C. (2013). The validity of multiple choice practical examinations as an alternative to traditional free response examination formats in gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6(3), 149-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.1325 [DOI:10.1002/ase.1325]
55. Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N. (2008). L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 429-458. doi:10.3138/cmlr.64.3.429 [DOI:10.3138/cmlr.64.3.429]
56. Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63(1), 121-159. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00730.x]
57. Taiwo, R. (2004). Helping ESL learners to minimize collocational errors. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(4), 176-189. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Taiwo-Collocation.html
58. Talebzadeh, Z., & Bagheri, M. S. (2012). Effects of sentence making, composition writing and cloze test assignments on vocabulary learning of pre-intermediate EFL students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 257-268. doi:10.5539/ijel.v2n1p257 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p257 [DOI:10.5539/ijel.v2n1p257]
59. Taylor, C. S., & Lee, Y. (2012). Gender DIF in reading and mathematics tests with mixed item formats. Applied Measurement in Education, 25(3), 246-280. [DOI:10.1080/08957347.2012.687650]
60. Toksöz, İ., & Kılıçkaya, F. (2017). Review of journal articles on washback in language testing in Turkey (2010-2017). Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 41(2), 184-204. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2017.41.2.184 [DOI:10.17951/lsmll.2017.41.2.184]
61. Tuyen, L. V. (2015). An investigation into the effectiveness of learning assessment for non-English major students at the tertiary level. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(5), 14-31. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijsell/v3-i5/3.pdf
62. Vosoughi1, H., & Mehdipour, Z. (2013). Effects of recognition task and production task on incidental vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(2), 356-363.
63. Walsh, M. (2005). Collocation and the learner of English. http://www.walshsensei.org/CollocationWalsh.pdf
64. Wang, Q. (2011). Lexical inferencing strategies for dealing with unknown words in reading- a contrastive study between Filipino Graduate Students and Chinese Graduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 302-313. doi:10.4304/jltr.2.2.302-313 [DOI:10.4304/jltr.2.2.302-313]
65. Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 55-77. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00227.x [DOI:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00227.x]
66. Xiao, R. Z., & McEnery, A. M. (2006). Collocation, semantic prosody and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 103-129. [DOI:10.1093/applin/ami045]
67. Yali, G. (2010). L2 Vocabulary acquisition through reading-incidental learning and intentional learning. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 74-93. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/L2-Vocabulary-Acquisition-Through-Reading-Learning-Yali/7d4eeb50135378db3856b19389301ecd04bfeb20
68. Young-Davy, B. (2014). Explicit vocabulary instruction. ORTESOL Journal, 31, 26-32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152527
69. Zarei, A. A., & Baniesmaili, N. (2010). Learnability of various patterns of lexical collocations by Iranian upper-intermediate learners of English. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 147-169. http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-42-en.html
70. Zarei, A., & Koosha, M. (2003). Patterns of Iranian advanced learners' problems with English collocations: A focus on lexical collocations. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 137-169. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=4488
71. Zarei, A. A., & Tondaki, N. (2015). The effects of explicit and implicit instructional techniques on Iranian EFL learners' comprehension and production of lexical collocations. Academie Royale Des Sciences D Outre-Mer Bulletin Des Seances, 4(2), 122-131. http://www.ikiu.ac.ir/public-files/profiles/items/090ad_1432409560.pdf
72. Zhang, B. (2009). Do example sentences work in direct vocabulary learning? Issues in Educational Research, 19(2), 175-189. https://www.iier.org.au/iier19/zhang.html
73. Zinkgräf, M. (2008). V+ N miscollocations in the written production of university level students. Elia, 8(3), 91-116. https://bibliotecadelenguas.uncoma.edu.ar/items/show/137

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb