Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2021)                   IJREE 2021, 6(4): 57-74 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shirban Sasi A, Lai J C M. Error Analysis of Taiwanese University Students’ English Essay Writing: A Longitudinal Corpus Study. IJREE. 2021; 6 (4)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-609-en.html
Department of Foreign Languages (DFL), National Chiayi University, Taiwan
Abstract:   (760 Views)
Writing is considered one of the most difficult skills in EFL/ESL. Thus, meticulous recognition and classification of students’ errors in certain contexts is a worthwhile endeavor which provides us with both diagnostic and prognostic power. Accordingly, a total of 430 students in 15 English writing classes held during 12 consecutive semesters in a private university in central Taiwan were the subjects of this study. They composed 5703 essays which were rated and coded by the authors. Adopting and modifying the error taxonomy proposed by Zheng & Park (2013), the authors classified a sum of 63460 errors into four main groups with their subsequent subcategories. This study revealed that the highest problematic areas for Taiwanese university students were ‘misformation’ with 51.55% of the whole including errors in tenses, parts of speech, prepositions, subject/verb agreements, and run-on sentences. Then, ‘omission’ errors ranked second with 21.30% including errors in articles, plural suffix-s, and relative pronouns. Finally, the third and fourth error types were ‘others’ with 15.13% including spelling, capitalization, and wrong vocabulary, and ‘addition’ with 12.01% containing errors in articles, unnecessary words, and conjunctions. This study provides numerous genuine samples from the students’ compositions being annotated based on the applied error taxonomy. Thus, the data presented in this study can provide researchers with a practical framework for future studies in error analysis, as well as pedagogical implications in the field.
Full-Text [PDF 789 kb]   (411 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Instructional effects on critical thinking: Performance on ill-defined issues. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 322-334. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.010]
2. Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London/ New York: Continuum. [DOI:10.5040/9781350933996]
3. Bao, X. (2015). Analysis on lexical errors in college English writing. Canadian Social Science, 11(12), 127-130. doi:10.3968/7775
4. Brown, D. (1994). Principles of language learning & teaching. Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
5. Chan, A. Y. W. (2010). Toward a taxonomy of written errors: Investigation into the written errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 295-319. doi: 10.2307/27896726 [DOI:10.5054/tq.2010.219941]
6. Chen, L. L. (2006). The effect of L1 and CAI on grammar learning: An error analysis of Taiwanese beginning EFL learners' English essays. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 1-19.
7. Chen, Y. M. (2002). The problems of university EFL writing in Taiwan. The Korea TESOL Journal, 5(1), 59-79. https://koreatesol.org/content/korea-tesol-journal-5
8. Chuang, F.Y., & Nesi, H. (2006). An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of L2 English produced by Chinese students. Corpora, 1(2), 251-271. doi:10.3366/cor.2006.1.2.251 [DOI:10.3366/cor.2006.1.2.251]
9. Conrad, S. (2000). Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 548-560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587743 [DOI:10.2307/3587743 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3587743]
10. Conrad, S. M. (1999). The importance of corpus-based research for language teachers. System 27(1), 1-18. [DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00046-3]
11. Corder, S. P. (1974). The significance of learner's errors. In Richards, JC (Ed) Error analysis (pp. 19-27). Singapore: Longman.
12. Darus, S., & Khor, H. C. (2009). Common errors in written English essays of form one Chinese students: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 242-253. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235772389_Common_errors_in_written_English_essays_of_form_one_Chinese_students_A_case_study
13. Darus, S., & Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483-495. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235772401_Error_analysis_of_the_written_english_essays_of_secondary_school_students_in_Malaysia_A_case_study
14. Divsar, H., & Heydari, R. (2017). A corpus-based study of EFL learners' errors in IELTS essay writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(3), 143-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.143 [DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.143]
15. Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Edrogan, V. (2005). Contribution of error analysis to foreign language teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faulty of Education, 1(2), 261- 270. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/161018
17. Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Fang, X., & Jiang X. M. (2007). Error analysis and the EFL classroom teaching. US-China Education Revie, 4(9), 10-14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502653.pdf
20. Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? Argumentation? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.001]
21. Granger, S. (2003). Error-tagged learner corpora and CALL: A promising synergy. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 465-480. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24157525
22. Halpern, D. F., & Sanders, B. R. (2004). Teaching critical thinking skills across the curriculum. [Participant Packet: December 1, 2004; 1:30 - 3:0 PM CT: STARLINK.]
23. Han, N. R., & Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2006). Detecting errors in English article usage by non-native speakers. Natural Language Engineering, 12(2), 115-129. doi:10.1017/S1351324906004190 [DOI:10.1017/S1351324906004190]
24. Hart, S. (2017). English exposed: Common mistakes by Chinese speakers. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong. [DOI:10.5790/hongkong/9789888390755.001.0001]
25. Hou, H. I. (2016). Learner corpus and academic writing: Identifying the error patterns of Taiwanese EFL students. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 4(1), 19-30. doi: 10.5296/jsel.v4i1.9193 [DOI:10.5296/jsel.v4i1.9193]
26. Jiang, M. C. (1995). An analysis of Chinese learners' errors in prepositions. Journal of National Chiayi Institute of Agriculture, 41, 187-201.
27. Keshavarz, M. H. (2008). Contrastive analysis and error analysis. Tahran: Rahnama Press.
28. Kim, M. S. (2009). An error analysis of a learner corpus of written and spoken English produced by Korean university students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea University, South Korea.
29. Kotsyuk, M. L. (2015). English language error analysis of the written texts produced by Ukraine learners: Data collection. Cognitive Studies, 15, 389-395. [DOI:10.11649/cs.2015.027]
30. Lan, G., & Lucas, K., & Sun, Y. (2019). Does L2 writing proficiency influence noun phrase complexity? A case analysis of argumentative essays written by Chinese students in a first-year composition course. System 85, 1-13. doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102116 [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2019.102116]
31. Leki, I. (1992). Understanding ESL writers: A guide for teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
32. Mitchell, R., & Myles, M. (2004). Second language learning theories. New York: Hodder Arnold.
33. Mohamed, A. R., & Goh, L., & Wan, R. E. (2004). English errors and Chinese learners. Sunway College Journal, 1, 83-97.
34. Myles, F. (2005). Interlanguage corpora and SLA research. Second Language Research, 21(4), 373-391. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43103691 [DOI:10.1191/0267658305sr252oa]
35. Nakagawa, T. (2011). Education and training of creative problem-solving thinking with TRIZ/USIT. Procedia Engineering, 9, 582-595. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.144 [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.144]
36. Pimpisa, R. N. P., & Normah, O. (2015). Understanding EFL students' errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 99-106. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083531.pdf
37. Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 204-207. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002]
38. Pravec, N. (2002). Survey of learner corpora. ICAME Journal, 26, 81-114. http://korpus.uib.no/icame/ij26/pravec.pdf
39. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). GB: Pearson Education Limited.
40. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of teaching and applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
41. Richards, J. C. (1992). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.
42. Ro¨mer, U. (2011). Corpus research applications in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 205-225. doi: [DOI:10.1017/S0267190511000055]
43. Selinker, L. (1972). INTERLANGUAGE. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10 (3), 209-231. [DOI:10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209]
44. Sinclair, J. (2004). How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [DOI:10.1075/scl.12]
45. Zhan, H. (2015). Frequent errors in Chinese EFL learners' topic-based writings. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 72-81. doi:10.5539/elt.v8n5p72 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p72 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v8n5p72]
46. Zheng, C., & Park, T. J. (2013). An analysis of errors in English writing made by Chinese and Korean university students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1342-1351. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.8.1342-1351 [DOI:10.4304/tpls.3.8.1342-1351]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb