Investigating the Impact of Autonomy-Supportive English Language Instruction on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Motivation in Learning General English

Babaei, Mohammad; Pourhosein Gilakjani, Abbas

Volume 10, Issue 4 (12-2025) IJREE 2025, 10(4): 124-144 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Babaei M, Pourhosein Gilakjani A. (2025). Investigating the Impact of Autonomy-Supportive English Language Instruction on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Motivation in Learning General English. IJREE. 10(4),
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-1060-en.html

Investigating the Impact of Autonomy-Supportive English Language Instruction on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Motivation in Learning General English

Mohammad Babaei

, Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani ^*

Department of English Language Translation, La. C., Islamic Azad University, Lahijan,

Abstract: (48 Views)

Objective: The research investigated how implementing autonomy-supportive strategies in English language classrooms contributes to increased student motivation.
Methods: Participants in this study comprised 100 male EFL learners recruited from an English language institute located in Guilan, Iran. Sixty intermediate language learners were selected using the Oxford Quick Placement Test and subsequently randomly divided into two groups of 30 for the research. A motivation pretest was administered to both cohorts preceding the intervention. The treatment then commenced: the experimental group received autonomy-supportive English language instruction, and the control group followed the CLT approach. A motivation posttest was administered to all participants at the conclusion of the treatment to assess potential differences in motivation levels across the experimental (autonomy-supportive) and control (CLT) groups.
Results: The findings, statistically examined with independent and paired samples t-tests, demonstrated that autonomy-supportive teaching methods effectively boosted English learning motivation in the Iranian student cohort.
Conclusion: The results offer tangible proof that autonomy-supportive methods effectively cultivate more motivating language learning settings and enhance students' inherent motivation to pursue English language acquisition.

Keywords: Autonomy-supportive learning, general English, language instruction, motivation

Full-Text [PDF 674 kb] (19 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References

1. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 497-521. 10.1037/edu0000293 [DOI:10.1037/edu0000293]

2. Alamer, A. (2021). Basic psychological needs, motivational orientations, effort, and vocabulary knowledge: a comprehensive model. Stud. Second. Lang. Acquis, 44(1), 164-184. doi: 10.1017/S027226312100005X [DOI:10.1017/S027226312100005X]

3. Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students" need for autonomy. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly., & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). New York: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_20]

4. Bajrami, L. (2015). Teacher's new role in language learning and in promoting learner autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 423-427. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.528 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.528]

5. Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci E. L. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 258-267. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/2014_BenitaRothDeci1.pdf [DOI:10.1037/a0034007]

6. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow. England: Pearson Education.

7. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.): White Plains, MY: Pearson Longman.

8. Cheng, H. F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-174. [DOI:10.2167/illt048.0]

9. Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2023). Autonomy-supportive teaching enhances prosocial and reduces antisocial behavior via classroom climate and psychological needs: A multilevel randomized control intervention. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 1-15. [DOI:10.1123/jsep.2021-0337]

10. Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y. (2016). A teacher-focused intervention to decrease PE students' amotivation by increasing need satisfaction and decreasing need frustration. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol, 38(3), 217-235. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0236 [DOI:10.1123/jsep.2015-0236]

11. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. Deci, & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

12. Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Self-determined engagement in language learning: The relations among autonomy-support, psychological needs, and engagement. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1130-1147. doi: 10.30703/cije.586482

13. Dincer A., Yeşilyurt S., Noels K. A., & Vargas Lascano D. I. (2019a). Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. Sage Open, 9(2): 215824401985391 doi: 10.1177/2158244019853913 [DOI:10.1177/2158244019853913]

14. Dornyei, Z. (2002). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15. Duchatelet, D., & Donche, V. (2019). Fostering self-efficacy and self-regulation in higher education: A matter of autonomy support or academic motivation? Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 733-747. 10.1080/07294360.2019.1581143 [DOI:10.1080/07294360.2019.1581143]

16. Eakman, A. M., Kinney, A. R., Schierl, M. L., & Henry, K. L. (2019). Academic performance in student service members/veterans: Effects of instructor autonomy support, academic self-efficacy and academic problems. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1005-1026. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2019.1605048]

17. Gagne, M. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15(4), 372-390. 10.1080/714044203 [DOI:10.1080/714044203]

18. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. doi: 10.1002/job.322 [DOI:10.1002/job.322]

19. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143-154. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143 [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143]

20. Hajimaghsoodi, A., Saghaieh Bolghari, M. (2019). From collective activity to autonomous learning: Fostering learner autonomy in light of activity theory. IJREE, 4(4), 40-54. doi:10.29252/ijree.4.4.40 [DOI:10.29252/ijree.4.4.40]

21. Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001]

22. Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002]

23. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600. [DOI:10.1037/a0019682]

24. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students' preferred ways. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 686-701. [DOI:10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522]

25. Ikonen, A. (2013). Promotion of learner autonomy in the EFL classroom: The students' view. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstreams/4a822658-5a34-4afd-9a21-721df97b169a/download

26. Inngam, P., & Eamoraphan, S. (2014). A comparison of students' motivation for learning English as a foreign language in selected public and private schools in Bangkok. Scholar, 6(1), 15-19.

27. Karbakhsh Ravari, A., Nakhaee Ravari, S., & Rabani, K. (2025). Enhancing EFL learning through concordancing: A quasi-experimental study on EFL learners' collocational competence and retention, motivation, and autonomy. IJREE, 10(4), 54-80. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-1013-en.html

28. Kaur, A., Hashim, R. A., & Noman, M. (2014). Teacher autonomy support: Does it hinder motivation among Thai students? Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11, 171-189. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137285.pdf [DOI:10.32890/mjli.11.2014.7670]

29. Kaur, A., Hashim, R. A., & Noman, M. (2015). Teacher autonomy support intervention as a classroom practice in a Thai school: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal for Multicultural Education, 9(1), 10-27. [DOI:10.1108/JME-07-2014-0033]

30. Kleinkorres, R., Stang-Rabrig, J., & McElvany, N. (2023). The longitudinal development of students' well- being in adolescence: The role of perceived teacher autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(2), 496-513. doi: 10.1111/jora.12821 [DOI:10.1111/jora.12821]

31. Kunst, L. E., Maas, J., Van Assen, M. A. L. M., Van der Heijden, W., & Bekker, M. H. J. (2019). Autonomy deficits as vulnerability for anxiety: evidence from two laboratory-based studies. Anxiety Stress Coping, 32, 244-258. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2019.1580697 [DOI:10.1080/10615806.2019.1580697]

32. Little, D. (2020). Language learner autonomy: Rethinking language teaching. Lang. Teach. 55(1), 64-73. doi: [DOI:10.1017/S0261444820000488]

33. Machi, T., & Nakaya, M. (2014). Reciprocal teaching intervention in elementary mathematics classrooms: Children's social goals, interactive processes, and academic achievement. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(4), 322-335. [DOI:10.5926/jjep.62.322]

34. Mammadov, S., & Hertzog, N. B. (2021). Continuity and change of achievement goals in advanced learning context. Learning and Individual Differences, 92, 102086. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102086]

35. Murase, F. (2015). Measuring language learner autonomy: Problems and possibilities. In: Everhard, C.J., Murphy, L. (eds) Assessment and autonomy in language learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. [DOI:10.1057/9781137414380_3]

36. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theor. Res. Educ. 7, 133-144. doi: 10.1177/1477878509104318 [DOI:10.1177/1477878509104318]

37. Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clement, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(S1), 57-85. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00111 [DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00111]

38. Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 26-32. 10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5 [DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5]

39. Parrisius, C., Gaspard, H., Zitzmann, S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2022). The situative nature of competence and value beliefs and the predictive power of autonomy support: A multilevel investigation of repeated observations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 791-814. 10.1037/edu0000680 [DOI:10.1037/edu0000680]

40. Patall, E. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Trimble, S. S., Pituch, K. A., & Freeman, J. L. (2018). Daily autonomy supporting or thwarting and students' motivation and engagement in the high school science classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 269-288. [DOI:10.1037/edu0000214]

41. Pham, T. (2021). Employing project work to enhance aspects of learner autonomy for tertiary EFL learners. IJARIIT, 7, 386-395.

42. Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educ. Psychol. 44, 159-175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990 [DOI:10.1080/00461520903028990]

43. Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In book: Building Autonomous Learners, 129-152. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7 [DOI:10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7]

44. Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H., (2021) Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54-77. [DOI:10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657]

45. Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. R. (2019). A teacher-focused intervention to enhance students' classroom engagement. In Handbook of student engagement interventions (pp. 87-102). Academic Press. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00007-3]

46. Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Yu, T. H. (2020). An autonomy-supportive intervention to develop students' resilience by boosting agentic engagement. Int. J. Behav. Develop. 44(4), 325-338. [DOI:10.1177/0165025420911103]

47. Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. Mclnerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 31-60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.

48. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147-169. [DOI:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f]

49. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications. [DOI:10.1521/978.14625/28806]

50. Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 550-558. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.550 [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.550]

51. Sayadi, M., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2018). The impact of using podcasts on Iranian autonomous /non-autonomous EFL learners' listening comprehension ability at pre-intermediate level. IJREE, 3(3), 72-82. doi:10.29252/ijree.3.3.72 [DOI:10.29252/ijree.3.3.72]

52. Shafaei A. (2023). Exploring the relationship between Iranian English language teachers' sense of autonomy and perfectionism. IJREE, 8(3), 82-93. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-808-en.html

53. Singhnarang, P., & Gajaseni, C. (2018). Effects of teacher's motivating styles on learner autonomy of English as a foreign language elementary students. An Online Journal of Education, 13(4), 257-269. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/OJED/article/view/204722

54. Singh Negi, J., & Laudari, S. (2022). Challenges of developing learner autonomy of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in underprivileged areas. IJREE, 7(2), 65-80. doi:10.52547/ijree.7.2.65 [DOI:10.52547/ijree.7.2.65]

55. Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educ. Psychol. 39, 97-110. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 [DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2]

56. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645. 10.1080/01443410500345172 [DOI:10.1080/01443410500345172]

57. Trigueros, R., Padilla, A., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Lirola, M. J., García-Luengo, A. V., Rocamora-Pérez, P., & López-Liria, R. (2020). The influence of teachers on motivation and academic stress and their effect on the learning strategies of university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 9089. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17239089]

58. Tsai, Y. M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 460-472. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460]

59. Wang, Y. L., & Guan, H. F. (2020). Exploring demotivation factors of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language based on positive psychology. Rev. Argent. Clin. Psicol. 29, 851-861. doi: 10.24205/03276716.2020.116 [DOI:10.24205/03276716.2020.116]

60. Zhang, D., Skilling, K. G., & Bobis, J. (2016). Autonomy supportive teaching practices: International perspectives. In 4th International Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in Education Conference (STEM 2016), Beijing Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.