Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2020)                   IJREE 2020, 5(1): 53-69 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rashtchi M, Porkar R, Ghazi MirSaeed S. Jigsaw and Dictogloss Tasks: Do They Facilitate the Development of Speech Acts?. IJREE 2020; 5 (1)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-269-en.html
TEFL Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (4842 Views)
Speech acts have a decisive role in enabling EFL learners to communicate successfully. This study compared the efficacy of jigsaw and dictogloss tasks in learning speech act by 47 pre-intermediate adolescent EFL learners. The participants were selected based on convenience sampling and were homogenized based on the results of a PET. Discourse- completion task (DCT) was employed as the pre and post-tests. The result of the DCT pre-test showed that the participants were not familiar with the target speech acts. Twenty 3-minute vignettes taken from different films were employed as the medium of instruction. After the treatment, the participants sat for another DCT. The results revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding knowledge of speech acts. However, the results of the paired samples t-test conducted to ensure the effectiveness of the treatment showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the groups’ DCT pre and post-tests. The study revealed that task type did not have a crucial role in learning speech acts; however, it encouraged the use of films for teaching speech acts. 
Full-Text [PDF 507 kb]   (991 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

1. Abolfathiasl, H., & Abdullah, A. N. (2015). Pragmatic consciousness-raising activities and EFL learners' speech act performance of 'making suggestions.' Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 333-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0602.13 [DOI:10.17507/jltr.0602.13]
2. Abrams, Z. I. (2014). Using film to provide a context for teaching L2 pragmatics. System 46(1), 55-64. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.06.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2014.06.005]
3. Al Aamri, R. (2014). Teaching speech acts to EFL college-level Omani learners: Requests and refusals (Unpublished master's thesis). The University of Wisconsin-River Falls, Wisconsin, USA. Retrieved September 2, 2019, from https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/70953/RahmaAlAamri.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
4. Ambroise, B. (2010). Speech act theory to pragmatics: The loss of the illocutionary point. Retrieved June 25, 2019, from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00514810
5. Arundale, R. B. (2004). Pragmatics, conversational implicative, and conversation. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.). Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 41-63). London: Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781410611574.ch3
6. Bach, K. (2006). Speech acts and pragmatics, In M. Devitt & R. Hanley (Eds.). The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language (pp. 147-167). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [DOI:10.1111/b.9780631231424.2006.00010.x]
7. Bataineh, R. F., & Bani Younis, R. A. (2016). The effect of dictogloss on Jordanian EFL teachers' instructional practices and students' writing performance. International Journal of Education and Training, 2(1), 1-11. http://www.injet.upm.edu.my/images/journal/isujun2016/The%20Effect%20of%20Dictogloss%20on%20Jordanian%20EFL%20Teachers-%20Instructional%20Practices%20and%20Students%27%20Writing%20Performance.pdf
8. Bara, B. G. (2010). Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262014113.001.0001]
9. Bialystok, E. (1993). Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. Birjandi, P., & Derakhshan, A. (2013). Pragmatic comprehension of apology, request and refusal: An investigation on the effect of consciousness-raising video-driven prompts. Applied Research on English Language, 3(1), 67-86. http://doi.org/10.22108/are.2014.15479
11. Borer, B. (2018). Teaching and learning pragmatics and speech acts: An instructional pragmatics curriculum development project for EFL learners. School of Education Student Capstone Projects, 176. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_cp/176
12. Boxer, D. (2002). Applying sociolinguistics: Domains and face-to-face interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [DOI:10.1075/impact.15]
13. Ebadi, S., & Seidi, N. (2015). Iranian EFL learners' request strategies preferences across proficiency levels and gender. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(4), 65-73. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/63/pdf_60
14. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 209-224. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ803869 [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006]
16. Faghani, B., Derakhshan, A., & Zangoei, A. (2015). A review on the effect of using dictogloss tasks and fake scoring on children's dictation ability. English Linguistics Research, 4(3), 58-71. http://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v4n3p58 [DOI:10.5430/elr.v4n3p58]
17. Fleck, R. (Director). (2006). Half Nelson [Motion Picture].
18. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97-118. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004144 [DOI:10.1017/S0261444807004144]
19. Goldthwait, B. (Director). (2009). World's Greatest Dad [Motion Picture].
20. Grant, L., Starks, D. (2001). Screening appropriate teaching materials. Closings from textbooks and television soap operas. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 39-50. http://doi.org/10.1515/iral.39.1.39 [DOI:10.1515/iral.39.1.39]
21. Hassall, T. (2003). Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1903-1928. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00115-2 [DOI:10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00115-2]
22. Holtgraves, T. (2007). Second language learners and speech act comprehension. Language Learning, 57(4), 595-610. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00429.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00429.x]
23. Ishihara, N. (2007). Web-based curriculum for pragmatic instruction in Japanese as a foreign language: An explicit awareness-raising approach. Language Awareness, 16(1), 21-40. doi: 10.2167/la398.0 [DOI:10.2167/la398.0]
24. Ishihara, N. (2004). Exploring the immediate and delayed effects of formal instruction: Teaching giving and responding to compliments. Minnesota TESOL/WITESOL Journal, 21, 37-71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285004243_Exploring_the_immediate_and_delayed_effects_of_formal_instruction_Teaching_giving_and_responding_to_compliments
25. Ishihara, N. (2014). Incorporating technology into pragmatics focused instruction. In N. Ishihara & A.D. Cohen (Eds.). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 244-263). London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315833842]
26. Jacobs, G., & Small, J. (2003). Combing dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning. The Reading Matrix, 3(1), 1-15. http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/jacobs_small/article.pdf
27. Jafariyan Shahri, M., Matlabi, M., Esmaeili, R., & Kianmehr, M. (2017). Effectiveness of teaching: Jigsaw technique vs. lecture for medical students' Physics course. Bali Medical Journal (Bali Med J), 6(3), 529-533. doi: 10.15562/bmj.v6i3.400 [DOI:10.15562/bmj.v6i3.400]
28. Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 502-530. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.502 [DOI:10.1093/applin/22.4.502]
29. Kasper, G., & Roever, C. (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 341-358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Khemlani David, M. (2016). Using movies to teach the speech act of refusals. Retrieved June 28, 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305309139_Using_Movies_to_teach_the_Speech_Act_of_Refusals
31. Kilic, D. (2008). The effect of the jigsaw technique on learning the concepts of the principles and methods of teaching. World Applied Sciences Journal, 4(1), 109-114. Retrieved https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281315386
32. Konakahara, M. (2011). Requests in Japanese learners' English in comparison with British English and Japanese. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277102103_Requests_in_Japanese_learners'_English_in_comparison_with_British_English_and_Japanese
33. Kondo, S. (2008). Effects on pragmatic development through awareness-raising instruction: Refusals by Japanese EFL learners. In E. Alcon Soler & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.). Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (153-177). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [DOI:10.21832/9781847690869-010]
34. Latif, H. (2014). The place of pragmatics in the EFL classroom: Implications for teacher training. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Professional Development and Reflective Teaching. Meknes: Moulay Ismail University.
35. Lee, C. (2018). Researching and teaching second language speech acts in the Chinese context. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-8980-0_5]
36. Lestik, M., & Plous, S. (2012). Jigsaw classroom. Retrieved October 24, 2012. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigsaw_(teaching_technique)
37. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [DOI:10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3]
38. Marashi, H., & Khaksar, M. (2013). Dictogloss or dicto-phrase: Which works better for listening comprehension? i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(1), 22-29. doi: 10.26634/jelt.3.1.2147 [DOI:10.26634/jelt.3.1.2147]
39. Martinez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y. J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners' production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33(3), 463-480. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007 [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007]
40. Meng, J. (2010). Jigsaw cooperative learning in English reading. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 501-504. http://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.4.501-504 [DOI:10.4304/jltr.1.4.501-504]
41. Mengduo, Q., & Xiaoling, J. (2010). Jigsaw strategy as a cooperative learning technique: Focusing on the language learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 113-125. Retrieved March 25, 2019, from www.celea.org.cn › teic
42. Milleret, M. (2006). Teaching speech acts. American Portuguese Studies Association Fifth International Conference. Minneapolis, Minnesota. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from www.ncolctl.org › files › Teaching-speech-act
43. Moon, S., & Park, C. (2007). Media effects on acculturation and biculturalism: A case study of Korean immigrants in Los Angeles' Korea town. Mass Communication and Society, 10(3), 319-343. http://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701407330 [DOI:10.1080/15205430701407330]
44. Murad, H. M. (2017). The effectiveness of using dictogloss strategy on developing tenth graders' English grammar learning and writing skills in Gaza. https://iugspace.iugaza.edu.ps/handle/20.500.12358/20924?locale-attribute=en
45. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York, NY: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203850961]
46. Nguyen, H. (2017). Does dictogloss improve non-English major students' motivation and grammatical competence? Language Education in Asia, 8(1), 84-108. http://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/17/V8/I1/A06/Nguyen [DOI:10.5746/LEiA/17/V8/I1/A06/Nguyen]
47. Nguyen, T., Pham, T. H., & Pham, M. H. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 416-434. [DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003]
48. Payne, A. (Director). (2011). The Descendants [Motion Picture].
49. Qin, J. (2008). The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 61-82. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807084494 [DOI:10.1177/1362168807084494]
50. Rashtchi, M., & Jalili, S. (2011). Consciousness-raising versus explicit grammar teaching and their impact on Iranian EFL learners' lexical inferencing. TELL, 5(1), 45-71. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=599757 [DOI:10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.4.4]
51. Rashtchi, M., & Keyvanfar, A. (2007). ELT Quick 'n' Easy. Tehran: Rahnama.
52. Rashtchi, M., & Khosroabadi, P. (2009). The effect of explicit focus on form and dictogloss tasks on learning English tenses. Journal of Language Studies, 1(1), 101-114.
53. Redford, R. (Director). (1998). The Horse Whisperer [Motion Picture].
54. Reece, D., & Palmgreen, P. (2000). Coming to America: Need for acculturation and media use motives among Indian sojourners in the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(6), 807-824. [DOI:10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00033-X]
55. Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524797]
56. Schauer, G. A. (2006). Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning, 56(2), 269-318. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x [DOI:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x]
57. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning1. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. [DOI:10.1093/applin/11.2.129]
58. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003]
59. Searle G. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23. Retrieved January 25, 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166848 [DOI:10.1017/S0047404500006837]
60. Shively, R. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1818-1835. [DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.030]
61. Sitohang, I., & Purnawarman, P. (2015). The effectiveness of jigsaw strategy to improve students' skill in writing a recount text. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(2), 183-189.
62. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Heinkel (Ed). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251-274. [DOI:10.1177/136216880000400304]
64. Sykes, J. M. (2008). A dynamic approach to social interaction: Synthetic immersive environments & Spanish pragmatics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Minnesota. Retrieved March 23, 2019, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304582040
65. Taguchi, N. (2006). Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics, 16(4), 513-533. http://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16.4.05tag [DOI:10.1075/prag.16.4.05tag]
66. Taguchi, N. (2008). Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study-abroad context. Language Learning, 58(1), 33-71. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.x]
67. Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524797.014]
68. Truscott, J., & Sharwood Smith, M. (2011). Input, intake, and consciousness. The quest for a theoretical foundation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 497-528. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44486032 [DOI:10.1017/S0272263111000295]
69. Van Compernolle, R. A., & William, L. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 39-60. [DOI:10.1177/1362168811423340]
70. Vasiljevic, Z. (2010). Dictogloss as an interactive method of teaching listening comprehension to L2 Learners. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 41-52. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1081435.pdf [DOI:10.5539/elt.v3n1p41]
71. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Winke, P., & Teng, C. (2010). Using task-based pragmatics tutorials while studying abroad in China. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 363-399. http://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2010.016 [DOI:10.1515/iprg.2010.016]
73. Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 115-132. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01143.x]
74. Yi-xuan, F. (2016). Teaching speech acts in EFL classroom: An implicit pedagogy. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(7), 515-520. http://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2016.07.002 [DOI:10.17265/1539-8072/2016.07.002]
75. Yulian, T. (2012). The effectiveness of using jigsaw and sq3r technique in instruction toward the students' reading comprehension of narrative text at the eight grade of junior high school state 8 metro academic year 2011/2012. Premise Journal of English Education, 1(2), 152-163. http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/english/article/view/1119/794
76. Zahra, R. O. (2014). The use of jigsaw technique in improving students' ability in writing a descriptive text. Journal of English and Education, 2(1), 64-75. Retrieved March 10, 2018, from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/748/544
77. Zangoei, A., Nourmohammadi, E., & Derakhshan, A. (2014). The effect of consciousness-raising listening prompts on the development of the speech act of apology in an Iranian EFL context. Sage Open, 4(2), 1-10. [DOI:10.1177/2158244014531770]
78. Zeng, G. (2017). Collaborative dialogue in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face communication. ReCALL, 29(3), 257-275. https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1085119732?and_facet_journal=jour.1271517&and_facet_for=3468 [DOI:10.1017/S0958344017000118]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb