1. Arikan, A., & Bakla, A. (2011). Learner autonomy online: Stories from a blogging experience. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 240-251). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr
2. Barabadi, E., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2015). An activity theory analysis of ELT reform in Iranian public schools. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 127-166. doi:10.18869/acadpub.ijal.18.1.127 [
DOI:10.18869/acadpub.ijal.18.1.127]
3. Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy and its role in learning. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 734-745). NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_48 [
DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_48]
4. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315833767 [
DOI:10.4324/9781315833767]
5. Benson, P. (2011). What's new in autonomy? The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15-18. Retrieved from https://jalt-publications.org/files/pdf-article/plen3.pdf
6. Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16(2), 377-395. doi:10.1017/s0958344004000928 [
DOI:10.1017/S0958344004000928]
7. Burston, J. (1996). CALL at the crossroads: Myths, realities, promises and challenges. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 27-36. doi:10.1075/aral.19.2.02bur [
DOI:10.1075/aral.19.2.02bur]
8. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y (1993). A cultural approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York: CUP.
9. Collentine, K. (2011). Learner autonomy in a task-based 3D world and production. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 50-67. doi:10125/44262
10. Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54(2), 109-117. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31211652/ [
DOI:10.1093/elt/54.2.109]
11. Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 24, 1-23. Retrieved from https://asian-efl-journal.com/pta_Nov_07_dd.pdf
12. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. [
DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6]
13. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6
14. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf
15. Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a test bench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64-103). Cambridge: CUP. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625510.004 [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511625510.004]
16. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: CUP. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003 [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003]
17. Farrell, T.S. C., & Jacobs, G. (2010). Essentials for successful English language teaching. London: Continuum.
18. Farivar, A., & Rahimi, A. (2015). The Impact of CALL on Iranian EFL Learners' Autonomy. Procedia-Social & Behavioral Sciences, 192, 644-649. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.112 [
DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.112]
19. Felix, U. (2005). E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: The need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches. ReCALL, 17(1), 85-100. doi:10.1017/s0958344005000716 [
DOI:10.1017/S0958344005000716]
20. Feryok, A. (2013). Teaching for learner autonomy: The teacher's role and sociocultural theory. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 213-225. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2013.836203 [
DOI:10.1080/17501229.2013.836203]
21. Figura, K., & Jarvis, H. (2007). Computer-based materials: a study of learner autonomy and strategies. System, 35(4), 448-468. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.07.001 [
DOI:10.1016/j.system.2007.07.001]
22. Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68-86. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/52231/
23. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
24. Hu, P., & Zhang, j. (2017). A pathway to learner autonomy: A self-determination theory perspective. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 18,147-157. doi:10.1007/s12564-016-9468-z [
DOI:10.1007/s12564-016-9468-z]
25. Jarvis, H. (2012). Computers and learner autonomy: Trends and issues. London: British Council.
26. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B. A., & Macaulay, C. (1999). The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context. Interactions, 6(4), 27-39. doi:10.1145/306412.306431 [
DOI:10.1145/306412.306431]
27. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33(2), 79-96. doi: 10.1017/S0261444800015329 [
DOI:10.1017/S0261444800015329]
28. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: OUP.
29. Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217-236. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.04.001 [
DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.04.001]
30. Little, D. (2008). Knowledge about language and learner autonomy. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed.) (pp. 247-258). NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3-153
31. Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435. doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(96)00039-5 [
DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00039-5]
32. Meri, S. (2012). Autonomous computer-assisted language learning: Turkish primary school students' perceptions of Dyned software. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED595306.pdf
33. Milton, J. (1997). Providing computerized self-access opportunities for the development of writing skills. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 237-263), London: Longman. doi:10.1017/s0272263198273062 [
DOI:10.1017/S0272263198273062]
34. Mosvold, R., & Bjuland, R. (2011). An activity theory view on learning studies. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(3), 261-275. doi:10.1007/s13158-011-0048-4 [
DOI:10.1007/s13158-011-0048-4]
35. Nazari, M., Farnia, M., Ghonsooly, B., &, Jafarigohar, M. (2019). Contradictions in writing anxiety: A qualitative case study of expansive learning among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Translation, 9(1), 33-49. Retrieved from http://ttlt.azad.ac.ir/article_666059.html
36. Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning-Parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 163-178. doi:10.1017/S0958344005000224 [
DOI:10.1017/S0958344005000224]
37. Nunan, D. (2003). Nine steps to learner autonomy. Retrieved from www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.84007.../menu/.../2003_11_Nunan_eng.pdf
38. Ohara, T. (2013, July). Conceptualization of learner autonomy: learner autonomy as the mediated capacity. Paper presented at the 18th Biennial Conference of the Japanese Studies Association of Australia, Australian National University, Australia.
39. Oshima, A., & Hogue, H. (2014). Longman Academic Writing Series 3: Paragraphs to Essays (4th Edition). Pearson Education ESL. https://www.amazon.com/Longman-Academic-Writing-Paragraphs-Essays/dp/0132915669
40. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524490]
41. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
42. Parks, S. (2000). Same task, different activities: Issues of investment identity, and use of strategy. TESL Canada Journal, 17(2), 21-28. doi:10.18806/tesl.v17i2.890 [
DOI:10.18806/tesl.v17i2.890]
43. Rahman, M. M. (2013). CALL in promoting EFL learner autonomy at the tertiary level in Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11948/881
44. Rahimi, A., & Askari Bigdeli, R. (2013). ICT and EFL students' self-regulation mastery: Educational meat or poison? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267272018_ICT_and_EFL_Students'_SelfRegulation_Mastery_Educational_Meat_or_Poison
45. Rahimi, A., Ebrahimi, N. A., & Eskandari, Z. (2013). The effects of using technology and the internet on some Iranian EFL students' perceptions of their communication classroom environment. Teaching English with Technology, 13(1), 3-19. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/54bf/39cdc4758383c66c47ebedc99dc2a95c924a.pdf
46. Schwienhorst, K. (2008). Learner autonomy and CALL environments. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203012208 [
DOI:10.4324/9780203012208]
47. Shetzer H., & Warschauer M. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to network based language learning. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 171-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524735.010 [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524735.010]
48. Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BILL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57-78. doi: 10.1017/S0958344007000511 [
DOI:10.1017/S0958344007000511]
49. Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL journal, 6(11). Retrieved from http://www.aitech.ac.jp/-iteslj/
50. Zhang, L. X., & Li, X. X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4, 15-23. Retrieved from http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-WYJY200404002.htm