Volume 3, Issue 3 (9-2018)                   IJREE 2018, 3(3): 1-12 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ng M C W. Assessment for/as Learning in Hong Kong English Language Classrooms: A Review. IJREE. 2018; 3 (3)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-104-en.html
Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
Abstract:   (945 Views)

Multiple conceptualizations of the interrelation between assessment and learning yield three notions of assessment: assessment of learning, assessment for learning, and assessment as learning. This paper aims at uncovering roles and obstacles of assessment for learning and assessment as learning in English language classrooms in Hong Kong. Grounded upon the theory of constructivism and the notion of learner autonomy, assessment for learning and assessment as learning play vital roles in supporting students’ learning and nurturing autonomous learners in English language classrooms in Hong Kong, respectively. In particular, assessment for learning provides students with achievement targets prior to assessments, communicates assessment results with students by means of descriptive feedback, and guides teachers’ future lesson planning whilst assessment as learning equips students with abilities to set personal learning goals, monitor their own learning process, and conduct self-assessment in the course of learning. For all their desirability and perceived pedagogical efficacy, seldom are these two assessment practices operationalized in the implemented curriculum in English language classrooms, where assessment of learning prevails; such actualities can largely be attributable to local teachers’ lack of motivation to modify their existing assessment practices out of their conservative conceptualization of assessments, low metacognitive awareness as well as level of English proficiency of local students, and large class sizes in local classrooms, which are construed as local contextual factors hindering implementation of the two assessment practices. The aforementioned obstacles ought to be overcome so that the two assessment practices can be promoted and implemented in local English classrooms in distinct year levels for the sake of students’ language learning.

 
 

Full-Text [PDF 824 kb]   (80 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Alderson, C. (n.d.). Test specifications. Retrieved from http://languagetesting.info/video/main.html
2. Alesandrini, K., & Larson, L. (2002). Teachers bridge to constructivism. The Clearing House, 75(3), 118-121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30189718 [DOI:10.1080/00098650209599249]
3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Language-Testing-Practice-Developing.../dp/0194371484 [PMCID]
4. Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequence. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/7988021
5. Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. www.sciepub.com/reference/73974 [DOI:10.5790/hongkong/9789622099579.001.0001]
6. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education Inc. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265532207086784
7. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/download/fedora.../4.-Wagner-2003.pdf [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511732959]
8. Cheng, Y. C. (2009). Hong Kong educational reforms in the last decade: reform syndrome and new developments. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(1), 65-86. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/09513540910926439 [DOI:10.1108/09513540910926439]
9. Choudhury, A. S. (2011). Classroom roles of English language teachers: The traditional and the innovative. Contemporary Online Language Education Journal, 1(1), 33-40. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/1026697/Classroom_roles_of_English_language_teachers_The_Traditional_and_the_innovative
10. Crain, W. (2000). Theories of development: concept and applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/5982872
11. Cruse, A. (2011). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. www.oupcanada.com/catalog/9780199559466.html
12. Cullen, R. (2008). Teaching grammar as a liberating force. ELT Journal, 62(3), 221-30. Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/62/3/221.full.pdf+html [DOI:10.1093/elt/ccm042]
13. Curriculum Development Council & Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (2007). English Language Curriculum and Assessment Guide (Secondary 4-6). Retrieved from
14. Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment for learning; assessment as learning: Changing practices means changing beliefs. In Education Bereau (Ed.), Assessment and learning (Issue 2, pp. 1-5). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Government Printer.
15. Education Commission (2000). Reform Proposals for the Education System in Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.e-c.edu.hk/eng/reform/annex/Edu-reform-eng.pdf
16. Evans, V., & Greens, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Cognitive-Linguistics-Introduction...Evans/dp/0805860142
17. Formkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2013). An Introduction to language (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Language-MindTap-Course.../1133310680
18. Fox, K. (2004). Watching the English: The hidden rules of English behaviour. London: Hodder & Stoughton. ilmk.khspu.ru/?wpfb_dl=171
19. Greenbaum, S., & Quirk, R. (1990). A student's grammar of the English language. Edinburgh Gate: Longman.
20. Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M. (2000). Sociology: Themes and perspectives (4th ed.). London: Collins. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/6447159
21. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com › Education › Testing & Measurement
22. Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics: A coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511841668]
23. Ke, C. (2006). A model of formative task-based language assessment for Chinese as a foreign language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(2), 207-27. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15434311laq0302_6 [DOI:10.1207/s15434311laq0302_6]
24. Lee, I. (2016). Putting students at the center of classroom L2 writing assessment. Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(2), 258-80. Retrieved from http://www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cmlr.2802 [DOI:10.3138/cmlr.2802]
25. Lee, J., & Ng, M. (2007). Planning for the world city. In Y. M. Yeung (Ed.), The first decade: The Hong Kong SAR in retrospective and introspective perspectives (pp. 297-320). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
26. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://elt.oup.com › ... › How Languages are Learned 4e
27. Lumoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1177/02655322080250020502]
28. Marsh, C. J. (2009). School-based curriculum development: idealized or actual? In C. J. Marsh (Ed.), Key concepts for understanding curriculum (pp. 137-50). London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203870457]
29. Mays, K. J. (Ed.). (2013). The Norton introduction to literature (Shorter 11th ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
30. McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. ELT Journal, 61(3), 228-36. Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/61/3/228.short [DOI:10.1093/elt/ccm030]
31. Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://www.amazon.com/Language-Learning-Theories...Mitchell/dp/1444163108
32. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139858656]
33. Nunan, D. (2008). Exploring genre and register in contemporary English. English Today, 24(2), 56-61. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=1891596&jid=ENG&volumeId=24&issueId=02&aid=1891592&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession [DOI:10.1017/S0266078408000217]
34. Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Essentials of educational psychology: Big ideas to guide effective teaching (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson. https://www.amazon.com/Essentials-Educational-Psychology-Effective.../0133830837
35. Poincare, H. (2001). The value of science: Essential writings of Henri Poincare. In H. C. E. Ng (Ed.), In dialogue with nature: Textbook for general education foundation program (2nd ed., pp. 161-78.). Hong Kong: Office of University General Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
36. Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133#.UqNETaOQ-1t
37. Schunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 207-231. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_2 [DOI:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133]
38. Smith, A. (1904). The wealth of nations. (E. Cannan, Ed.). In H. C. E. Ng (Ed.), In dialogue with humanity: Textbook for general education foundation program (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 185-213). Hong Kong: Office of University General Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
39. Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534-9. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ422814
40. Stiggins, R. J. (2008). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
41. Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2006). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right – using it well. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. [PMID]
42. Sze, P. M. (2006). Developing students' listening and speaking skills through ELT podcasts. Education Journal, 34(2), 115-34. Retrieved from http://hkier.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/journal/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ej_v34n2_115-134.pdf
43. Tuzi, F. (2013). Language assessment principles. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQWDJeaswhU
44. Weigie, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265532207077217 [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511732997]
45. Yule, G. (2014). The study of language (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Study-Language-George-Yule/dp/1107658179

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb