Reading for Information or Reading for Reflection? Text-based Nature of Thinking Skills: Lower Vs. Higher Order Thinking Skills

Saidi, Ezzeddine

Volume 10, Issue 3 (9-2025) IJREE 2025, 10(3): 69-81 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Saidi E. (2025). Reading for Information or Reading for Reflection? Text-based Nature of Thinking Skills: Lower Vs. Higher Order Thinking Skills. IJREE. 10(3),
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-1008-en.html

Reading for Information or Reading for Reflection? Text-based Nature of Thinking Skills: Lower Vs. Higher Order Thinking Skills

Ezzeddine Saidi ^*

University of Gabes, Tunisia

Abstract: (2007 Views)

This study explores the cognitive levels targeted by reading-comprehension activities in two textbooks of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) authored by the Tunisian Ministry of Education. It adopts Freeman’s (2014) Taxonomy of Reading-Comprehension Questions to provide a quantitative analysis of the ‘categories’ vs. ‘types’ of questions used in reading activities in the two textbooks, and the ‘lower’ vs. ‘higher’ order thinking skills they require. The Analysis unveiled a recurrent pattern in the two textbooks favoring (1) question categories focusing on content and language as opposed to affect, and (2) question types focusing on explicit information and language input as opposed to questions requiring inferences, personal responses, and evaluations of the claims and views presented to learners. The diagnosed pattern is useful in developing the learners’ linguistic repertoire, but it has limited impact on developing their critical views towards the ideas presented to them and enhancing their awareness about the cultural content embedded in the reading materials.

Keywords: reading comprehension, higher-order thinking, lower-order thinking, EFL textbooks, question taxonomy

Full-Text [PDF 603 kb] (321 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References

1. Abdushukurova, U. (2024). Teaching receptive skills: Reading and listening. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 5(5), 58-63.

2. Akbari, O., & Razavi, A. (2016). Using authentic materials in the foreign language classrooms: Teachers' perspectives in EFL classes. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(2), 105-116. [DOI:10.5861/ijrse.2015.1189]

3. Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34(4), 494-508. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.003]

4. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Complete Edition. New York: Longman.

5. Askari, N. (2023). Relationship between speed of reading and reading comprehension score in undergraduate students of EFLU: A Disquisition. IJREE, 8(4), 17-31. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-802-en.html

6. Bartu, H. (2001). Can't read without thinking? Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(2), 593-614. doi:10.64152/10125/66977 [DOI:10.64152/10125/66977]

7. Beerwinkle, A., & McKeown, D. (2021). An analysis of reading comprehension questions in Kenyan English Textbooks. Teck Know Learn, 26, 429-441. [DOI:10.1007/s10758-021-09502-9]

8. Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 60- 69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237413136_The_Use_of_Authentic_Materials_in_the_Teaching_of_Reading

9. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.

10. Booth, D. (2001). Reading and writing in the middle years. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse.

11. Brookhart, S. (2010) How to assess higher-order thinking in your classroom. ASCD, Alexandria.

12. Chamot, A. U. (2001). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning (pp. 25-43). Harlow, UK: Pearson. [DOI:10.4324/9781315838465]

13. Cotrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skill: developing effective analysis and argument. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

14. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). What reading does for the Mind? Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 137-149. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237109087_What_reading_does_for_the_mind

15. Day, R., & Park, J. S. (2005). Developing reading comprehension questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 60-72. doi:10.64152/10125/66599 [DOI:10.64152/10125/66599]

16. Endris, A. A. (2018). Effects of extensive reading on EFL learners' reading comprehension and attitudes. IJREE, 3(4), 1-11. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-113-en.html [DOI:10.29252/ijree.3.4.1]

17. Erten, I. H., & Razi, S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 60-77. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ838389.pdf [DOI:10.64152/10125/66632]

18. Fraser, C. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 225-241. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263199002041]

19. Freeman, D. (2014). Reading comprehension questions: the distribution of different types in global EFL textbooks. N, Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: content, consumption, production (pp. 72-110). UK: Palgrave Macmillan. [DOI:10.1057/9781137276285_3]

20. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97-118. [DOI:10.1017/S0261444807004144]

21. Hall, R., Greenberg, D., Laures-Gore, J., & Pae, H. K. (2014). The relationship between expressive vocabulary knowledge and reading skills for adult struggling readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 87-100. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01537.x]

22. Heitler, D. (2005). Teaching with authentic materials. United Kingdom: Pearson Education.

23. Huong, D. T. (2020). Teachers' and students' perspectives on using authentic materials in teaching English at Hanoi University of Home Affairs. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(07), 683-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.10.07.2020.p10375 [DOI:10.29322/IJSRP.10.07.2020.p10375]

24. Hwang, C. C. (2005). Effective EFL education through popular authentic materials. Asian EFL Journal, 7(1), 12-101. https://madevada.pbworks.com/f/Authentic+materials.pdf

25. Ifanc, C., & Wales, Y. (2010). Guidance on the teaching of higher-order reading skills: INSET opportunities for teachers of all subjects across the curriculum at key stages 2 and 3. UK: Crown.

26. Isir, E., & Uyar, Y. (2022). Investigating reading comprehension questions and student-generated questions in language lessons in terms of level. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(4), 440-455. doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.676 [DOI:10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.676]

27. Javed, M., Eng, L. S., & Mohamed, A. (2015). Developing reading comprehension modules to facilitate reading comprehension among Malaysian secondary school ESL students. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 139-154. [DOI:10.12973/iji.2015.8211a]

28. Khalid, S., & Gulyamova, M. (2024). Implementing authentic materials to develop students' reading skills in English language classes. Western European Journal of Linguistics and Education, 2(4), 186-190. https://westerneuropeanstudies.com/index.php/2/article/view/668

29. Ketchum, E. M. (2006). The cultural baggage of second language reading: An approach to understanding the practices and perspectives of a non-native product. Foreign Language Annals, 39(1), 22-42. [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02247.x]

30. Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing higher level thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1-9. http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09423.pdf

31. Little, D., S. Devitt & D. Singleton. (1989). Learning foreign languages from authentic texts: Theory and practice. Dublin: Authentik.

32. Mainali, B. P. (2012). Higher order thinking in education. Academic Voices: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 5-10. [DOI:10.3126/av.v2i1.8277]

33. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267-296. [DOI:10.1037/a0021890]

34. Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51(2), 144-156. [DOI:10.1093/elt/51.2.144]

35. Rodrigo, V. Greenberg, D., & Segal, D. (2014). Changes in reading habits by low literate adults through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 73-91. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1031313.pdf [DOI:10.64152/10125/66688]

36. San, K. M. (2019). The thinking levels demanded in reading activities in the coursebook Global A2+. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(5), 23-36. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2019/May-2019/03.pdf

37. Tomlison, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143-179. [DOI:10.1017/S0261444811000528]

38. Usman, F., & Muslem, A. (2019). Analysis of reading comprehension questions by using revised Bloom taxonomy on higher order thinking skills (HOTS). English Education Journal, 10(1), 1-15. file:///C:/Users/SMA/Downloads/13253-35419-1-SM.pdf

39. Vittori, G., Casado Ledesma, L., Tesone, S., & Trachi, C. (2024). Key language, cognitive, and higher-order skills for L2 reading comprehension of expository texts in English as a foreign language students: a systematic review. Reading and Writing, 37, 2481-2519. [DOI:10.1007/s11145-023-10479-3]

40. Yu, H. C. (2006). A case study in the application of authentic materials texts. Canadian Social Science, 2(6), 23-31.

41. Yuet, C., & Chan, H. (2003). Cultural content and reading proficiency: A comparison of mainland Chinese and Hong Kong learners of English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 60 - 69. [DOI:10.1080/07908310308666657]