Volume 11, Issue 2 (7-2026)
IJREE 2026, 11(2): 17-34 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Panahi M, Madadi Asl Z. (2026). The Impact of Chatbot-Based Dialogue on Pragmatic Competence Development: 11th-Grade Iranian EFL Learners in Focus. IJREE. 11(2),
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-1076-en.html
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-1076-en.html
Department of Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (896 Views)
Objective: Technology-based instruction is gaining momentum in the field of language learning. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Chatbot-Based Dialogue on learners’ pragmatic competence development in an EFL context which is frequently overlooked in conventional classrooms.
Methods: To this end, sixty female Azerbaijani students were chosen randomly from two public high schools in Ardabil, Iran. The participants were selected based on their scores on a pre-test designed to determine the homogeneity of their performance levels. They were assigned randomly to a control group (who practiced speech acts including making requests, making refusals, making apologies and making compliments through textbook based role playing) and an experimental group (who practiced similar speech acts with an AI chatbot for a total of ten weeks; 2 sessions per week). Pre and post-test data were collected for each individual to assess their ability to produce and recognize correct forms of language used in the context of the test.
Results: The statistical analysis of the data indicated that the experimental group experienced statistically more significant increases in their pragmatic competence than did the control group. Participants also offered positive feedback in brief individual interviews regarding their level of interest and their perceived ability to communicate.
Conclusion: The results of this study boosted the use of AI chatbots as an effective tool to supplement EFL instruction by providing learners with an interactive and low pressure environment to practice linguistic accuracy and awareness of how to use appropriate forms of speech pragmatically.
Methods: To this end, sixty female Azerbaijani students were chosen randomly from two public high schools in Ardabil, Iran. The participants were selected based on their scores on a pre-test designed to determine the homogeneity of their performance levels. They were assigned randomly to a control group (who practiced speech acts including making requests, making refusals, making apologies and making compliments through textbook based role playing) and an experimental group (who practiced similar speech acts with an AI chatbot for a total of ten weeks; 2 sessions per week). Pre and post-test data were collected for each individual to assess their ability to produce and recognize correct forms of language used in the context of the test.
Results: The statistical analysis of the data indicated that the experimental group experienced statistically more significant increases in their pragmatic competence than did the control group. Participants also offered positive feedback in brief individual interviews regarding their level of interest and their perceived ability to communicate.
Conclusion: The results of this study boosted the use of AI chatbots as an effective tool to supplement EFL instruction by providing learners with an interactive and low pressure environment to practice linguistic accuracy and awareness of how to use appropriate forms of speech pragmatically.
Keywords: AI learning, Chatbot-based Language learning, English as a foreign language, Pragmatic competence, Technology-enhanced instruction
References
1. Alharbi, S. (2024). Affective variables in AI mediated EFL interaction: Implications for pragmatic development. Computers & Education, 205, 104676.
2. Almehaidly, N. (2024). Pragmatics in the Saudi EFL classroom: Investigating textbook content and teachers' perceptions and practices. [DOI:10.17863/CAM.114532]
3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
4. Bahari, A., Smith, M., & Scott, H. (2024). Examining the impact of chatbot-based language learning support, adaptive learning algorithms, and virtual reality language immersion on EFL learners' language learning proficiency and self-regulated learning skills. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 15(1), 17-33. [DOI:10.14505/jres.v15.1(17).02]
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Su, Y. (2019). Integrating instructed second language research, pragmatics, and corpus-based instruction. In R. M. DeKeyser, & G. P. Botana (Eds.), Doing SLA research with implications for the classroom reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability (pp. 55-81). (Language Learning and Language Teaching; Vol. 52). John Benjamins Publishing Company. [DOI:10.1075/lllt.52.04bar]
6. Belda-Medina, J., & Kokoskova, S. (2023). Chatbots as conversation tutors: AI in language learning. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377563272_Chatbots_as_conversation_tutors_AI_in_language_learning
7. Gholami, A., Ahmadi, S., & Taheri, H. (2024). Iranian EFL learners' speaking improvement and the use of chatbots in the light of digital literacy: An explanatory mixed-methods investigation. Language Horizons, 9(3), 7-31.
8. Gu, J., & Liu, Q. (2025). Enhancing Chinese EFL University Students' self-regulated learning through AI chatbot intervention: Insights from achievement goal theory. Learning and Motivation, 92. [DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102191]
9. Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2023). Raising EFL learners' pragmatic competence via teaching compliments: The case of explicit vs. implicit instruction in focus. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 13(2), 25-42. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Journal/jslte/DownloadFile/911454
10. Islamov, A. (2021). The impact of AI on pragmatic competence. English for Specific Purposes World. https://espeap.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/espeap/article/download/1570/755
11. Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
12. Koç, F. Ş., & Savaş, P. (2024). The use of artificially intelligent chatbots in English language learning: A systematic meta-synthesis study of articles published between 2010 and 2024. ReCALL, 37(1), 4-21. [DOI:10.1017/S0958344024000168]
13. Lin, C., & Mubarok, H. (2025). AI conversational agents and socio-pragmatic awareness in EFL classrooms. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Technology, 18(2), 145-168.
14. Park, J., & Lee, S. (2023). AI chatbots as social partners in EFL learning: Impacts on interactional competence. Language Learning & Technology, 27(3), 112-130.
15. Pourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Rafiee, F. (2024). A comparative study on the impact of online and offline blended teaching on listening performance. IJREE, 9(4), 33-55.
16. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-951-en.html
17. Rahman, M., Khan, S., & Fatima, N. (2025). The effectiveness of AI-powered chatbots in enhancing pragmatic competence of Pakistani undergraduate ESL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. https://tpls.academypublication.com/index.php/tpls/article/download/11003/9153/35835 [DOI:10.17507/tpls.1510.05]
18. Rahimi, M., & Dastjerdi, H. (2025). AI chatbots for pragmatic instruction in Iranian EFL contexts. Journal of Language Teaching and Technology, 12(1), 45-62.
19. Róg, T. (2025). Pragmatics in second language acquisition: Overview of selected issues. In Task-based Language Teaching and Beyond: L2 Pragmatics Instruction for Young Learners. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-86566-4_1]
20. Santos, A., & Ribeiro, M. (2024). Real time chatbot feedback and pragmatic development. ReCALL, 36(1), 55-78.
21. Tahir, R. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT as a peer interaction partner in enhancing pragmatic competence among EFL learners. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rawshan-Tahir- [DOI:10.25130/Lang.9.2.14]
22. Taguchi, N. (2015). "Contextually" speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class, and online. System, 48, 3-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2014.09.001]
23. Üstünbaş, Ü. (2024). Hey, GPT, can we have a chat? A case study on EFL learners' AI speaking practice. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 8(1), 91-107. [DOI:10.51383/ijonmes.2024.318]
24. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
25. Youn, S.J. (2018). Second Language Pragmatics. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. [DOI:10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_38]
26. Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2024). Teaching speech acts through AI chatbots: Effects on appropriateness and fluency. System, 119, 103012.
27. Wu, X., & Li, R. (2024). Unraveling effects of AI chatbots on EFL learners' language skill development: A meta-analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00853-2 [DOI:10.1007/s40299-024-00766-9]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
This work is licensed under a Creative Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)