Volume 4, Issue 2 (6-2019)                   IJREE 2019, 4(2): 14-28 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

khorami Fard S, Derakhshi Z. On the Role of Dynamic Assessment on Promotion of Writing Linguistic Accuracy among EFL Learners: An Interventionist Model. IJREE. 2019; 4 (2)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-182-en.html
English Department, Yasouj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasouj, Iran
Abstract:   (1024 Views)
This study is conducted under the domain of Vygotskian Socio-cultural Theory (SCT) of mind and the notion of dynamic assessment to elevate the linguistic accuracy of EFL learners’ writing skill. 40 homogenous intermediate EFL learners from four intact classes were divided into two dynamic assessment (DA) and non-dynamic assessment (NDA) groups. As a pre-test, the participants were given writing topics during a course to assess their writing linguistic abilities. After analyzing and scoring the compositions’ errors based on four consecutive stages to error analysis and a model of linguistic errors (grammatical, syntactic, substance, and lexical), the type and frequency of errors’ sub-categories related to each category (n=516) was detected. Afterwards, the DA group went through intervention/mediation (interventionist dynamic assessment) based on their pre-test errors in five sessions, while non-dynamic assessment group received no mediation and feedback. The pre-test-mediation-post-test design (sandwich model of dynamic assessment) was used in this study. After mediation, as a post-test, both groups entered the second course of language learning and like pre-test their compositions during the course were analyzed and scored to see the effect of dynamic assessment on learners’ writing ability. Analysis of data through descriptive statistics and statistical analysis showed that the experimental group who received mediations, unlike control group, solved their writing difficulties extensively and outperformed the control group with a significant difference. In other words, application of DA as an alternative procedure to standard testing has a positive effect on both test performance and writing linguistic accuracy of EFL learners.
 
Full-Text [PDF 612 kb]   (167 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General

References
1. Abdolrezapour, P., Tavakoli, M., & Ketabi, S. (2014). Qualitative analysis of mediational strategies in emotionalized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(1), 51-66. doi:10.5861/ijrsll.2013.506 [DOI:10.5861/ijrsll.2013.506]
2. Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (eds.), sociocultural theory and the Teaching of Second languages. (pp. 57-86). London, Equinox.
3. Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/11063
4. Ajideh, P., & Nourdad, N. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading comprehension in different proficiency levels. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 101-122. doi: 10.1186/2229-0443-2-4-101 [DOI:10.1186/2229-0443-2-4-101]
5. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. https://www.jstor.org/stable/328585 [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x]
6. Alemi, M. (2015). The impact of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL students' writing self-assessment. ELL, 9(1), 145-169. doi: 10.22132/tel.2015.53735
7. Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576-598. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x]
8. Dunn, W. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Krashen's i+1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48(3), 411-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00048 [DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00048]
9. Ellis. R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice. Clinical and educational applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607516 [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511607516]
11. Hidri, S. (2014). Comparison of the students' performance in dynamic vs. static listening comprehension tests among EFL learners. In article published in the Proceedings of the 19th TESOL Arabia Conference, From KG to College to Career. 51-59.
12. Hubbard, P., Jones, H., Thornton, B., & Wheeler, R. (1996). A training course for TEFL. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Isavi, E. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on Iranian L2 writing performance. Retrieved August 25, 2017, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530902
14. Kozulin, A, & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733 [DOI:10.1177%2F0143034302023001733]
15. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom (CALPER Professional Development Document CPDD-0411). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research.
16. MacKey, A., & Gass, S. (2006). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.
17. MIAO, T., & Lv, M. (2013). Dynamic assessment in ESL writing classroom. International Conference on Education Technology and Management Science, ICETMS, Beijing, Technology and Business University, 2013. China, Published by Atlantis Press. [DOI:10.2991/icetms.2013.1]
18. Minick, N. (1987). Implications of Vygotsky's theories for dynamic assessment. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactive approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 116-140). New York: The Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-98593-004
19. Napitupulu, S. (2017). Analyzing linguistic errors in writing an English letter: A case study of Indonesian undergraduate students, International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(3), 71-77.doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20170503.12 [DOI:10.11648/j.ijll.20170503.12]
20. Parsi, P. P., & Sanavi, R. V. (2015). The effects of dynamic assessment on improving writing ability of intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. 8(2), 73-88.
21. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P., (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49-72. https://pennstate.pure.elsevier.com [DOI:10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872]
22. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233-265. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa [DOI:10.1191%2F1362168805lr166oa]
23. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf. J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA) Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362168813482935 [DOI:10.1177/1362168813482935]
24. Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/6627
25. Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). An Analysis of Errors in Written English Sentences: A Case Study of Thai EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 101-110. doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n3p101 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n3p101 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v10n3p101]
26. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ615905 [DOI:10.3102/0013189X029007004]
27. Shrestha, P. (2011). Dynamic assessment of academic writing for business studies. Ph.D. Doctoral Thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes. http//:www.isfla.org/Systemics/Print/Theses/Thesis-FINAL-Prithvi-Shrestha.pdf
28. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-01422-000
29. Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 374-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.374 [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.374]
30. Taheri, R., & Dastgerdi, V. H. (2016). Impact of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL learners' picture-cued writing. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and research, 4(13), 129-144. http//:jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_561178.html
31. Teo, k. (2012). Effects of dynamic assessment on College EFL learners' reading skills. THE JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 9(1), 57-94. www.asiatefl.org/main/download_pdf.php?i=104&c=1419300554
32. Tzuriel, D. (2000). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 385-435. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009032414088 [DOI:10.1023/A:1009032414088]
33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between Learning and Development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
35. Wang, P (2015). The effect of dynamic assessment on the listening skills of lower-intermediate EFL learners in Chinese technical college: A pilot study. Journal of Language Teaching and research, 6(6), 1269-1279. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.14 [DOI:10.17507/jltr.0606.14]
36. Xiaoxiao, L., & Yan, L. (2010). A case study of dynamic assessment in EFL process writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 24-40. www.celea.org.cn/teic/89/10042202.pdf

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb