Volume 5, Issue 2 (6-2020)                   IJREE 2020, 5(2): 29-48 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseini G, Izadpanah S, Fasih P. The Effects of Metacognitive Strategy Training on Improving Iranian EFL Learners’ Listening Performance and the Similarities and Differences Across Three Elementary, Intermediate and Advanced Proficiency Levels. IJREE. 2020; 5 (2)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-298-en.html
Department of English Language Teaching, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract:   (1163 Views)
The present study was an investigation of metacognitive strategy training on improving Iranian EFL learners’ listening performance and the differences and similarities at three levels of elementary, intermediate, and advanced levels. Few studies have been conducted to investigate three levels. So, 348 third grade female senior high school students of Zanjan/Iran were selected through multistage cluster random sampling method and based on Cambridge placement test (2010), 116, 132, and 100 students in 3 elementary, advanced, and control groups participated in this experimental study. During two months and over period of nine forty-minute sessions, students in experimental groups received metacognitive and listening instructions. To address the research question, ANOVA test was conducted and the results showed that there were meaningful differences between students’ performance and the students of experimental advanced group showed more improvement than students in experimental intermediate and elementary groups, and students of intermediate experimental group showed more improvement than students in experimental elementary group. The implication of the study is that metacognitive strategy training should be incorporated into the regular listening teaching programs to help students become more effective listeners.
 
Full-Text [PDF 957 kb]   (149 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Altuwairesh, N. (2016). EFL Saudi undergraduate students' use of metacognitive listening strategies. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(1), 1-16. doi: [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2803998]
2. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. London: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511732959]
3. Bozorgian, H. (2012). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. ISRN Education, 2012, 1-6. doi:10.5402/2012/734085 [DOI:10.5402/2012/734085]
4. Bozorgian, H., & Alamdari, E. F. (2018). Multimedia listening comprehension: Metacognitive instruction or metacognitive instruction through dialogic interaction. ReCALL, 30(1), 131-152. doi: [DOI:10.1017/S0958344016000240]
5. Carrier, K. A. (2003). Improving high school English language learners' second language listening through strategy instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 383-408. [DOI:10.1080/15235882.2003.10162600]
6. Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic journal of foreign language teaching, 1(1), 14-26. https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v1n12004/chamot.pdf
7. Chou, M. H. (2017). A task-based language teaching approach to developing metacognitive strategies for listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 31(1), 51-70. doi: [DOI:10.1080/10904018.2015.1098542]
8. Coshkun, A. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth Language), 4(1), 35-50. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509339.pdf
9. Demetriou, A., Efklides, A., Platsidou, M., & Campbell, R. L. (1993). The architecture and dynamics of developing mind: Experiential structuralism as a frame for unifying cognitive developmental theories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(5), 1-205. doi: 10.2307/1166053 [DOI:10.2307/1166053]
10. Demetriou, A., & Kazi, S. (2006). Self-awareness in g (with processing efficiency and reasoning). Intelligence, 34(3), 297-317. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2005.10.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2005.10.002]
11. Downing, K., Kwong, T., Chan, S. W., Lam, T. F., & Downing, W. K. (2009). Problem-based learning and the development of metacognition. Higher Education, 57(5), 609-621. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40269147 [DOI:10.1007/s10734-008-9165-x]
12. Fasih, P., Izadpanah, S., & Shahnavaz, A. (2018). The effect of mnemonic vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension of students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 49-59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.49 [DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.49]
13. Fasih, P., Izadpanah, S., & Shahnavaz, A. (2018). The effects of mnemonic vocabulary instruction on content vocabulary learning of students. Journal of Language and Education, 4(1), 42-62. doi: [DOI:10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-1-42-62]
14. Fathi, J., & Hamidizadeh, R. (2019). The contribution of listening strategy instruction to improving second language listening comprehension: A case of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 17-32. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6961/822fa6d20b875914b4c4e4b4bce5c0b06012.pdf [DOI:10.29333/iji.2019.1222a]
15. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. http://www.sciepub.com/reference/146040
16. Gay, L. R. (1992). Education research competencies for analysis and application. London: Charles E. Milton Keynes Philadelphia Company.
17. Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice, and research implications. Regional Language Centre Journal, 39(2), 188 -213. doi: 10.1177/0033688208092184 [DOI:10.1177/0033688208092184]
18. Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT journal, 60(3), 222-232. doi: [DOI:10.1093/elt/ccl002]
19. Graham, S. (2003). Learner strategies and advanced level listening comprehension. Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 64-69. doi: [DOI:10.1080/09571730385200221]
20. Ko, L. Y. (2019). A study of metacognitive strategies utilized in reading and listening comprehension: an investigation of nursing junior college English Learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(11), 176-188. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.2588059
21. Maftoon, P., & Fakhri Alamdari, E. (2020). Exploring the effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on metacognitive awareness and listening performance through a process-based approach. International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 1-20. doi: [DOI:10.1080/10904018.2016.1250632]
22. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315105642]
23. Mendelsohn, D., & Lynch, T. (2013). Listening: An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 190-206). New York: Routledge.
24. Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. The MIT Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-97967-000 [DOI:10.7551/mitpress/4561.001.0001]
25. Mevarech, Z., & Fridkin, S. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and meta-cognition. Metacognition and learning, 1(1), 85-97. [DOI:10.1007/s11409-006-6584-x]
26. Mobaraki, M., & Nia, M. R. (2018). The effect of listening strategy instruction on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners' listening ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 188-192. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.188 [DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.188]
27. Moritz, S., & Lysaker, P. H. (2018). Metacognition-What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions. Schizophrenia Research. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001]
28. Newton, J., & Nguyen, C. D. (2018). Integrating listening and speaking. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 2(7), 1-7. doi: [DOI:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0602]
29. OGATA, A. (2017). The impact of metacognitive-based strategy instruction on learners' listening performance: Case of first-year EFL students at the University of Tlemcen (M.A. Thesis). Department of English, Faculty of Letters and Languages, University of Tlemcen, People's Democratic Republic of Algeria. http://dspace.univ-tlemcen.dz/bitstream/112/11221/1/ogata-ammara.pdf
30. O'malley, J. M., O'Malley, M. J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. U.K: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524490]
31. Oxford, R. L. (Ed.). (2003). Language learning styles and strategies, 3(1), 1-25. https://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf
32. Phillips, D. (2008). Introductory Course for the TOEFL Test - iBT. Pearson Education.
33. Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: an overview. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 31, 73-81. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.019]
34. Rezvan, S., Ahmadi, S. A., & Abedi, M. R. (2006). The effects of metacognitive training on the academic achievement and happiness of Esfahan University conditional students. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19(4), 415-428. doi: [DOI:10.1080/09515070601106471]
35. Taheri, M., & Taki, S. (2017). The effect of dictogloss on listening comprehension: Focus on metacognitive strategies and gender. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(7), 23-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.23 [DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.23]
36. Tan, C. C., Chen, C. M., & Lee, H. M. (2019). Effectiveness of a digital pen-based learning system with a reward mechanism to improve learners' metacognitive strategies in listening. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(7), 1-26. doi: [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2019.1591459]
37. Vandergrift, L. (2003). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students: Through the process of L2 listening.  Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 59(3), 425-440. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.59.3.425 [DOI:10.3138/cmlr.59.3.425]
38. Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? Modern Language Journal, 90(1) 6-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00381.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00381.x]
39. Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language learning, 56(3), 431-462. doi: [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x]
40. Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language learning, 60(2), 470-497. doi: [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x]
41. Van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. (2014). Metacognitive skills and intellectual ability of young adolescents: A longitudinal study from a developmental perspective. European journal of psychology of education, 29(1), 117-137. doi: [DOI:10.1007/s10212-013-0190-5]
42. Wong, B. S. C. (2012). Metacognitive awareness, procrastination and academic performance of university students in Hong Kong. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9139/d071b99e2f5c5b281def905dff0fafd33e55.pdf

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb