Volume 2, Issue 2 (6-2017)                   IJREE 2017, 2(2): 16-29 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahdiloo A, Izadpanah S. The Impact of Humorous Movie Clips on Better Learning of English Language Vocabulary. IJREE. 2017; 2 (2)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-45-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Zanjan branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
Abstract:   (2120 Views)

This study examined the effects of humorous movie clips on better learning of English language vocabulary. Humor is an important human behavior that plays a vital role in communication and social interactions. This subject has been rarely investigated in Iranian English classes. The researchers used quantitative method. Because all of variables were not controllable, therefore quasi-experimental method was employed to conduct the study. To this end, a proficiency test was administered to 60 Iranian EFL learners. Then 48 intermediate language learners who were homogeneous based on their rank scores were chosen and randomly divided into two equal groups (i.e. 24 as experimental and 24 as control groups). To assess their vocabulary knowledge at the beginning of the study, both groups participated in a researcher-made, 30-items and multiple choice vocabulary test adapted from PET test and scored out of 30. Experimental group watched the humorous movie clips but the participants in control group taught in a conventional way. After 10 sessions of treatment, both groups were tested on the similar items covered in the pre-test. The effect of humorous movie clips on the groups’ vocabulary achievement was evaluated through Paired Samples t-test analysis. Results have shown that the  experimental group outperformed  the control group since humorous movie clips had a positive effect on developing vocabulary learning among intermediate EFL learners (p<05) in the experimental group.  EFL teachers can use humorous movie clips to raise the learners’ motivation.

Full-Text [PDF 806 kb]   (1259 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Aria, M. R., & Izadpanah, S. (2017). The influence of Weblog on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' attitude towards writing. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 7(3), 64-69.
2. Askildson, L. (2005). Effects of humor in the language classroom: Humor as a pedagogical tool in theory and practice. Arizona Working Papers in SLAT, 12(1), 45-61.
3. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-601. [DOI:10.1126/science.1736359] [PMID]
4. Bahrani, T., & Soltani, R. (2011). The pedagogical values of cartoons. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(4), 19-22.
5. Baringer, D. K., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Immediacy in the classroom: Student immediacy. Communication Education, 49(2), 178-186. [DOI:10.1080/03634520009379204]
6. Berger, J. (1987). Notes on using video in the language classroom. If you can read this, thank TV. TESOL Journal, 6(2), 15-18.
7. Berwald, J. P. (1992). Teaching French language and culture by means of humor. French Review, 189-200. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/397569
8. Booth-Butterfield, M., & Wanzer, M. B. (2010). Humor and communication in instructional contexts: Goal-oriented communication. The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction, 221-239.
9. Butler-Pascoe, M. E., & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and teaching English language learners. MA: Pearson Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J025v20n01_09 [DOI:10.1300/J025v20n01_09]
10. Cann, A., Davis, H. B., & Zapata, C. L. (2011). Humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 24 (1), 1-20. doi: [DOI:10.1515/humr.2011.001]
11. Chen, G. H., & Martin, R. A. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research, 20(3), 215-234. doi: [DOI:10.1515/HUMOR.2007.011]
12. Chua, Y. P. (2012). Using content-based humorous cartoons in learning materials to improve students' reading rate, comprehension and motivation: It is a wrong technique? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 352-361. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.042]
13. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x]
14. Clark, C. D. (2013). Books worth (re-) reading: The act of creation by Arthur Koestler (1969). International Journal of Play, 2(3), 297-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2013.849138 [DOI:10.1080/21594937.2013.849138]
15. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119239086 [DOI:10.1002/9781119239086]
16. Davies, C. E. (2003). How English-learners joke with native speakers: an interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of pragmatics, 35(9), 1361-1385. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00181-9]
17. Dehjalali, M. R., & Izadpanah, S. (2017). The study of vocabulary awareness effect on intermediate language learners' depth of vocabulary knowledge in Genuine Persian texts. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(1), 185-191. doi: [DOI:10.5539/ijel.v7n1p185]
18. Deneire, M. (1995). Humor and foreign language teaching. Humor, 8, 285-285. doi: [DOI:10.1515/humr.1995.8.3.285]
19. Duquette, L., & Painchaud, G. (1996). A comparison of vocabulary acquisition in audio and video contexts. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(1) 143-172. [DOI:10.3138/cmlr.53.1.143]
20. Earleywine, M. (2010). Humor 101. Springer Publishing Company. [DOI:10.1891/9780826106094]
21. Filipowicz, A. (2006). From positive affect to creativity: The surprising role of surprise. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 141-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1802_2 [DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj1802_2]
22. Fisher R. (1997). Games for thinking. Oxford: Nash Pollock.
23. Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.
24. Garner, R. L. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha!. College Teaching, 54(1), 177-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180 [DOI:10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180]
25. Ghaderi, V., & Afshinfar, J. (2014). A comparative study of the effects of animated versus static funny pictures on Iranian intermediate EFL students' intake and retention of idioms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 522-531. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.448]
26. Ghanei Motlagh, F., Motallebzade, K., & Fatemi, M. A. (2014). On the effects of teacher's sense of humor on Iranian's EFL learners' reading comprehension ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(4), 1-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.1 [DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.1]
27. Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39(1), 46-62. [DOI:10.1080/03634529009378786]
28. Gruner, C. R. (1967). The effect of humor on speaker ethos and audience information gain. J. Commun, 17, 228-233. [DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1967.tb01181.x]
29. Gruner, C. R. (1970). The effects of humor in dull and interesting informative speeches. Cent. States Speech J. 21, 160-166. [DOI:10.1080/10510977009363017]
30. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722-738. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013]
31. Izadpanah, S., & Alavi, M. (2016). The perception of EFL high school students in using of computer technology in the process of learning: merits and demerits. Advances in Language and Literary Studies (ALLS), 7(3), 146-156. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.3p.146 [DOI:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.3p.146]
32. Jones, G. H. (2014). Humor to the rescue: how to make introductory economics an appealing social science for non-majors. American Journal of Business Education (Online), 7(2), 151-159. [DOI:10.19030/ajbe.v7i2.8474]
33. Ketabi, S., & Simm, I. S. (2009). Investigating Persian EFL teachers and learners' attitudes towards humor in class. International Journal of Language Studies, 3(4), 65-83.
34. Kher, N., Molstad, S., & Donahue, R. (1999). Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness in dread courses. College Student Journal, 33(3), 86-102.
35. Lier, L. V. (2007). Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 46-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/illt42.0 [DOI:10.2167/illt42.0]
36. Long, D. L., & Graesser, A. C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 35-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544690 [DOI:10.1080/01638538809544690]
37. Luo, J. J. (2004). Using DVD films to enhance college freshmen's English listening comprehension and motivation. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu. Taiwan, R.O.C.
38. Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA/London.
39. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages: The case of multimedia explanations. Document Design, 1, 7-20. [DOI:10.1075/dd.1.1.02may]
40. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760-766. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760] [PMID]
41. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511811678]
42. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Research-based principles for multimedia learning. Retrieved from http://hilt.harvard.edu/event/richard-e-mayer-uc-santa-barbara
43. Medgyes, P. (2002). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. ELT Journal, 56(3), 333-335. doi: 10.2307/40264518 [DOI:10.2307/40264518]
44. Mekheimer, M. A. A. G. (2011). The impact of using videos on whole language learning in EFL context. Arab World English Journal, 2(2), 5-39.
45. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326. [DOI:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2]
46. Nazarian, S., & Izadpanah, S. (2017). The study of the metalinguistic knowledge of English by students in an intensive and a traditional course. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(1), 215- 221. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n1p215 [DOI:10.5539/ijel.v7n1p215]
47. Neuliep, J. W. (1991). An examination of the content of high school teachers' humor in the classroom and the development of an inductively derived taxonomy of classroom humor. Communication Education, 40(4), 343-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529109378859 [DOI:10.1080/03634529109378859]
48. Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Essentials of educational psychology: Big ideas to guide effective teaching. Pearson Higher Ed.
49. Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(2), 155-178. [DOI:10.3138/cmlr.52.2.155]
50. Rawlings, D. (2013). Humor preference and the Autism Quotient in an undergraduate sample. Humor, 26(3), 411-421. doi: [DOI:10.1515/humor-2013-0028]
51. Samson, A. C., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Humor as emotion regulation: The differential consequences of negative versus positive humor. Cognition & Emotion, 26(2), 375-384. doi: 10.1080/02699931
52. Schmidt, S. R., & Williams, A. R. (2001). Memory for humorous cartoons. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 305-311. doi: 10.3758/BF03194924 [DOI:10.3758/BF03194924]
53. Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 49-69. doi: [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511816819.005]
54. Secules, T., Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 76, 480-490. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb05396.x]
55. Shahlou, P., & Izadpanah, S. (2016). The study of relationship between EFL teacher's teaching context and their attitudes towards computer assisted language learning. The Social Sciences, 11(29), 7018-7024.
56. Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [PMID]
57. Tabatabaei, O., & Gahroei, F. R. (2011). The contribution of movie clips to idiom learning improvement of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(8), 990-1000. [DOI:10.4304/tpls.1.8.990-1000]
58. Trachtenberg, S. (1979). Joke telling as a tool in ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 89-99. [DOI:10.2307/3585979]
59. Wagner, M., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2011). The use of humor in the foreign language classroom: Funny and effective?. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 24(4), 399-434. [DOI:10.1515/humr.2011.024]
60. Withey, C. (2016). Using animations with students. The Legal Academic's Handbook, 42.
61. Ziyaeemehr, A., Kumar, V., & Abdullah, M. S. F. (2011). Use and non-use of humor in academic ESL classrooms. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 111-123. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n3p111 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v4n3p111]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb