Volume 3, Issue 2 (6-2018)                   IJREE 2018, 3(2): 34-47 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fouladi Nashta J, Rahimy D R. An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Dialogue Shadowing Technique (DST) on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Conversation Ability. IJREE. 2018; 3 (2)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-98-en.html
Department of English Language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
Abstract:   (878 Views)
The aim of the current study was to investigate whether L2 dialogue shadowing practice would have an effect on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ conversation ability. For this purpose, 30 Iranian intermediate EFL learners at Padideh language center participated in the experiment of the study. The participants were divided into two groups of 15 who were assigned to the experimental and control group of the study randomly. A pretest of conversation ability was administered to both groups, the experimental group received 10 sessions of teaching L2 conversation as well as dialogue shadowing technique (DST) while the control group received a placebo, in other words, teaching L2 conversation via existing method. After the treatment, the same test was administered as posttest to both groups of study. The data obtained from the tests in this study were analyzed via independent sample T-test between performance of the groups, and the paired-sample T-test was used between the pretest and posttest of each group to show the progress. The results revealed that Iranian EFL learners in the experimental group performed better and received higher score in conversation test after 10 sessions of treatment.

 
Full-Text [PDF 500 kb]   (87 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Arguelles, A. (2010). Guide to autodidactic foreign language study. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 1(1), 12-23. www.foreignlanguageexpertise.com/foreign_language_study.html
2. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations of language testing. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
3. Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of language teaching and learning. Oxford University Press, (4th ed.). New York: Longman. (121-134)
4. Bygate, M. (2002). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks. Second language learning teaching and testing, 23-49.
5. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47. doi: 10.1093/applin/I.1.1 [DOI:10.1093/applin/I.1.1]
6. Chen, Y. C. (2007). A study on the efficacy of consecutive interpretation training. Unpublished Master Thesis. National Changhua Normal University, Taiwan.
7. Costa, A., Pickering, M. J., & Sorace, A. (2008). Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 528—556. doi:10.1080/01690960801920545 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960801920545 [DOI:10.1080/01690960801920545]
8. Hamada, Y. (2012). An effective way to improve listening skills through shadowing. The Language Teacher, 36(1), 3-10.
9. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Eds), Second Language Acquisition (pp. 401-435), Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
10. Lambert, S. (1992). Shadowing. Meta, 37(2), 263-273. URI: id.erudit.org/iderudit/003378ar doi: 10.7202/003378ar [DOI:10.7202/003378ar]
11. Lee, J. F., & Van Patten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228. doi: 10.2307/3586827 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3586827 [DOI:10.2307/3586827]
13. Murphey, T. (1995). Conversational shadowing for rapport and interactional language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Second Language Research in Japan. International University of Japan, 42-65.
14. Nicholson, N. (1990). Strategy, innovation and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 27(5), 511–534. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1990.tb00259.x]
15. Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Newbury House. [PMCID]
16. Palmér, A. (2010). Muntligt i klassrummet. Om tal, samtal och bedömning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
17. Rahimy, R., & Asaei, S. M. (2012). Audio texts and English speaking ability: Evidence from Iranian EFL learners. Academic Research International, 3(2), 607-616.
18. Rönnerdahl, G., & Johansson, S. (2005). Introducing English pronunciation -Advice for learners and teachers. Lund: Student literature.
19. Rost, M. (2005). L2 Listening. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 503–527). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2006). Top Notch series: English for today's world. White Plains, New York: Pearson Education.
21. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (23-45). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
22. Savignon, S J. (2005). Cultures and comparisons: Strategies for learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 357–365. [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02222.x]
23. Svalberg, A. M. (2007). Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308. [DOI:10.1017/S0261444807004491]
24. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb