Iranian EFL Learners’ Academic Self Efficacy, Metacognitive Reading Strategies, and Reading Comprehension Achievement: Exploring the Relationships and Predicting Roles

Moafian, Nahid; Ghafournia, Narjes

Volume 10, Issue 2 (6-2025) IJREE 2025, 10(2): 79-98 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Moafian N, Ghafournia N. (2025). Iranian EFL Learners’ Academic Self Efficacy, Metacognitive Reading Strategies, and Reading Comprehension Achievement: Exploring the Relationships and Predicting Roles. IJREE. 10(2),
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-984-en.html

Iranian EFL Learners’ Academic Self Efficacy, Metacognitive Reading Strategies, and Reading Comprehension Achievement: Exploring the Relationships and Predicting Roles

Nahid Moafian

, Narjes Ghafournia ^*

Department of English, Ne.C., Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran.

Abstract: (1924 Views)

This study scrutinized the probable significant relationships among Iranian EFL learners’ academic self-efficacy, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension test performance. Relevantly, the significant predicting roles of the learners’ metacognitive reading strategies as well as academic self-efficacy for reading achievement were statistically investigated, increasing the depth of the study. Furthermore, the probable significant differences between the learners’ academic self-efficacy as well as the utilization of metacognitive reading strategies were investigated across three reading proficiency levels. To this end, 100 BA students, majoring in English Language Teaching at Islamic Azad University-Neyshabur Branch-Iran participated. Three standard instruments were employed, including academic self-efficacy and metacognitive reading strategies questionnaires along with the reading comprehension section of a TOEFL test. The study followed a quantitative correlational design. Since the normality of data was proved, the parametric statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficients, multiple regression analyses, and one-way analysis of variance were employed. The findings demonstrated significant positive relationships among the learners’ reading achievement, academic self-efficacy, and utilization of metacognitive reading strategies. In addition, it was found that metacognitive reading strategies can better predict reading comprehension than the learners’ academic self-efficacy. Academic self-efficacy was also proved as a significant predictor of the learners’ utilization of overall metacognitive reading strategies. No significant differences were proved between three proficiency levels in the utilization of metacognitive reading strategies as well as academic self-efficacy. The findings have some insightful pedagogical implications as well as some useful hints for language teachers and syllabus designers.

Keywords: academic self-efficacy, metacognitive reading strategies, reading achievement

Full-Text [PDF 946 kb] (919 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: General

References

1. Ahmadian, M., & Pasand, P. G. (2017). EFL learners' use of online metacognitive reading strategies and its relation to their self-efficacy in reading. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(2), 117-132.

2. Ali, A. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). A review of studies on cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in teaching reading comprehension for ESL/EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94-111. [DOI:10.5539/elt.v12n6p94]

3. Al-Jarf, R. (2021). Collaborative mobile ebook reading for struggling EFL college readers. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 11(06), 32-42. doi: 10.9790/7388-1106023242

4. Amiruddin, S. B., Mathla'ul, F., & Muh, H. (2022). The role of independent reading on reading comprehension in the second years students of MTs AS'ADIYAH Putra Sengkang. Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(3), 297-304. [DOI:10.51574/ijrer.v1i3.384]

5. Askari, N. (2023). Relationship between speed of reading and reading comprehension score in undergraduate students of EFLU: A disquisition. IJREE, 8(4), 17-31.

6. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-802-en.html

7. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.

8. Bafghi, G., T., Akrami, M., E., & Jamali, T. (2022). Studying the e-learning induced academic stress and its relationship with academic self-efficacy in the students of the Yazd Branch of Payame Noor. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 5(1), 105-112. [DOI:10.61186/ijes.5.1.105]

9. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.

10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

11. Barnett, M. A. (1989). More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading. Language and Education: Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall Regents, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632.

12. Blair, T. R., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2007). The effective teacher of reading: considering the "what" and "how" of instruction. Reading Teacher, 60(5), 432-438. [DOI:10.1598/RT.60.5.3]

14. Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281-2310. [DOI:10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w]

15. Cai, Y., & Zhao, C. (2023) Metacognitive strategies and self-efficacy co-shape L2 achievement: a multilevel structural equation modeling approach. System, 117, 103099. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2023.103099]

16. Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5-51. [DOI:10.1177/1529100618772271]

17. Chamba, M. Y., & Ramirez-Avila, M. R. (2021). Word recognition and reading skills to improve reading comprehension. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 20-36. doi:10.18196/ftl.v6i1.10174 [DOI:10.18196/ftl.v6i1.10174]

18. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. doi: [DOI:10.1017/S0267190505000061]

19. Chatman, T. (2015). Effective comprehension instructional strategies for improving the reading levels of students with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral Dissertation).

20. Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365. [DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00047-2]

21. Ferrara, S. L. N., (2005). Reading fluency and self-efficacy: A case study. International Journal of Disability, Developmental and Education, 52(3), 215-231. [DOI:10.1080/10349120500252858]

22. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906]

23. Foorman, B. R., Breier, J. I., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 24(2-3), 613-639. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2003.9651913 [DOI:10.1080/87565641.2003.9651913]

24. Ford, M. P., & Opitz, M. F. (2008). A national survey of guided reading practices: What we can learn from primary teachers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(4), 309-331. doi:10.1080/19388070802332895 [DOI:10.1080/19388070802332895]

25. Foroutan, M. B., & Sheikhy Behdani, R. A. (2024). Comparative investigation of the effects of metacognitive, cooperative and metacognitive-cooperative instructions on Iranian EFL learners' writing improvement. IJREE, 9(1), 70-83. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-872-en.html

26. Gentner, N., & Seufert, T. (2020). The double-edged interactions of prompts and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 15(2), 261-289. [DOI:10.1007/s11409-020-09227-7]

27. Ghadamgahi, M., & Ghafournia, N. (2022). Iranian EFL learners' metacognitive reading strategies and reading comprehension: a systematic review. International Journal of Language, Literature, Culture and History Studies 4(2), 1-10.

28. Ghafournia, N. (2014 a). Language learning strategy use and reading achievement. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 64-73. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n4p64 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v7n4p64]

29. Ghafournia, N. (2014 b). Relationship between university level and employment of language-learning strategies: a study of EAP learners. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 159-166. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n3p159 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v7n3p159]

30. Ghafournia, N. (2023). Exploring the predicting role of emotional intelligence (eq) in reading comprehension proficiency among iranian efl learners. International Journal of Research in English Education, 8(2), 47-66. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-761-en.html

31. Ghafournia, N., & Afghari, A. (2013 a). Exploring the Relationship between Learning Strategies, Academic Disciplines, and Reading Comprehension Test Performance. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 16 (2), 21-51.

32. Ghafournia, N., & Afghari, A. (2013 b). Relationship between reading proficiency, strategic competence, and reading comprehension test performance: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Education Studies, 6(8), 21- 30. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n8p21 [DOI:10.5539/ies.v6n8p21]

33. Graham, S., Woore, R., Porter, A., Courtney, L., & Savory, C. (2020). Navigating the challenges of L2 reading: Self-efficacy, self-regulatory reading strategies, and learner profiles. The Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 693-714. [DOI:10.1111/modl.12670]

34. Hoeh, E. (2015). Mapping a path to understanding: Supporting the comprehension of narrative text for students with learning disabilities and typically developing peers (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo).

35. Huang, C. T., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Effects of online reciprocal teaching on reading strategies, comprehension, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 381-407. doi:10.1177/0735633115571924 [DOI:10.1177/0735633115571924]

36. Khurshid, F., Qasmi, F. N., & Ashraf, N. (2012). The relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and their perceived job performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(10), 204-223.

37. Kirby, J. R. (2007). Reading comprehension: Its nature and development. In Encyclopedia of language and literacy, development. Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.

38. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524841]

39. Kodan, H., & Akyol, H. (2018). Effects of choral, repeated and assisted reading strategies on reading and reading comprehension skills of poor readers. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 43(193). doi:10.15390/EB.2018.7385 [DOI:10.15390/EB.2018.7385]

40. Kyo, O. Y. (2022). The growth trajectories of L2 self-efficacy and its effects on L2 learning: Using a curve-of-factors model. Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 147-167. [DOI:10.1093/applin/amab005]

41. Lehtonen, M. (2000). Reading, literacy, and education. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(3). [DOI:10.7771/1481-4374.2240]

42. Lenz, K. (2005). An introduction to reading comprehension. University of Kansas.

43. Li, Y., & Wang, C. (2010). An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 12(2), 144-162.

44. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249]

45. Morrow, L. M., & Gambrell, L. B. (2019). Best practices in literary instruction (6th ed), New York: Guilford Press.

46. Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194-209. [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763]

47. Naseri, M. (2012). The relationship between reading self-efficacy beliefs, reading strategy use and reading comprehension level of Iranian EFL learners. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 64-75. doi: 10.5430/wje.v2n2p64 [DOI:10.5430/wje.v2n2p64]

48. Nejati, R. (2024). The place of self-efficacy and self-regulation in reading comprehension in online classes. IJREE, 9(2), 90-104. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-927-en.html

49. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

50. Perfetti, C. A., Wlotko, E. W., & Hart, L. A. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1281. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1281 [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1281]

51. Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60-73. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n11p60 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v5n11p60]

52. Shang, H. F. (2007). Reading strategy training for the development of EFL reading comprehension. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (ROC-TEFL) 424-442, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.

53. Shang, H. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 12(2), 18-42.

54. Shikano, M., (2013). A quantitative survey on metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in English by Japanese university students. International Education Center Journal, 14, 11-24.

55. Sloat,Z., Beswick, J. F., & Williams, J. W. (2007). Using early literacy monitoring to prevent reading failure. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(7). doi:10.1177/003172170708800711 [DOI:10.1177/003172170708800711]

56. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135-147. [DOI:10.1080/00461520.2013.794676]