Enhancing EFL Learning Through Concordancing: A Quasi-Experimental Study on EFL Learners’ Collocational Competence and Retention, Motivation, and Autonomy

Karbakhsh Ravari, Akram; Nakhaee Ravari, Soheila; Rabani, Kamran

Volume 10, Issue 4 (12-2025) IJREE 2025, 10(4): 54-80 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Karbakhsh Ravari A, Nakhaee Ravari S, Rabani K. (2025). Enhancing EFL Learning Through Concordancing: A Quasi-Experimental Study on EFL Learners’ Collocational Competence and Retention, Motivation, and Autonomy. IJREE. 10(4),
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-1013-en.html

Enhancing EFL Learning Through Concordancing: A Quasi-Experimental Study on EFL Learners’ Collocational Competence and Retention, Motivation, and Autonomy

Akram Karbakhsh Ravari ^*

, Soheila Nakhaee Ravari

, Kamran Rabani

Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

Abstract: (56 Views)

Objective: Enhancing collocational competence, alongside improving learner motivation and autonomy, is a cornerstone of effective EFL instruction. Despite the well-documented affordances of corpus-based tools, particularly concordancers, in supporting various aspects of language development, their integration into mainstream language pedagogy is surprisingly limited. In response to this pedagogical oversight, the present study explores the efficacy of the concordancing software AntConc in advancing Iranian EFL learners’ development of collocations, long-term retention, self-directed learning, and motivational engagement.
Methods: Sixty intermediate-level learners were employed and then assigned to either a control or experimental group. Over a five-week intervention, participants in the experimental group engaged in practical corpus analysis using AntConc, working directly with authentic English language data. In contrast, the control group followed a traditional, teacher-centered instructional model. To capture the intervention’s impact, the study employed a combination of pre-tests, post-tests, delayed post-tests, and self-report questionnaires.
Results: The findings revealed significant developments in all measured domains for the experimental group, as confirmed by t-tests, mixed-design ANOVA, and Mann–Whitney U tests.
Conclusion: The findings indicated that the use of concordancing was more effective than conventional approaches in enhancing learners' knowledge and long-term recall of collocations. Furthermore, it contributed to increased motivation and autonomy by fostering a more engaged, discovery-oriented approach to learning.

Keywords: Autonomy, Collocational Competence, Concordancing, EFL Learners, Motivation, Retention

Full-Text [PDF 741 kb] (16 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References

1. Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2020). Collaborative dialogue: Opportunities and challenges in vocabulary acquisition and retention of threshold EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(2), 133-160. [DOI:10.1515/iral-2017-0175]

2. Akhter, S., & Nordin, N. R. M. (2022). Exploring the role of collocation in creative writing among Pakistani learners at secondary level: A corpus-based study. World Journal of English Language, 12(2), 382. [DOI:10.5430/wjel.v12n2p382]

3. Al Ghazali, F. (2015). Reinforcing students’ collocational competence in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual & Multilingual Teachers of English, 3(02), 105-116. [DOI:10.12785/ijbmte/030205]

4. Alagözlü, N. (2017). Learner autonomy and concordancers. Başkent University Journal of Education, 1(1), 64-71.

5. Alexander, M., & Dallachy, F. (2020). Lexis. In S. Adolphs, & D. Knight (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (pp. 164-184). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781003031758-10]

6. Almusharraf, N. (2018). English as a foreign language learner autonomy in vocabulary development: Variation in student autonomy levels and teacher support. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 159-177. [DOI:10.1108/jrit-09-2018-0022]

7. Alsahafi, M. (2022). Corpora and concordancing in second language vocabulary learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(12), 2651-2657. [DOI:10.17507/tpls.1212.23]

8. Anthony, L. (2005, March). AntConc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit. In IWLeL 2004: An interactive workshop on language e-learning (pp. 7-13). Waseda University. [DOI:10.1109/ipcc.2005.1494244]

9. Anthony, L. (2022). What can corpus software do?. In A. O'Keeffe, & M. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 103-125). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780367076399-9]

10. Anthony, L. (2024). Addressing the challenges of data-driven learning through Corpus tool design: In conversation with Laurence Anthony. In P. Crosthwaite (Ed.), Corpora for language learning (pp. 9-24). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781003413301-2]

11. Argyroulis, V. (2022). Investigating student motivation in the use of corpus concordancing in ESP learning at university level. ESP Today, 10(1), 71-98. [DOI:10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.4]

12. Basal, A. (2017). Learning collocations: Effects of online tools on teaching English adjective‐noun collocations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 342-356. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.12562]

13. Behzadian, K. (2016). The effect of input enhancement and concordance-based activities on Iranian EFL learners' acquisition and retention of phrasal verbs. Michigan Academician, 44(1), 29-50. [DOI:10.7245/0026-2005-44.1.29]

14. Bjork, R. A., & Kroll, J. F. (2015). Desirable difficulties in vocabulary learning. The American journal of psychology, 128(2), 241-252. [DOI:10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0241]

15. Boonraksa, T., & Naisena, S. (2022). A study on English collocation errors of Thai EFL students. English language teaching, 15(1), 164-177. [DOI:10.5539/elt.v15n1p164]

16. Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 67(2), 348-393. [DOI:10.1111/lang.12224]

17. Bui, T. L. (2021). The role of collocations in the English teaching and learning. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 99-109. https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/26

18. Çalışkan, G., & Gönen, S. İ. K. (2018). Training teachers on corpus-based language pedagogy: Perceptions on using concordance lines in vocabulary instruction. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 190-210.

19. Chan, T. P., & Liou, H. C. (2005). Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students' learning of verb–noun collocations. Computer assisted language learning, 18(3), 231-251. [DOI:10.1080/09588220500185769]

20. Cheng, Y. H. (2021). EFL college students’ concordancing for error correction. English Teaching & Learning, 45(4), 431-460. [DOI:10.1007/s42321-021-00075-5]

21. Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (2022). Autonomy of English language learners: A scoping review of research and practice. Language Teaching Research, 29(2), 607-632. [DOI:10.1177/13621688221075812]

22. Collentine, J. (2000). Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided by user behaviour tracking technologies. Language Learning & Technology, 3(2) 44-57.

23. Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684. [DOI:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x]

24. Crosthwaite, P. (2024). Corpora for language learning. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781003413301]

25. Daskalovska, N. (2015). Corpus-based versus traditional learning of collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(2), 130-144. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2013.803982]

26. Davis, B., & Russell-Pinson, L. (2004). Concordancing and corpora for K-12 teachers: Project MORE. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics (pp. 147-169). Brill. [DOI:10.1163/9789004333772_009]

27. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What's the difference?. Language teaching, 56(1), 29-40. [DOI:10.1017/s0261444821000057]

28. Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780429485893]

29. Estaji, M., & Montazeri, M. R. (2022). The representation of collocational patterns and their differentiating power in the speaking performance of Iranian IELTS test-takers. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 827927. [DOI:10.3389/feduc.2022.827927]

30. Evert, S. (2009). Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics. An international handbook, 2, 1212-1248. [DOI:10.1515/9783110213881.2.1212]

31. Farrokh, P. (2012). Raising awareness of collocation in ESL/EFL classrooms. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(3), 55-74. [DOI:10.5296/jse.v2i3.1615]

32. Flowerdew, L. (2015). Data-driven learning and language learning theories. In A. Leńko-Szymańska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp. 15-36). [DOI:10.1075/scl.69.02flo]

33. Gillings, M., & Mautner, G. (2024). Concordancing for CADS: Practical challenges and theoretical implications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 29(1), 34–58. [DOI:10.1075/ijcl.21168.gil]

34. Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2010). How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching?. In A. O'Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 359-370). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203856949-26]

35. Golabi, N. (2022). The effect of concordancing based teaching on student's vocabulary retention. Journal of Research in Techno-based Language Education, 2(1), 25-32.

36. Gries, S. Th. (2009). What is Corpus Linguistics? Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1225–1241. [DOI:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00149.x]

37. Hemmati, M. R., & Aziz Malayeri, F. (2022). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of obstacles to implementing student-centered learning: a mixed-methods study. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 10(40), 133-152. [DOI:10.30495/jfl.2022.686698]

38. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.

39. Hua, T. K., & Azmi, N. A. (2021). Collocational competence as a measure of ESL/EFL competency: A scoping review. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 27(1), 115–128. [DOI:10.17576/3l-2021-2701-09]

40. Jalilifar, A., Mehrabi, K., & Mousavinia, S. R. (2014). The effect of concordance enriched instruction on the vocabulary learning and retention of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 742-746. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.476]

41. Jeaco, S. (2017). Helping language learners get started with concordancing. TESOL International Journal, 12(1), 91-110.

42. Karpenko-Seccombe, T. (2018). Practical concordancing for upper-intermediate and advanced academic writing: Ready-to-use teaching and learning materials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 135-141. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2018.10.001]

43. Khan, R., Ali, A., & Alourani, A. (2022). Investigating learners' experience of autonomous learning in E-learning context. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(8), 4-17. [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v17i08.29885]

44. Khonamri, F., Ahmadi, F., Pavlikova, M., & Petrikovicova, L. (2020). The effect of awareness raising and explicit collocation instruction on writing fluency of EFL learners. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(4), 786-806. [DOI:10.13187/ejced.2020.4.786]

45. Kulakow, S. (2020). How autonomy support mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and approaches to learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(1), 13-25. [DOI:10.1080/00220671.2019.1709402]

46. Little, D. (2022). Language learner autonomy: Rethinking language teaching. Language Teaching, 55(1), 64-73. [DOI:10.1017/s0261444820000488]

47. Mahmoud, A. (2005). Collocation errors made by Arab learners of English. Asian EFL journal, 5(2), 117-126.

48. Masrai, A. (2023). Lexical knowledge and L2 general language proficiency: Collocational competence and vocabulary size as determinants of lexical knowledge. Cognitive Processing, 24(2), 289-300. [DOI:10.1007/s10339-022-01120-2]

49. Mohammadi, V., & Mohit, N. (2021). student and teacher attitude toward using concordancing in learning and teaching preposition collocations: Issues and options. Journal of Language Horizons, 5(2), 139-166. [DOI:10.22051/lghor.2020.31656.1316]

50. Nation, P., & Meara, P. (2019). 3 Vocabulary. In An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 35–54). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780429424465-3]

51. O’Keeffe, A. (2021). Data-driven learning, theories of learning and second language acquisition. In P. Pérez-Paredes & G. Mark (Eds.), Beyond concordance lines: Corpora in language education, 35-56. [DOI:10.1075/scl.102.02oke]

52. O'dell, F., & McCarthy, M. (2017). English collocations in use: Intermediate(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

53. Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 113-138. [DOI:10.1177/1362168814568131]

54. Phoocharoensil, S. (2011). Collocational errors in EFL learners’ interlanguage. Journal of education and practice, 2(3), 103-120.

55. Poole, R. (2012). Concordance-based glosses for academic vocabulary acquisition. Calico Journal, 29(4), 679-693. [DOI:10.11139/cj.29.4.679-693]

56. Pustejovsky, J., & Stubbs, A. (2012). Natural language annotation for machine learning: A guide to corpus-building for applications. O'Reilly Media, Inc.

57. Qader, D. S. (2018). The role of teaching lexical collocations in raising EFL learnersspeaking fluency (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).

58. Quan, Z., Grant, L., & Hocking, D. (2024). Comparing concordances of language patterns and words by ESL intermediate learners: A preliminary experiment with two mobile concordancers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5-6), 1421-1447. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2022.2081581]

59. Rets, I. (2017). Vocabulary retention and concordance-based learning in L3 acquisition. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 313-324. [DOI:10.32601/ejal.461029]

60. Rezaee, A. A., Marefat, H., & Saeedakhtar, A. (2014). Symmetrical and asymmetrical scaffolding of L2 collocations in the context of concordancing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 532-549. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2014.889712]

61. Römer, U. (2011). Corpus research applications in second language teaching. Annual review of applied linguistics, 31, 205-225. [DOI:10.1017/s0267190511000055]

62. Saeed, M. A. (2021). Learner autonomy: Learners’ perceptions on strategies to achieve autonomy in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(3), 150-158. [DOI:10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.3.17]

63. Saito, K., & Liu, Y. (2021). Roles of collocation in L2 oral proficiency revisited: Different tasks, L1 vs. L2 raters, and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal analyses. Second Language Research, 38(3), 531-554. [DOI:10.1177/0267658320988055]

64. Scharle, A. and Szabo, A. (2000) Learner autonomy: A Guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge University Press.

65. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. [DOI:10.1093/applin/11.2.129]

66. Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge university press.

67. Seven, M. A. (2020). Motivation in language learning and teaching. African Educational Research Journal, 8, 62-71.

68. Singh, R. (2018). Exploring the utilization of technology in teaching English: Practices and impediments. Journal of NELTA, 23(1-2), 153-168. [DOI:10.3126/nelta.v23i1-2.23360]

69. Sprenger, M. (2018). How to teach so students remember. ASCD.

70. Sun, W., & Park, E. (2023). EFL learners’ collocation acquisition and learning in corpus-based instruction: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(17), Article 13242. [DOI:10.3390/su151713242]

71. Sun, Y. C., & Wang, L. Y. (2003). Concordancers in the EFL classroom: Cognitive approaches and collocation difficulty. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 83-94. [DOI:10.1076/call.16.1.83.15528]

72. Szudarski, P. (2017). Learning and teaching L2 collocations: Insights from research. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 205-216. [DOI:10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1280]

73. Szudarski, P. (2023). Collocations, corpora and language learning. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/9781108992602]

74. Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Multilingual Matters. [DOI:10.21832/9781847691293-005]

75. Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered. The internet TESL journal, 6(11), 37-48.

76. Thurston, J., & Candlin, C. N. (1998). Concordancing and the teaching of the vocabulary of academic English. English for specific purposes, 17(3), 267-280. [DOI:10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00013-6]

77. Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.

78. Woodrow, L. (2016). Motivation in language learning. In R. Breeze, & C. Sancho Guinda (Eds.), Essential competencies for English-medium university teaching, 235-248. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-40956-6_16]

79. Wulff, S., & Baker, P. (2021). Analyzing concordances. In M. Paquot, & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 161-179). Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_8]

80. Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. A. N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. Tesol Quarterly, 44(4), 647-668. [DOI:10.5054/tq.2010.235998]

81. Yılmaz, E., & Soruç, A. (2015). The use of concordance for teaching vocabulary: A data-driven learning approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2626-2630. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.400]

82. Yoon, C. (2011). Concordancing in L2 writing class: An overview of research and issues. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 130-139. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.003]

83. Zaabalawi, R. S., & Gould, A. M. (2017). English collocations: A novel approach to teaching the language's last bastion. Ampersand, 4, 21-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.amper.2017.03.002]

84. Zaki, M. (2020). Self‐correction through corpus‐based tasks: Improving writing skills of Arabic learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-210. [DOI:10.1111/ijal.12312]

85. Zare, J., Karimpour, S., & Aqajani Delavar, K. (2022). The impact of concordancing on English learners’ foreign language anxiety and enjoyment: An application of data-driven learning. System, 109, Article 102891. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2022.102891]

86. Zare, J., Karimpour, S., & Aqajani Delavar, K. (2021). Classroom concordancing and English academic lecture comprehension: An implication of data-driven learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5-6), 885-905. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2021.1953081]

87. Zhang, L. X., & Li, X. X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4(1), 15-23.

88. Zohrabi, M., Torabi, M. A., & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student-centered learning: English language in Iran. English language and literature studies, 2(3), 18. [DOI:10.5539/ells.v2n3p18]