Volume 4, Issue 1 (3-2019)                   IJREE 2019, 4(1): 47-68 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Arianmanesh M, Khani R. A Comparative Study of Actual and Perceived Academic Competence of Iranian EAP Postgraduate Students . IJREE. 2019; 4 (1)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-137-en.html
Department of English Language and Literature, Ilam University, Iran
Abstract:   (631 Views)
Academic writing is a major concern for many university students. Despite extensive literature on students’ academic writing, little attention has been focused on students’ writing experience and practice in higher education. To fill this gap, the present study compared actual and perceived academic writing competence of postgraduate students who were enrolled in English for Academic Purposes (EAP, hereafter) courses. First, measures of actual and perceived academic writing competence were developed and validated in Phase 1, using a separate sample of EAP postgraduate students (n = 391) in Ilam province, Iran. Phase 2 examined postgraduate students’ academic writing competence perceptions and the ways through which their perceptions might have differed from their actual academic performance. Then the developed measures of actual and perceived academic writing competence, which exhibited acceptable reliability and good model-data fit, were distributed among a sample of 210 EAP postgraduate students from nine different academic fields. The results of data analysis revealed significant differences in perceptions and actual academic practices of students across different academic fields of study.

 

 
Full-Text [PDF 659 kb]   (100 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |

References
1. Alavi, S., & Tahririan, M. H. (1996). EFL learners' proficiency and their performance on GPE and ESP collocations. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 23-41.
2. Al-Badwawi, H. S. Q. (2011). The perceptions and practices of first-year students' academic writing at the Colleges of Applied Sciences in Oman. The University of Leeds. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/2390
3. Atai, M. R. (2000). ESP revisited: a reappraisal study of discipline-based EAP programs in Iran. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
4. Badley, G. (2009). Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(2), 209-219. doi: 10.1080/13562510902757294 [DOI:10.1080/13562510902757294]
5. Bardi, M. (2015). Learning the practice of scholarly publication in English: A Romanian perspective. Online Journal, 37(2), 98-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.002]
6. Belcher, D. D. (2007). Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001]
7. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-251. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6cn677bx [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238] [PMID]
8. Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2014). English is my default academic language: Voice from LSP scholars publishing in a multilingual journal. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13(2), 65-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.10.010]
9. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316. doi: 10.1177/0049124189017003004 [DOI:10.1177/0049124189017003004]
10. Cai, L. J. (2013). Students' perceptions of academic writing: A needs analysis of EAP in China. Language Education in Asia, 4(1), 5-22. [DOI:10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I1/A2/Cai]
11. Carrio-Pastor, M., & Mestre-Mestre, E. (2014). Lexical errors in second language scientific writing: Some conceptual implications. International journal of English studies, 14(1), 21-45. doi: [DOI:10.6018/ijes/14/1/154361]
12. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage publications.
13. Dőrnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Constructing, administering, and processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005]
15. Fazel, I. (2013). Writing for journal publication: An overview of NNES challenges and strategies. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 95-114.
16. Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 243-264. [DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80116-7]
17. Gea-Valor, M. L., Rey-Rocha, J., & Moreno, I. A. (2014). Publishing research in an international context: An analysis of Spanish scholars' academic writing needs in the social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 36(2), 47-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2014.05.001]
18. Gosden, H. (1992). Research writing and NNSs: From the editors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), 123-139. [DOI:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90012-E]
19. Halliday, M. A. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
20. Halliday, M. A. (1994). Functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
21. Hanauer, I. D., & Englander, K. (2011). Quantifying the burden of writing research articles in a second language: Data from Mexican scientists. Written Communication, 27(3), 1-14. doi: 10.1177/0741088311420056 [DOI:10.1177/0741088311420056]
22. Hinkel, E. (2003). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781410609427]
23. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage Publications.
24. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://www.sid.ir/En/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=98854 [DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118]
25. Jalongo, M. R. (2013). Getting on the conference program and writing a practical article: Templates for success. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(1), 13-23. [DOI:10.1007/s10643-012-0533-x]
26. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
27. Khany, R., & Tarlani-Aliabadi, H. (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers' and students' perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21(2), 72-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.002]
28. Kline, R. B. (2000). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
29. Lee, S. C. N., & Tajino, A. (2008). Understanding students' perceptions of difficulty with academic writing for teacher development: A case study of the university of Tokyo writing program. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13(2), 42-55.
30. Li, Y. (2006). A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(4), 456-478. [DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.002]
31. Maher, A. M., Feldon, F. D., Timmerman, E. B., & Chao, J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 699-711. [DOI:10.1080/07294360.2013.863850]
32. Martin, P., Rey-Rocha, J., Burgess, S., & Moreno, I. A. (2014). Publishing research in English-language journals: Attitudes, strategies, and difficulties of multilingual scholars of medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16(1), 57-67. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.001]
33. Mazdayasna, G., & Tahririan, M. H. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 277-289. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.008]
34. Mirahayuni, N. K. (2002). Investigating textual structure in native and non-native English Research articles: Strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. University of New South Wales.
35. Moreno, A., Rey-Rocha, J., Burgess, S., Lopez-Navarro, I., & Sachdev, I. (2012). Spanish researchers' perceived difficulty writing research articles for English- medium journal: The impact of proficiency in English versus publication experience. Iberica, 24(3), 157-184.
36. Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32(1), 81-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.05.001]
37. Perez-Llantada, C., Plo, R., & Ferguson, R. G. (2011). You don't say what you know, only what you can: The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 18-30. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2010.05.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2010.05.001]
38. Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A Confirmatory factor analysis. MIS quarterly, 17(4) 517-525. doi: 10.2307/249590 https://www.jstor.org/stable/249590 [DOI:10.2307/249590]
39. Shaw, P., & Liu, E. T. K. (1998). What develops in the development of second-language writing? Applied linguistics, 19(2), 225-254. [DOI:10.1093/applin/19.2.225]
40. Tahririan, M. H. (1987). ESP, yes, but for what learners. IAPE, Esfahan, 3.
41. Wilkinson, A. (2015). The rules of the game: A short guide for PhD students and new academics on publishing in academic journals. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 99-107. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.978350 [DOI:10.1080/14703297.2014.978350]
42. Zhang, Z. (2011). A nested model of academic writing approaches: Chinese international graduate students' views of English academic writing. Language and Literacy, 13(1), 39-59. doi: [DOI:10.20360/G27G6R]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb