Volume 4, Issue 3 (9-2019)                   IJREE 2019, 4(3): 55-69 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghalani L, Pahlavani P. Iranian EFL Learners’ Social Intelligence (SI) and Willingness to Communicate (WTC): The Relationship and Difference across Gender. IJREE. 2019; 4 (3)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-217-en.html
Department of English, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract:   (593 Views)
Nowadays, English has become an international language and is used for communication and interaction among different countries and cultures across the world. So, the ability to communicate in a comprehensive way is one of the major goals of any second language educational setting. The aims of the present research were to investigate the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ social intelligence (SI) and their willingness to communicate (WTC) across gender, as well as to find out any possible difference between male and female learners in SI and their WTC relationship. To this end, 240 male and female EFL learners from different institutions were selected as the participants of the study with different age ranges based on convenient sampling. Then two standardized questionnaires, i.e., SI and WTC, were administered for all participants to answer. After collecting the required data and its analysis, the findings revealed a positive and significant correlation between male and female SI and their WTC. In addition, further statistical analysis using  formula showed no difference between learners’ SI and WTC relationship across gender. The findings of the present research could be applicable for EFL learners, teachers, and material developers.
 
Keywords:

 
Full-Text [PDF 908 kb]   (76 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Alemi, M., Daftarifard, P., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2011). The Impact of language anxiety and language proficiency on WTC in EFL context. Cross-cultural Communication, 7(3), 150-166. doi: 10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110703.152
2. Aristu, A. L., Tello, F. P. H., Orttiz, M. A., & Gandarn, M. (2008). The structure of Bryant's empathy index for children: A croo-validation study. Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 670-677. [DOI:10.1017/S1138741600004674]
3. Al Murtadha, M. (2018). Enhancing EFL learners' willingness to communicate with visualization and goal setting activities. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 133-158. [DOI:10.1002/tesq.474]
4. Aubrey, S. C. (2010). Influences on Japanese students' willingness to communicate across three different sized EFL classes. Retrieved from https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/2239/thesis/influences-on-japanese-students-willingness-to-communicate-across-three-different-sized-efl-classes/#squelch-taas-tab-content-0-3
5. Barjastehe, H., & Vaseghi, R., & Naessi, S. (2011). Iranian EFL learners' willingness to communicate across different context- and receiver-types. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 47-54. doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n5p33 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v9n5p33]
6. Beheshtifar, M., & Roasaei, F. (2012). Role of social intelligence in organizational leadership, European Journal of Social Sciences, 28(2), 200-206. Available at http://flexmanager.ir/downloads/EJSS_28_2_03.pdf
7. Bennett, B. S. (2015). Social intelligence of undergraduates enrolled in traditional vs. distance higher education learning programs. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f254/27ec37d73a182ec7bc874cd238ac5960ac9e.pdf
8. Brown, L. T., & Anthony, R. G. (1990). Continuing the search for social intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(5), 463-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90059-Z [DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90059-Z]
9. Chesnokova, O. (2005). Cunning and social intelligence in children. www.lancs.ac.uk
10. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in language acquisition. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9781410613349 [DOI:10.4324/9781410613349] [PMID]
11. Ebrahimpour, H., Zahed, A., & Elyasi, A. (2013). The study of relationship between social intelligence and organizational performance. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 2(1), 4-13. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9297/4df6ece65e34ad8c440eec4e9e0b1a892532.pdf [DOI:10.33844/ijol.2013.60352]
12. Ford, M. E., & Tisak, M. S. (1983). A further search for social intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 196-206. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035988 [DOI:10.1037/h0035988]
13. Gnanadevan, R. (2007). Social intelligence of higher secondary students in relation to their socio-economic status. Journal of Community Guidance and Research, 24(3), 340-346. Available at http://www.mierjs.in/ojs/index.php/mjestp/article/viewFile/6/5
14. Gholami, L. (2015). Willingness to communicate and its relationship with emotional intelligence and gender differences. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Online, 52, 87-94. [DOI:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.52.87]
15. Gkonou, C., & Mercer, S. (2017). Understanding emotional and social intelligence among English language teachers. Discussion Paper. British Council ELT Research Papers. Retrieved from https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/g211_eltra_gkonou_and_mercer_paper_final_web.pdf
16. Goddard, W., & Melville, S. (2004). Research methodology: An introduction (2nd edition). NY: Blackwell Publishing.
17. Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 93-102. Available at https://icenamor.github.io/files/What-makes-a-leader.pdf
18. Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. London: Arrow Books. Available at https://epdf.pub/social-intelligence-the-new-science-of-human-relationships.html
19. Ketabdar, Z., Yazdani, S., & Yarahmadi, M. (2014). The relationship between emotional intelligence and willingness to communicate among Iranian EFL Learners. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 3(3), 637-650. Available at http://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/1327/pdf
20. Kim, K. (2012). L2 phone-based interaction (PBI) and development of communicative competence: A case study of an adult's English learning in EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 14, 99-177. Available at https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-journals/l2-phone-based-interaction-pbi-and-development-of-communicative-competence-a-case-study-of-an-adults-english-learning-in-efl-context/#squelch-taas-tab-content-0-3
21. Kocoglu, Z. (1997). The role of gender on communication strategy use. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED409725.pdf
22. Lee, J. S. (2019). EFL students' views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-21.doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509 [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509]
23. Machida, S. (2001). Anxiety in Japanese-language class oral examinations. Sekai no Nihongo Kyoiku, 11, 115-138.
24. MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135-142. [DOI:10.1080/08824099409359951]
25. MacIntyre P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language꞉ Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal 91(4) 564-576. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x https://www.jstor.org/stable/4626086 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x [DOI:stable/4626086]
26. MacIntyre P. D. Baker S. C. Clement R.  Conrod S. (2001). Willingness to communicate social supportand language learning orientation of immersion students. SSLA 23(3) 369-388. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.542.9753&rep=rep1&type=pdf doi: 10.1017/S0272263101003035 [DOI:10.1017/S0272263101003035]
27. MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.589 [DOI:10.3138/cmlr.59.4.589]
28. MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001 [DOI:10.1177/0261927X960151001]
29. MacIntyre P. D. Dornyei Z. Clement R.  Noels K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in L2꞉ A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal 82(24), 545-562.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x]
30. Marlowe, H. A. (1986). Social intelligence: Evidence for multi dimensionality and construct independence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.52 [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.52]
31. Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327-365. [DOI:10.3102/0034654308325583]
32. McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association (71st, Denver, CO, November 7-10, 1985).
33. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In McCroskey JC, Daly JA (eds) Personality and interpersonal communication (pp.129-156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
34. McCroskey J. C.,  Richmond V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate differing cultural perspectives. The Southern Communication Journal 56(1) 72-76. [DOI:10.1080/10417949009372817]
35. Meshkat, M., & Nejati, R. (2017). Does emotional intelligence depend on gender? A study on undergraduate English majors of three Iranian universities. Sage Open, 7(3). Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244017725796 [DOI:10.1177/2158244017725796]
36. Naghavi, F., & Redzuan, M. (2011). The relationship between gender and emotional intelligence. World Applied Sciences Journal 15(4), 555-561. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/63c3/184d107e804db1b7701a752f6f27d11b2c56.pdf
37. Nwkah, N. G., & Ahiauzu, A. L. (2009). Emotional intelligence and marketing effectives. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(7), 867-881. doi: 10.1108/02634500911000199 [DOI:10.1108/02634500911000199]
38. Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 269-275. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.009]
39. Pratisang, M., Hanafi, Z., & Walter. T. (2015). The relationship among emotional intelligence, social intelligence and learning behavior. Asian Social Science, 11(13), 98-107. doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n13p98 [DOI:10.5539/ass.v11n13p98]
40. Rahbar, B., Suzani, M., & Sajadi, Z. (2016). The relationship between emotional intelligence and willingness to communicate among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2(3), 10-17. Available at http://jlttp.ir/files/uploads/2016/10/2.2-Rahbar-et-al..pdf
41. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman Pearson Education. [DOI:10.4324/9781315833835]
42. Rosenfeld, L.W., & Berko, R. M. (1990).Communicating with competency. NY: Foresman & Company.
43. Saxena S., & Jain, K. R. (2009). Social intelligence of undergraduate students in relation to their gender and subject stream. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(1), 1-4. [DOI:10.9790/7388-0110104]
44. Silvera, D. H., Martinussen, M., & Dahl, T. I. (2001). The Tromso social intelligence scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 313-319. [DOI:10.1111/1467-9450.00242] [PMID]
45. Strevens, P. (1992). English as an international language. In B. B. Kachru (Eds.), The other tongue: English across cultures (pp. 27-47). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. doi: 10.2307/376966 [DOI:10.2307/376966]
46. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_394]
47. Tabatabaei, O., & Jamshidifar, M. (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence and willingness to communicate among EFL learners. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 90-99. [DOI:10.5296/ijele.v2i1.4650]
48. Vyrost, J., & Kyselova, M. (2006). Personality correlates of social intelligence. Studia Psychologica, 48(3), 207-212. Available at http://www.elis.sk/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage-ask.tpl&product_id=1166&category_id=39&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1
49. Wright, M. (1999). Influences on learner attitudes towards foreign language and culture. Educational Research, 41(2), 197-208. [DOI:10.1080/0013188990410207]
50. Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54- 66. [DOI:10.1111/1540-4781.00136]
51. Zarafshan, M., & Ardeshiri, M. (2012). The relationship between emotional intelligence, language learning strategies and English proficiency among Iranian EFL university students. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(3), 105-114. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a271/a136d491108e35a1e540b302d7b43e49bf3b.pdf
52. Zarrinabadi, N., & Tanbakooei, N. (2016).Willingness to communicate: Rise, development, and some future direction. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(1), 30-45. [DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12176]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb