Volume 8, Issue 4 (9-2023)                   IJREE 2023, 8(4): 81-99 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sabzalipour B, Shafiee S, Kolahdouzan M. Ethnographic Investigation of Academic Writing: Expectations and Practices in the MA TEFL Advanced Writing Course. IJREE 2023; 8 (4)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-885-en.html
1. Department of English, Rahman institute for higher education, Ramsar, Iran
Abstract:   (1012 Views)
The objectives of the present ethnography were three-fold: exploring the MA TEFL students' expectations of the Advanced Writing course taken as part of their coursework in the MA program, unearthing the actual classroom practices implemented, and eliciting any possible suggestions for its improvement. To this aim, stimulated recall and ethnographically-oriented qualitative research were used to interview nine MA students at IAU, Isfahan Branch and unravel their perspectives concerning the writing course they had passed. Non-participant observation was also used to triangulate the data and verify the students' responses regarding the expectations/problems of the course and the classroom practices besides cyclical data analysis to find the recurring patterns and themes in the data. Results showed the most serious problems were lack of enough writing practice during the course, limited class hours, and lack of feedback on students' writings. The prevalent classroom practices, on the other hand, were covering the APA writing style, teaching how to write the different sections of a research report, and working on essay writing during the first few sessions of the course. Finally, the top suggestions made by the students were adding practical writing activities to the course, having more writing courses, taking advantage of group work for students to monitor each other's work and provide peer feedback, and offering the course right before students take their thesis rather than in the first semester of the MA program. These findings can heighten the educator's awareness and contribute to a better understanding of students' needs/expectations regarding academic writing. Overall, by addressing the gap in understanding advanced EFL learners' expectations, this study can have practical implications that directly impact the teaching of writing. It can guide curriculum development, inform instructional approaches, enhance learner motivation and engagement, promote learner autonomy, and improve instructional materials, ultimately leading to more effective writing instruction and improved outcomes for advanced EFL learners.
 
Full-Text [PDF 837 kb]   (268 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. American Anthropological Association (2004). Statement on ethnography and institutional review boards. https://americananthro.org/about/policies/statement-on-ethnography-and-institutional-review-boards/
2. Barkaoui, K. (2007). Revision in second language writing: What teachers need to know. TESL Canada Journal, 25(1), 81-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v25i1.109 [DOI:10.18806/tesl.v25i1.109]
3. Chong, F. H. (2002). Children writing in English in the Singapore upper primary school: A case study of six 12-year-old students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University.
4. Chuenchaichon, Y. (2014). A review of EFL writing research studies in Thailand in the past 10 years. Journal of Humanities, 11(1), 13-30.
5. Cumming, A. (1995). Fostering writing expertise in ESL composition instruction: Modeling and evaluation. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 375-397). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
6. Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369-390. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9 [DOI:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9]
7. Felix, U., & Lawson, M. (2006). Evaluation of an integrated bridging course on academic writing for overseas postgraduate students. Higher Education Research & Development, 13(1), 59-69. doi: [DOI:10.1080/0729436940130106]
8. Foley, J. A. (2013). Developing academic writing in a business-oriented university. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 168-186. doi:10.17509/ijal.v2i2.163 [DOI:10.17509/ijal.v2i2.163]
9. Gabrielatos, C. (2002). EFL writing: Product and process. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234624105_EFL_Writing_Product_and_Process
10. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/Decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Phillis (eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies (pp. 117-127). Ney York, NY: Unwin Hyman.
11. Hammersley, M. (2006). Ethnography: problems and prospects. Ethnography and Education, 1(1), 3-14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42800693_Ethnography_Problems_and_prospects [DOI:10.1080/17457820500512697]
12. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
13. Hashemi, S. M. R. (2014). Understanding research in applied linguistics. Tehran: SAMT.
14. Heyl, B. S. (2001). Ethnographic interviewing. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 369-383). London: Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781848608337.n25]
15. Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29. [DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8]
16. Kroll, B. (1998). Assessing writing abilities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 219-240. doi:10.1017/S0267190500003561 [DOI:10.1017/S0267190500003561]
17. Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14(2), 171-196. [DOI:10.1163/156916283X00090]
18. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Larcombe, W., McCosker, A., & O'Loughlin, K. (2007). Supporting education PhD and DEd students to become confident academic writers: An evaluation of thesis writers' circles. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 4(1), 1-11. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=jutlp [DOI:10.53761/1.4.1.6]
20. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-72. [DOI:10.1080/03075079812331380364]
21. Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and "deep theorizing": Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388. [DOI:10.1177/0741088308319229]
22. Ma, L. P. F. (2019). Academic writing support through individual consultations: EAL doctoral student experiences and evaluation. J. Sec. Lang. Writ. 43, 72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.006 [DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.006]
23. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and Design. New York, NY: Routledge.
24. Matsuda, P. K. (1998). Situating ESL writing in a cross-disciplinary context. Written Communication, 15(1), 99-121. 4 [DOI:10.1177/074108839801500100]
25. Matsuda, P. K., Saenkhum, T., & Accardi, S. (2013). Writing teachers' perceptions of the presence and needs of second language writers: An institutional case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 68-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.10.001]
26. Mills, K. A. (2005). Deconstructing binary oppositions in literacy discourse and pedagogy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(1), 67-82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280244121_Deconstructing_Binary_Oppositions_in_Literacy_Discourse_and_Pedagogy
27. Nekooeian, A. A. (2013). Design, implementation, and evaluation of principles of writing biomedical research paper course. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 1(4), 113-118.
28. Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, L., & Nicholson, S. (2012). Doctoral writing in the visual and performing arts: Two ends of a continuum. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 989-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.562285 [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2011.562285]
29. Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
31. Rickard, C. M. (2009). Supporting academic publication: Evaluation of a writing course combined with writers' support group. Nurse Education Today, 29(5), 516-521. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.11.005]
32. Santoso, A. (2010). Scaffolding an EFL (English as a Foreign Language) 'Effective writing' class in a hybrid learning community. Doctoral dissertation. Queensland University of Technology.
33. Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing (11-23). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524551.005]
34. Sojoodizadeh, R., Ahangari, S., & Sheykhsaran, E. (2020). Evaluation of Tabriz medical students' expectations of learning English for specific purposes (ESP): A focus on gender and subject field. Research and Development in Medical Education, 9(1), 1-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342174404_Evaluation_of_Tabriz_medical_students%27_expectations_of_learning_English_for_specific_purposes_ESP_A_focus_on_gender_and_subject_field [DOI:10.34172/rdme.2020.005]
35. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
36. Suwannasom, T. (2001). A study on using restructuring strategies and abilities in English language expository writing of undergraduate English majors. Unpublished master's thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
37. Wang, X., & Yang, L. (2012). Problems and strategies in learning to write a thesis proposal: A study of six MA students in a TEFL program. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 324-41. https://docplayer.net/18370671-Problems-and-strategies-in-learning-to-write-a-thesis-proposal-a-study-of-six-m-a-students-in-a-tefl-program.html [DOI:10.1515/cjal-2012-0024]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb