Volume 3, Issue 1 (3-2018)                   IJREE 2018, 3(1): 59-67 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moslehi M, Rahimi D R. The Effect of Role-Play through Dialogues vs. Written Practice on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Knowledge of English Idioms. IJREE 2018; 3 (1)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-89-en.html
Department of English Language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
Abstract:   (9150 Views)
This study aimed to investigate the effect of role-play through dialogues vs. written practice on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ knowledge of English idioms. The question this study tried to answer is if role-play through dialogues vs. written practice has a significant effect on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ knowledge of English idioms. To find the answer to the question, 30 intermediate level students from Iranian institute were selected. They were both male and female. Intermediate level students who were dealt for the current study were selected because they were learning all skills of language at the same time, they were familiar with words, and their English proficiency was enough to speak English and understand the importance of speaking. The students were selected administrating OPT which divided into two groups, one experimental group (Role-Play through Dialogues) and one control group (Written Practice). The results of this study revealed that the experimental participants performed better on learning idiom.

Full-Text [PDF 391 kb]   (3658 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

1. Afshar, N., & Esmaeili, Z. (2017). The effect of role-play through dialogue vs. written practice on knowledge of English idioms. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 17(1), 40-46.
2. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Ekyckmans, J. (2004). Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning idioms. In P. Bogaards, & B. Laufer, (Ed.), Vocabulary in a second language: selection, acquisition and testing. Amesterdam and Philadelphia: John Brnjamins, 53-78. doi: 10.1075/lllt.10.07boe [DOI:10.1075/lllt.10.07boe]
3. Collis, H. (1994). 101 American English Idioms illustrated by Mario Risso. ‎Tehran: Hezaro Yekshab, ‎PE .6405 .C6055 1994
4. Charteris-black, J. (2002). Second language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English. Applied linguistics, 23(1), 104-133. [DOI:10.1093/applin/23.1.104]
5. Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oup.com/elt/catalogue/isbn/0-19-442153-...
6. Dell'Olio, J, M., & Donk, T. (2007). Modeling of teaching: Connecting student learning with standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Fraser, B., Rintell, E., & Walters. J. (1980). An approach to conducting research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research (pp. 75-91). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/026765839200800303
8. Glucksberg, S. (2001). On the fates of literal meanings. Paper presented at work-shop towards an experimental pragmatics. Lyons, France.
9. Hall, G. E., Quinn, L. F., & Gollnick, D. M. (2008). The joy of teaching: Making a difference in student learning. Boston, MA: Allyn& Bacon.
10. Holt, L. C., & Kysilka, M. (2006). Instructional patterns: Strategies for maximizing student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558. [DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00164]
12. Jones, K. (1982). Simulations in language teaching. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
14. Ladouse, G. P. (1987). Role play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Langer, J. A. (2002). Effective literacy instruction: Building successful reading and writing programs. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16. Larsson, E. (2004). Participatory education: What and why. In M. Montola & J. Stenros (Eds.), Beyond role and play: Tools, toys and theory for harnessing the imagination (pp. 243—247). Helsinki: Solmukohta. [PMID]
17. Liu, F., & Ding, Y. (2009). Role-play in English language teaching. Asian Social Science, 5(10), 140-143 doi: [DOI:10.5539/ass.v5n10p140]
18. Livingstone, C. (1983). Role play in language learning. Harlow, UK: Longman. [PMCID]
19. Moore, K. D. (2005). Effective instructional strategies: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
20. Nation, P. (Ed.). (1994). New ways in teaching vocabulary. Alexandria, VA: TESOL. [PMCID]
21. Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill. [PMCID]
22. Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261-276. com/doi/abs/10.1177/1046878192233001 [DOI:10.1177/1046878192233001]
23. Sadeghi, A. R. (2005). ESP in Iran: A transition from present state. In G. R. Kiany & M, Khayyamdar (Eds.), Proceedings of the first national ESP/EAP conference, 2, Tehran.
24. Scarcella, R., & Crookall, D. (1990). Simulation/gaming and language acquisition. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 223―230). New York: Newbury House. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263100009591]
25. Scott, W., & Ytreberg, L. (2000). Teaching English to children. New York: Longman.
26. Svinicki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2011). Teaching tips: Strategies research, and theory for college and university teachers (13thed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage.
27. Swain, M. (1996). Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research perspectives. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(4), 529-48.
28. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Van ments, T. (1983). Applied linguistics and the learning and teaching of foreign languages. New York: St: Martin's Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.04 [DOI:10.17507/jltr.0805.04]
30. Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25(2), 261-274. [DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00013-4]
31. Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1017/S0267190500000982]
32. Zarei, A. A., & Rahimi, N. (2012). Idioms. Etymology, contextual pragmatic clues, and lexical knowledge in focus. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies (IJALS), 6(2), 179-203. doi: 10.22111/ijals.2014.2193

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb