Volume 2, Issue 1 (3-2017)                   IJREE 2017, 2(1): 58-67 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shamsi M, Rahimy R. The Impact of L2 Semantic Tasks (L2 Collocation versus L2 Definition) on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Achievement. IJREE. 2017; 2 (1)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-30-en.html
Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon-Iran
Abstract:   (2323 Views)

This study investigated the relationship between teaching L2 semantic tasks (collocation vs. definition) in vocabulary achievement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. To this end, 60 students at intermediate level studying in the Simin Institute were selected from a total number of 100 participants based on their performance on Oxford Placement Test. After ensuring the criterion of homogeneity, they were randomly assigned to two experimental and one control group each comprising 20 participants. Before starting the treatment, a pretest was administered to find out learners’ vocabulary knowledge. Then the experimental groups were instructed to use collocation and definition in vocabulary learning for 5 sessions while the control group received no treatment. After the end of the treatment, the same pre-test was administered to all groups as a post-test. Analysis of the results of three paired sample T-test and a one way ANOVA showed that the experimental group that received collocation task outperformed the other two groups (control group and second experimental group) in the post-test. It was concluded that teaching collocation task had a positive effect on learners’ vocabulary knowledge.        

Full-Text [PDF 434 kb]   (834 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

1. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008). How Cognitive Linguistics Can Foster Effective Vocabulary Teaching. In Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S. (eds) Applications of Cognitive Linguistics: Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology (1st ed). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. [DOI:10.1515/9783110199161.1.1]
2. Brown, D. (1974). Advanced Vocabulary Teaching: The Problem of Collocation. RELC Journal, 5(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827400500201 [DOI:10.1177/003368828601700201]
3. Celce-Murcia, M., & Rosensweig, F. (1989). Teaching Vocabulary in the ESL Classroom. In Celce-Murcia, M., & McIntosh, L. (eds) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (1st ed). New York, Newbury House Publishers Inc.
4. Farghal, M., Obiedat, H. (1995). Collocations: A Neglected Variable in EFL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 33(4), 315-331. [DOI:10.1515/iral.1995.33.4.315]
5. Fernández, R. F., Prahlad, S. R. R., Rubtsova, E., & Sabitov, O. (2009). Collocations in the Vocabulary English Teaching as a Foreign Language. Acimed, 19(6), 1-5.
6. Fraser, C. A. (1999). Lexical Processing Strategy Use and Vocabulary Learning through Reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 225–241. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263199002041]
7. Haswell, R. H. (1991). Gaining Ground in College Writing: Tales of Development and Interpretation. Dallas, TX: Southern University Press. [PMID]
8. Jesa, M. (2008). Efficient English Teaching. New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation.
9. Mccarthy, M. (1992). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. McCrostie, J. (2007). Examining Learner Vocabulary Notebooks. ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal, 61(3), 246-255. [DOI:10.1093/elt/ccm032]
11. Morra, S., & Camba, R. (2009). Vocabulary Learning in Primary School Children: Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Components. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(2), 156-178. [DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.007] [PMID]
12. Nattinger, J., & DeCarrio, J. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Nation, P., Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary Size, Text Coverage, and Word Lists. InSchmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (eds) Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy (1st ed). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
14. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524759]
15. Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The Use of Collocations by Advanced Learners of English and Some Implications for Teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223-242. [DOI:10.1093/applin/24.2.223]
16. Rashtchi, & Rezvani. (2011). Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Do They Help Iranian EFL Learners to Overcome Vocabulary Learning Difficulties? Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch.
17. Richards, J. C. (1976). The Role of Vocabulary Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89. [DOI:10.2307/3585941]
18. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=
19. Thornbury, S. (2004). How to Teach Vocabulary. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. [PMCID]
20. Wallace, M. (1982). Teaching Vocabulary. London: Heinemann.
21. Waring, R. (2002). A Comparison of the Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Size of Some Second Language Learners. Appeared in Immaculate; the Occasional Paper at Notre Dame Seishin University. Retrieved from http//www1.harenet.ne.jp/~waring/papers/vocsize.html on 13 February 2008.
22. Zu, F. (2009). Using Lexical Approach to Teach Vocabulary. US-China Foreign Language, 7(8), 44-47.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2018 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb