Volume 2, Issue 3 (9-2017)                   IJREE 2017, 2(3): 67-77 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khodashenas M R, Rakhshi F. The Effect of Electronic Portfolio Assessment on the Writing Performance of Iranian EFL Learners. IJREE. 2017; 2 (3)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-61-en.html
Ph.D Candidate in Applied Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, E-Campus
Abstract:   (1582 Views)

The present study attempted to investigate the impact of electronic portfolio assessment on performance of Iranian EFL learners’ writing. To do so, 30 advanced EFL learners who participated in a TOEFL preparation course were selected as the participants of the study. After administrating a truncated version of TOEFL proficiency test, they were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The experimental group was given a treatment including electronic portfolio assessment, while the control group was given a placebo. To collect the required data, two instruments (a writing pre-test and a writing post-test) were administered to both groups during the experimentation. Subsequently, the learners’ scores were collected and the results were statistically analyzed. Inter-rater reliability, matched t-test, and independent t-test were calculated. The findings revealed that the participants of the experimental group outperformed those of the control group and thus it was concluded that electronic portfolio assessment can improve the writing ability and can be considered as a motivating assessment strategy

Full-Text [PDF 577 kb]   (843 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References
1. Abrami, P. C., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3), 1-15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21432/T2RK5K [DOI:10.21432/T2RK5K]
2. Ahn, J. (2004). Electronic portfolios: Blending technology, accountability & assessment. T.H.E. Journal, 31(9), 12. Retrieved September 8, 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/77087/.
3. Aly, M. M. (2002). The effect of using the writing workshop approach on developing student teachers composing skills. Proceedings of the 21th CDELT National Symposium on English Language Teaching: Meeting Challenges of ELT in the Arab World (pp. 131- 169). Ain Shams University, Egypt. [PMID]
4. Apple, M., & Shimo, E. (2004). Learners to teacher: portfolios, please! Perceptions of portfolio assessment in EFL classroom. Proceedings of JALT Pan-SIG Conference (pp. 53-58). Japan. [PMID]
5. Attwell, G. (2005). Recognizing learning: Educational and pedagogic issues in e-Portfolios. Paper presented at ePortfolio Conference. Cambridge, September 2005.
6. Barrett, H. C. (2000). Create your own electronic portfolio. Learning and Leading With Technology, 27(7), 14-21. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2003.11.002. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2003.11.002]
7. Barrett, H. C. (2006). Using electronic portfolios for formative/classroom-based assessment. Retrieved from: http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/ConnectedNewsletter.pdf.
8. Bisovsky, G., & Schaffert, S. (2009). Learning and teaching with E-Portfolios: Experiences in and challenges for adult education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4(1), 13-15. doi:10.3991/ijet.v4i1.822 [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v4i1.822]
9. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment principles and classroom practices. San Francisco: Longman. [DOI:10.1080/0969594042000304609]
10. Brown, J. D., & Bailey, K. M. (1984). A categorical instrument for scoring second language writing skills. Language Learning, 34(4), 21-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00350.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00350.x]
11. Cambridge, B. (2001). Electronic portfolios as knowledge builders. In B. L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D. P. Tompkins & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning (pp. 1-11). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
12. Canada, M. (2002). Assessing e-folios in the on-line class. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(91), 69-75. doi:10.1002/tl.68. [DOI:10.1002/tl.68]
13. Carless, D. (2006). Collaborative EFL teaching in primary schools. ELT Journal, 60(4), 328-335. [DOI:10.1093/elt/ccl023]
14. Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., Chou, P. N., & Chen, Y. H. (2011). Reliability and validity of Web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school's students taking computer course. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1306-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.014. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.014]
15. Collins, A. (1992). Portfolios for science education: Issues in purpose, structure, and authenticity. Science Education, 76(4), 451-463. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730760408. [DOI:10.1002/sce.3730760408]
16. Danielson, C., & Abrutyn L. (1997). Introduction of using portfolio in classroom. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from ASCD, Learn, Teach, Lead.
17. Deshler, D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Nair, M. (2007). Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers: A research based guide to instructional programs and practices. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. [PMCID]
18. Heath, M. (2005). Are you ready to go digital? The pros and cons of electronic portfolio development. Library Media Connection, 23(7), 66-70.
19. Hirvela, A., & Sweetland, Y. L. (2005). Two case studies of L2 writers' experiences across learning-directed portfolio contexts. Assessing Writing, 10(3), 192-213. [DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2005.07.001]
20. Khodashenas, M. R., Kishani Farahani, S. & Amouzegar, E. (2013). The effect of keeping portfolios on writing ability of advanced EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 4(2), 80-88. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.3.585-595. [DOI:10.4304/tpls.2.3.585-595]
21. Lorenzo, G., & Ittleson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI).
22. Love, T., & Cooper, T. (2004). Designing online information systems for portfolio-based assessment: Design criteria and heuristics. Journal of information technology education, 3, 65-81. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/20020 [DOI:10.28945/289]
23. Marefat, F. (2004). Portfolio revisited. IJAL, 7(2), 79-96.
24. Masaeli, N., & Chalak, A. (2016). The Effect of employing electronic portfolio on Iranian EFL learners' writing skill. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 746-751. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.15. [DOI:10.17507/jltr.0704.15]
25. Mason, L. H., Benedek-Wood, E., & Valasa, L. (2009). Teaching low-achieving students to self-regulate persuasive quick write responses. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(4), 302- 312. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.53.4.4. [DOI:10.1598/JAAL.53.4.4]
26. Mayer, D. K., & Tusin, L. F. (1999). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of portfolios: Process versus product. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(2), 131–139. [DOI:10.1177/002248719905000206]
27. Meshkat, M., & Goli, A. (2012). Effect of using e-portfolio on the writing proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. The Iranian EFL Journal, 8(5), 337-370.
28. Muslimi, F. (2015). The effect of using portfolio on the development of students' English business writing and their attitudes towards the course at Sana'a Community College. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(10), 414-423.
29. Mustafa, A. A. M. (2011). The impact of electronic assessment-driven instruction on preservice EFL teachers' quality teaching. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 10(1), 18-35.
30. Nunan, D. (2003). Second language teaching and learning. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle &Heinle Publishers. [PMCID]
31. Pierce, D., Kinsell, D., & Coggshall, V. (2011). Cracking the TOEFL IBT. New York: Random House, ©2011
32. Pourvandi Vangah, F., Jafarpur, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2016). Portfolio assessment and process writing: Its effect on EFL students' L2 writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(3), 224-246.doi: www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/viewFile/307/pdf307
33. Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511667190]
34. Scherba de Valenzuela, J. (2002). Defining portfolio assessment. doi: http://www.unm.edu/~devalenz/handouts/portfolio.html.
35. Steffe, L., & Gale J. (1995). Constructivism in education. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ. [PMID]
36. Sun, J. R. (2002). E-assessment: The design of assessment activities in technology enhanced and distance learning. University of Rio Grande.
37. Tierney, R. J., Soter, A., O'Flahavan, J. F., & McGinley, W. (1989). The effects of reading and writing upon thinking critically. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(2), 134-173. doi: 10.2307/747862. [DOI:10.2307/747862]
38. Wade, A., Abrami, P. C., & Sclater, J. (2005). An electronic portfolio to support learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). [DOI:10.21432/T2H30P]
39. Warschauer, M. (2007). Technology and writing. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 907-917). Springer US. [DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_60]
40. Weigle, C. S. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511732997]
41. Young, J. R. (2002). E-portfolios could give students a new sense of their accomplishments. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(26), 31-32.
42. Yurdabakan, I., & Erdogan, T. (2009). The effects of portfolio on assessment reading, listening and writing skills of secondary school prep class students. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(9), 526-538. doi: www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt2/sayi9pdf/yurdabakanirfan_erdogantolga.pdf

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Research in English Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb