Volume 8, Issue 4 (9-2023)
IJREE 2023, 8(4): 17-31 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Askari N. Relationship between Speed of Reading and Reading Comprehension Score in Undergraduate Students of EFLU: A Disquisition. IJREE 2023; 8 (4)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-802-en.html
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-802-en.html
English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India
Abstract: (1118 Views)
The present study is an attempt to find if there is a relationship between silent reading speed and reading comprehension score in undergraduate students a pre-requisite study before starting a research involving factors related to metacognition and the affective domain. The sample of the study consists of twenty-four undergraduate students pursuing various foreign languages such as French, Russian, Arabic, Japanese, and German. To assess the reading comprehension of the students, two passages with multiple choice questions were selected from a book designed to check and improve reading speed and reading comprehension. The students worked in pairs, keeping a record of time taken to read for their partner. The word count of the passage was divided by the student’s speed of reading to analyze the reading speed simultaneously the students answered the multiple choice questions given after the passage which was used to assess the comprehension level. The findings of the t-test revealed that there is a significant difference between the reading speed and reading comprehension scores and the Pearson’s correlation shows that there is a positive and moderate relationship between the two variables. Secondly, it revealed that there is a significant difference between male and female students with respect to their reading comprehension scores and reading speed. In both cases the female students performed better in comparison to the male students. Finally, it reveals that there is a significant difference between the students pursuing different languages at their undergraduate level with respect to their reading comprehension and reading speed. The results indicated that the students from Japan had the highest scores, followed by those from Germany, France, Arabic, Spanish, and Russian.
References
1. Abdelrahman, M. S. H. B., & Bsharah, M. S. (2014). The effect of speed reading strategies on developing reading comprehension among the 2nd secondary students in English language. English Language Teaching, 7(6), 168-174. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n6p168 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n6p168 [DOI:10.5539/elt.v7n6p168]
2. Bell, T. (2001). Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1-13. https://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/bell/index.html
3. Carver, R. P. (1982). Optimal rate of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(1), 56-58. [DOI:10.2307/747538]
4. Cutler, W. E. (1993). Triple your reading speed (3rd. Edition). Macmillan.
5. Durukan, E. (2020). Impact of speed reading training on reading speeds and comprehension skills of secondary school students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 15(2), 184-193. doi:10.18844/cjes.v15i2.4491 [DOI:10.18844/cjes.v15i2.4491]
6. Goodman, K. (2008). The reading first debacle. https://www.u.arizona.edu/~kgoodman/readingdeb.pdf
7. Iwahori, Y. (2008). Developing reading fluency: A study of extensive reading in EFL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(1), 70-91. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ791535.pdf
8. Kim, Y. S. G. (2015). Developmental, component-based Model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word-reading fluency, text-reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 50(4) 459-481. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43999135 [DOI:10.1002/rrq.107]
9. Krashan, S. (2002). Defending whole language: The limits of phonics instruction and the efficacy of whole language instruction. Reading Improvement, 39(1), 32-42. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/2002_defending_whole_language.pdf
10. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. A. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2 [DOI:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2]
11. Logan, G. D. (1997). TI: Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 123-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130203 [DOI:10.1080/1057356970130203]
12. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492-527. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492]
13. Morrice, E., Hughes, J., Stark, Z., Wittich, W., & Johnson, A. (2020). Validation of the international reading speed texts in a Canadian sample. Optometry and Vision Science. Research Gate. [DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001538]
14. Rasinski, T. V., Reutzel, D. R., Chard, D., & Thompson, S. L. (2011). Reading fluency. Handbook of reading research Volume IV. Routledge. Taylor & Francis. 286-319.
15. Seabra, A. G., Dias, N. M., Mecca, T., & Macedo, E. C. (2017). Contribution of word reading speed to reading comprehension in Brazilian children: Does speed matter to the comprehension model? Frontiers in Psychology. Centro Universitário FIEO, Osasco, Brazil. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00630]
16. Skinner, C. H., Williams, J. L., Morrow, J. A., Hale, A. D., Neddenriep, C. E., & Hawkins, R. O. (2009). The validity of reading comprehension rate: Reading speed, comprehension, and comprehension rates. Psychology in the Schools. Wiley Inter-Science. [DOI:10.1002/pits.20442]
17. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.
https://doi.org/10.2307/747348 [DOI:10.2307/747348 https://www.jstor.org/stable/747348]
18. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive recourses, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10(1), 72-100. [DOI:10.1016/0273-2297(90)90005-O]
19. Thomas, P. (2022). The science of reading movement: The Never-ending debate and the Need for a different approach to reading instruction. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep43761
20. Turkyılmaz, M., Remzi, C., Yildirim, K., & Ates, S. (2013). Relations among oral reading fluency, Silent reading fluency, retell fluency, and reading comprehension. Science Direct 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 116. 4030 - 4034 1877-0428. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.885]
21. Yen, T. T. N. (2016). EFL reading speed and reading comprehension. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 21(10), 01-10.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
