Volume 8, Issue 4 (9-2023)
IJREE 2023, 8(4): 51-60 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Safarzadeh M, Taghipour Bazargani D. Exploring Iranian ESP Teachers’ Assessment Practices in Online Specialized English Courses. IJREE 2023; 8 (4)
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-816-en.html
URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-816-en.html
Assistant professor in Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Guilan, Iran
Abstract: (607 Views)
As an integral dimension of instruction, assessment determines whether or not the educational goals are being fulfilled. The present study was an attempt to investigate Iranian ESP instructors’ common classroom assessment practices. To this end, based on convenience sampling, eight different ESP teachers teaching BA students from a variety of departments at Rasht Islamic Azad University, Iran were selected. An observation checklist containing 31 items was used as the only data-gathering instrument of this study. The results of the descriptive statistics revealed that some assessment practices including using portfolio to assess student progress, assessing group class participation, conducting item analysis for teacher-made tests, and writing matching questions were applied less frequently in the ESP classes. However, some assessment practices such as incorporating attendance in the calculation of grades and recognizing unethical, illegal, or inappropriate uses of assessment information were more likely to be used in the observed ESP classes. The instructors were also more likely to incorporate classroom behavior in the calculation of grades, incorporate extra credit activities in the calculation of grades, recognize unethical, illegal, or inappropriate assessment methods, and inform students how grades are to be assigned. It is concluded that ESP teachers utilize both traditional testing and alternative assessment for achieving a complementary process of assessment, and they call for an integration of them due to their importance in assessing both the process and product of learning. The results of this study may hopefully be beneficial for curriculum developers, materials developers, course and syllabus designers, teachers and teacher trainers, and the other stakeholders in the fields of language teaching and learning as well.
References
1. Atai, M. R., Babaii, E., & Taghipour Bazargani, D. (2017). Developing a questionnaire for assessing Iranian EFL teachers' critical cultural awareness (CCA). Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 36(2), 1-38. doi: 10.22099/jtls.2017.24688.2215
2. Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions, and directions. New York, NY: Heinle & Heinle Pub.
3. Bloom, B. S. (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. In Educational evaluation: New roles, new means. The 63rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 2 (Vol. 69), ed. R.W. Tyler, 26-50. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press [DOI:10.1177/016146816907001003]
4. Butler, G. Y., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5-31. doi:10.1177/0265532209346370 [DOI:10.1177/0265532209346370]
5. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2003). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. London and New York: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203496626]
6. Chen, Y. M. (2008). Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 235-262. [DOI:10.1177/1362168807086293]
7. Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113-132. [DOI:10.1080/15434303.2011.642041]
8. Ghavidel, M., & Valipour, V. (2021). Iranian EFL instructors' educational and professional backgrounds and their awareness of assessment strategies and teaching skills. International Journal of Research in English Education, 6(4), 36-56. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-606-en.html [DOI:10.52547/ijree.6.4.36]
9. Ghazizadeh, M., & Taghipour Bazargani, D. (2019). Alternative assessment: The impact of self-assessment vs. peer-assessment on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' paragraph writing ability. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 10, 1-13. doi:10.32038/ltrq.2019.10.01 [DOI:10.32038/ltrq.2019.10.01]
10. Gholizadeh, M., & Taghipour Bazargani, D. (2022). On the impact of literature reading on Iranian upper-intermediate male and female EFL learners' creative writing Ability. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(1), 49-60. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-633-en.html [DOI:10.52547/ijree.7.1.49]
11. Heaton, J. B. (1975). Writing English language tests. London: Longman Group Ltd.
12. Huerta-Macias, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: responses to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5(1), 8-11.
13. Ismael, D. A. I. (2017). The assessment practices of in-service Kurdish tertiary TESOL teachers and their cognitions of alternative assessment. University of Exeter (United Kingdom).
14. Koumachi, B. (2021). Evaluating the evaluator: Towards understanding feed-back, feed-up, and feed-forward of Moroccan Doctorate supervisors' reports. International Journal of Research in English Education, 6(4), 91-105. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-615-en.html [DOI:10.52547/ijree.6.4.91]
15. Kremmel, B., & Harding, L. (2020). Towards a comprehensive, empirical model of language assessment literacy across stakeholder groups: Developing the language assessment literacy survey. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(1), 100-120. [DOI:10.1080/15434303.2019.1674855]
16. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49-72. [DOI:10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872]
17. Law, B., & Eckes, M. (1995). Assessment and ESL. Peguis Publishers: Manitoba, Canada.
18. Lee, J., & Butler, Y. G. (2020). Reconceptualizing language assessment literacy: Where are language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 1098-1111. [DOI:10.1002/tesq.576]
19. Levi, T., & Inbar-Lourie, O. (2020). Assessment literacy or language assessment literacy: Learning from the teachers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(2), 168-182. [DOI:10.1080/15434303.2019.1692347]
20. Lynch, B. K. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing, 18(4), 351-372. [DOI:10.1177/026553220101800403]
21. Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75-100. [DOI:10.1177/0265532208097337]
22. McDowell, L., & Mowl, G. (1996) Innovative assessment - its impact on students, 131-147 in Gibbs, G. (ed.) Improving student learning through assessment and evaluation, Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
23. McNamara, T., Knoch, U., & Fan, J. (2019). Fairness, justice and language assessment. Oxford University Press.
24. Mihanyar, S., & Ashraf, H. (2020). Positive assessment: Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners speaking skill and their self-efficacy. International Journal of Research in English Education, 5(4), 113-125. http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-478-en.html [DOI:10.29252/ijree.5.4.113]
25. Paris, S., & Ayres, L. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4-11. [DOI:10.1080/00405840802577536]
27. Sadighi, F., Jamasbi, F., & Ramezani, S. (2018). The impact of using dynamic assessment on Iranian's writing literacy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(9), 1246-1251. doi:10.17507/tpls.0809.21 [DOI:10.17507/tpls.0809.21]
28. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
29. Shepard, L. A. (2013). Foreword. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. xix-xxii). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
30. Shohamy, E. (2017). ELF and critical language testing. In J. Jenkins, M. Dewey, & W. Baker (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca (pp. 583-593). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315717173-47]
31. Short, K. G., & Burke, C. (1991). Creating curriculum: Instructors and students as a community of learners. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.
32. Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer- assessment. The University of Waikato.
33. Tsagari, D., & Vogt, K. (2017). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers around Europe: Research, challenges and future prospects. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 41-63. doi:10.58379/UHIX9883 [DOI:10.58379/UHIX9883]
34. Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374-402. [DOI:10.1080/15434303.2014.960046]
35. Tajeddin, Z., Khatib, M., & Mahdavi, M. (2022). Critical language assessment literacy of the EFL teachers: Scale construction and validation. Language Testing, X, 1-30. [DOI:10.1177/02655322211057040]
36. Tuttle, H. G. (2009). Formative assessment: Responding to your students. Eye ON Education, Inc, Larchmont, NY.
37. William, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.). The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning. (pp. 53-82). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [DOI:10.4324/9781315086545-3]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
